Literature DB >> 30729818

A novel software platform for volumetric assessment of ablation completeness.

Marco Solbiati1, Riccardo Muglia2, S Nahum Goldberg3,4, Tiziana Ierace5, Alessandro Rotilio1, Katia M Passera1, Ilaria Marre1, Luigi Solbiati2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of a novel software platform for assessing completeness of percutaneous thermal ablations. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Ninety hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in 50 patients receiving percutaneous ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) that resulted in apparent technical success at 24-h post-ablation computed tomography (CT) and with ≥1-year imaging follow-up were randomly selected from a 320 HCC ablation database (2010-2016). Using a novel volumetric registration software, pre-ablation CT volumes of the HCCs without and with the addition of a 5 mm safety margin, and corresponding post-ablation necrosis volumes were segmented, co-registered and overlapped. These were compared to visual side-by-side inspection of axial images.
RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, CT showed absence of local tumor progression (LTP) in 69/90 (76.7%) cases and LTP in 21/90 (23.3%). For HCCs classified by the software as "incomplete tumor treatments", LTP developed in 13/17 (76.5%) and all 13 (100%) of these LTPs occurred exactly where residual non-ablated tumor was identified by retrospective software analysis. HCCs classified as "complete ablation with <100% 5 mm ablative margins" had LTP in 8/49 (16.3%), while none of 24 HCCs with "complete ablation including 100% 5 mm ablative margins" had LTP. Differences in LTP between both partially ablated HCCs vs completely ablated HCCs, and ablated HCCs with <100% vs with 100% 5 mm margins were statistically significant (p < .0001 and p = .036, respectively). Thus, 13/21 (61.9%) incomplete tumor treatments could have been detected immediately, were the software available at the time of ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel software platform for volumetric assessment of ablation completeness may increase the detection of incompletely ablated tumors, thereby holding the potential to avoid subsequent recurrences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D rendering; CT; ablation; image processing; software

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30729818     DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1569267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  15 in total

1.  Percutaneous ablation of post-surgical solitary early recurrence of colorectal liver metastases is an effective "test-of-time" approach.

Authors:  Luca Vigano; Jacopo Galvanin; Dario Poretti; Daniele Del Fabbro; Damiano Gentile; Vittorio Pedicini; Luigi Solbiati; Guido Torzilli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-12

Review 2.  Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Liver.

Authors:  Juan C Camacho; Elena N Petre; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos; Mithat Gonen; Vlasios Sotirchos; Elena Kaye; Elena N Petre; Stephen B Solomon; Joseph P Erinjeri; Etay Ziv; Assen Kirov; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.753

4.  Immunofluorescence Assay of Ablated Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Frozen Section of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation?

Authors:  Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos; Efsevia Vakiani; Sho Fujisawa; Mithat Gonen; Ning Fan; Yevgeniy Romin; Richard K G Do; Etay Ziv; Joseph P Erinjeri; Elena N Petre; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Juan C Camacho; Stephen B Solomon; Katia Manova-Todorova; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.682

5.  Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Raluca-Maria Sandu; Iwan Paolucci; Simeon J S Ruiter; Raphael Sznitman; Koert P de Jong; Jacob Freedman; Stefan Weber; Pascale Tinguely
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  F-18 FDG perfusion PET: intraprocedural assessment of the liver tumor ablation margin.

Authors:  Paul B Shyn; Alan J Cubre; Paul J Catalano; Leslie K Lee; Hyewon Hyun; Kemal Tuncali; Julia G Seol; Vincent M Levesque; Victor H Gerbaudo; Tina Kapur; Ryan T Chao; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-19

7.  Performance of the Emprint and Amica Microwave Ablation Systems in ex vivo Porcine Livers: Sphericity and Reproducibility Versus Size.

Authors:  P Hendriks; W E M Berkhout; C I Kaanen; J H Sluijter; I J Visser; J J van den Dobbelsteen; L F de Geus-Oei; A G Webb; M C Burgmans
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Safety margin assessment after microwave ablation of liver tumors: inter- and intrareader variability.

Authors:  Jan Schaible; Benedikt Pregler; Wolf Bäumler; Ingo Einspieler; Ernst-Michael Jung; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas Philipp Beyer
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pascale Tinguely; Iwan Paolucci; Simeon J S Ruiter; Stefan Weber; Koert P de Jong; Daniel Candinas; Jacob Freedman; Jennie Engstrand
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Gregor Laimer; Nikolai Jaschke; Peter Schullian; Daniel Putzer; Gernot Eberle; Marco Solbiati; Luigi Solbiati; S Nahum Goldberg; Reto Bale
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.