Literature DB >> 30728601

Removing chaos from confusion: assigning names to common human and animal pathogens in Neocosmospora.

M Sandoval-Denis1,2, P W Crous1,2.   

Abstract

The genus Neocosmospora encompasses highly prevalent and aggressive human and animal fungal pathogens. Here we assign formal descriptions and Latin binomials to some of the most clinically relevant phylogenetic species of the genus. Three new species, named Neocosmospora catenata, N. gamsii and N. suttoniana (previously assigned to the informal names 'Fusarium' solani species complex (FSSC) lineages, FSSC 43, FSSC 7 and FSSC 20, respectively) are described on the basis of multilocus phylogenetic analyses (using EF-1α, ITS, LSU and RPB2 loci) and morphological characters. Lineage FSSC 9 is conspecific with the ex-type strain of Cylindrocarpon tonkinense, thus the new combination Neocosmospora tonkinensis is proposed. In addition, and based on the latest taxonomy for this generic complex, new combinations are introduced for four medically important taxa: Neocosmospora keratoplastica, N. lichenicola, N. metavorans and N. petroliphila. The most significant distinctive features for all the clinically relevant species treated here are compared and illustrated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusarium; Neocosmospora; eight new taxa; pathogens; phylogeny; systematics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30728601      PMCID: PMC6344815          DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Persoonia        ISSN: 0031-5850            Impact factor:   11.051


INTRODUCTION

The genus Neocosmospora (as the ‘Fusarium’ solani species complex, FSSC) has been a highly renowned fungal group for more than 100 years, mainly because it contains significant plant pathogenic species, including agents of fruit-rot, root-rot and seedling damping-off, affecting diverse plant hosts (Leslie & Summerell 2006, Domsch et al. 2007, Nalim et al. 2011). In the last 50 years, however, this fungal group gradually and persistently became recognised as important in the clinical field. It is now known to contain some of the fungal species that are most clinically relevant as agents infecting immunocompetent hosts. This list of species includes the principal etiologic agents of fungal keratitis, which are often introduced via traumatic inoculation (De Hoog et al. 2000, Godoy et al. 2004, Shukla et al. 2008). In addition are the second most commonly isolated moulds in onychomycosis after the dermatophytes (Ghannoum et al. 2000, Scher et al. 2013). Species in Neocosmospora are also among the most significant pathogens associated with severe infections in transplant recipients and patients with haematological malignancies, persistent neutropenia or immunodepression caused by corticosteroid therapy (Lass-Flörl 2009, Torres & Kontoyiannis 2011, Guarro 2013, Slavin et al. 2015). Although fusarial infections are rare, nearly 50 % of these infections are attributed to Neocosmospora. The most commonly reported species correspond to ‘F.’ keratoplasticum, ‘F.’ petroliphilum, N. falciformis (syn. F. falciforme) and N. solani (syn. F. solani); plus several currently unnamed phylogenetic species. These organisms are recovered from diverse cutaneous and subcutaneous infections including arthritis, brain abscess, catheter-associated fungemia, disseminated infections, mycetoma, osteomyelitis, peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis and sinusitis, as well as many other types of infections (Dignani & Anaissie 2004, Garcia et al. 2015, Hiebert et al. 2016). Human pathogenic species in Neocosmospora are also among the most important fusarial agents of veterinary infections (Zhang et al. 2006, O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2010, 2016). Apart from N. solani, other species seem to show some degree of host specialisation. Neocosmospora falciformis has been repeatedly isolated from equine ocular infections, and has also been reported from canines and reptiles (O’Donnell et al. 2016), while ‘F’. keratoplasticum and two currently unnamed phylogenetic species (FSSC 12 and FSSC 43) seem to have some adaptation to the marine environment, infecting mostly crustaceans, fish, marine mammals and reptiles (O’Donnell et al. 2016). The generally high degree of antifungal resistance, variable in vitro susceptibility patterns and unpredictable response to antifungal compounds seen in Neocosmospora infections, coupled with the high virulence described in clinical reports and animal models of infection, are factors often associated with negative outcomes, placing these species among the most devastating fungal agents of human and animal disease (Sugiura et al. 2003, Azor et al. 2007, Araujo et al. 2015, Espinel-Ingroff et al. 2016, Taj-Aldeen et al. 2016). Phylogenetic studies have shown that Neocosmospora solani, historically linked with human and veterinary disease, do not belong to a discrete taxon but rather represent an extensive evolutionary radiation comprising more than 15 phylogenetic species. With the exception of the four most commonly isolated species, N. falciformis, ‘F.’ keratoplasticum, ‘F.’ petroliphilum and N. solani, most of these phylospecies have not been formally described, thus are not linked to scientific names, in part because they are scarcely distinguishable by means of phenotypic comparison. Although phylogenetically well characterised, comprehensive morphological descriptions and diagnoses do not exist for these important lineages, which are currently identified following an informal haplotype nomenclatural system (Zhang et al. 2006, O’Donnell et al. 2008). The use of Latin binomials is not a common feature for clades containing human and veterinary pathogens in Neocosmospora, mainly due to the conflicting taxonomy of the genus, the non-existence of nomenclatural types and the uncertainty of application of previously published names. Moreover, the name ‘Fusarium’ solani has been traditionally used by clinical microbiologists and plant pathologists as a wildcard to deal with isolates belonging to this complex when molecular tools are not available (Zhang et al. 2006, Nakamura et al. 2007, Bachmeyer 2007, O’Donnell et al. 2016). Meanwhile, new lineages not conforming to an existing haplotype designation are constantly being found (Guevara-Suarez et al. 2016, Melo et al. 2016). Recently, Schroers et al. (2016) epitypified Neocosmospora solani (basionym: Fusisporium solani) linking this important plant and animal pathogen with clade 5 in FSSC. Al-Hatmi et al. (2018) formally proposed the name ‘Fusarium’ metavorans for FSSC 6, one of the most prevalent lineages in human disease, while FSSC 12, which includes important veterinary pathogens, is currently under study and will soon be formally described (Geiser pers. comm.). However, several unnamed clades are still in need of formal description, and those containing animal pathogens are of particular importance (O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2016). An accurate identification of pathogenic fusaria is essential for epidemiological purposes and for the prompt establishment of efficacious clinical treatment (Bachmeyer 2007). It is known that antifungal susceptibility in fusaria is variable among closely related taxa, and often isolate-dependant (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al. 2008, Tortorano et al. 2008). This phenomenon has not yet been reported in Neocosmospora (Azor et al. 2007, Bachmeyer 2007), and remains an under-studied issue in the genus. In the present study, we examine a set of isolates previously assigned to five of the most prevalent pathogenic clades in Neocosmospora (‘F.’ metavorans, FSSC 7, FSSC 9, FSSC 20 and FSSC 43), along with strains belonging to the most commonly encountered clinically relevant species mentioned above. Latin binomials, detailed illustrations, morphological descriptions and comparisons are provided in order to facilitate identification by clinical microbiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains

Forty-five isolates originally recovered from human and veterinary clinical specimens and belonging to the clades termed ‘F.’ metavorans, FSSC 7, FSSC 9, FSSC 20 and FSSC 43 as previously defined using multilocus phylogenetic data (Zhang et al. 2006, O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2016), were retrieved from the collections of the Agricultural Research Service, Peoria, IL, USA (NRRL) and the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands (CBS). For morphological comparisons and phylogenetic analyses, cultures or DNA sequences from 88 additional isolates were included in the study; these isolates were obtained from the CBS, the personal collection of P.W. Crous (CPC) housed at CBS, the Fusarium Research Center housed in The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA (FRC), the personal collection of Kerry O’Donnell (KOD), the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX (UTHSC), the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA (ATCC), CABI Biosciences, Egham, Surrey, England (IMI) and NRRL (Table 1).
Table 1

Origin, culture and DNA sequence accession numbers of the isolates included in this study.

Species nameLineage nameaStrain codebHost/SampleCountryGenBank/EMBL accession numberc
EF-1αITSLSURPB2
‘Fusarium’ brasiliense NRRL 31757 Glycine max Brazil EF408409 EF408514 FJ919513 EU329565
‘Fusarium’ euwallaceaeFSSC 36CBS 135854T = NRRL 54722Euwallacea sp. IsraelJQ038007JQ038014JQ038014JQ038028
FSSC 36NRRL 62626Euwallacea sp. USAKC691532KC691560KC691560KU171702
‘Fusarium’ solani f. sp. batatas FSSC 23 NRRL 22400 Ipomoea batatasUSAAF178343AF178407DQ236345EU329509
‘Fusarium’ solani f. sp. pisiFSSC 11NRRL 22278Pisum sativumUSAAF178337DQ094309DQ236351EU329501
FSSC 11NRRL 22820Glycine maxUSAAF178355DQ094310DQ236352EU329532
‘Fusarium’ solani f. sp. xanthoxyliFSSC 22 NRRL 22277 Xanthoxylum sp. Japan AF178336 AF178401 AF178370 FJ240380
‘Fusarium’ striatumFSSC 21NRRL 22101Cotton cloth PanamaAF178333AF178398AF178367EU329490
FSSC 21NRRL 52699Unknown UnknownJF740782JF740905JF740905JF741108
Geejayeesia atrofusca NRRL 22316 Staphylea trifolia USA AF178361 AF178423 AF178392JX171609
Geejayeesia cicatricum CBS 125552 Buxus sempervirens Slovenia HM626644 HQ728145HQ728153
Neocosmospora catenataFSSC 43NRRL 54992Zebra shark multiple tissues USAKC808213KC808255MG189913KC808354
FSSC 43NRRL 54993TZebra shark multiple tissues USAKC808214KC808256MG189914KC808355
Neocosmospora croci CBS 115659Potato GermanyJX435156JX435206JX435206JX435256
CBS 142423TCitrus sinensisItalyLT746216LT746264LT746264LT746329
CPC 27187Citrus sinensisItalyLT746217LT746265LT746265LT746330
Neocosmospora cyanescens FSSC 27 CBS 518.82T = NRRL 37625 Human foot The Netherlands FJ240353 EU329684 EU329684 EU329637
Neocosmospora falciformisFSSC 3+4CBS 318.73 = NRRL 22660Trichosanthes dioicaIndiaJX435158JX435208JX435208JX435258
FSSC 3+4CBS 475.67THuman Puerto RicoLT906669 MG18993 MG189915 LT960558
FSSC 3+4NRRL 54219Human spine USAHQ401721**HQ401723
Neocosmospora gamsii FSSC 7CBS 217.53 = NRRL 22655Plywood NigeriaDQ247637MG189936 MG189916LT960559
FSSC 7CBS 700.86 = NRRL 22236Unknown BrazilDQ247624DQ094763MG189917LT960560
FSSC 7CBS 130181 = NRRL 43502Human eye USADQ790488DQ790532DQ790532DQ790576
FSSC 7CBS 143207T = NRRL 32323Human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid USADQ246951DQ094420DQ236462EU329576
FSSC 7CBS 143209 = NRRL 32770Human eye USADQ247083DQ094544DQ236586EU329615
FSSC 7CBS 143211 = NRRL 32794Collant fluid humidifier USADQ247103DQ094563DQ236605EU329622
Neocosmospora haematococa CBS 119600ETDying tree Sri Lanka DQ247510 KM231797 KM231664 LT960561
Neocosmospora illudens NRRL 22090 Beilschmiedia tawa New Zealand AF178326 AF178393 AF178362 JX171601
Neocosmospora keratoplasticaFSSC 2CBS 490.63THuman JapanLT906670**LT960562
FSSC 2NRRL 43373Contact lens MalaysiaEF452920EF453072EF453072EF469959
FSSC 2NRRL 43458Human SingaporeDQ790511EU329686EU329686DQ790599
Neocosmospora lichenicola FSSC 16NRRL 28030Human ThailandDQ246877DQ094355DQ236397EF470146
FSSC 16NRRL 34123Human eye IndiaDQ247192DQ094645DQ236687EU329635
Neocosmospora macrospora CBS 142424TCitrus sinensisItalyLT746218LT746266LT746281LT746331
CPC 28192Citrus sinensisItalyLT746219LT746267LT746282LT746332
CPC 28193Citrus sinensisItalyLT746220LT746268LT746283LT746333
Neocosmospora mahasenii CBS 119594TDead branch of live tree Sri Lanka DQ247513 JF433045 JF433045 LT960563
Neocosmospora metavoransFSSC 6CBS 130400 = NRRL 43489Human cornea USADQ790484DQ790528DQ790528DQ790572
FSSC 6CBS 143194 = NRRL 22782Human corneal ulcer SpainDQ246850EU329670EU329670EU329528
FSSC 6CBS 143195 = NRRL 22792Human eye USADQ246854EU329671EU329671EU329531
FSSC 6CBS 143198 = NRRL 28016Human USADQ246873EU329673EU329673EF470140
FSSC 6CBS 143199 = NRRL 28017Human USADQ246874*FJ240359EF470141
FSSC 6CBS 143200 = NRRL 28018Human USADQ246875* FJ240360EF470142
FSSC 6CBS 143201 = NRRL 28019Human USADQ246876* FJ240361EF470143
FSSC 6CBS 143202 = NRRL 28542 = UTHSC 98-1246Human bone USADQ246883EU329675EU329675EU329543
FSSC 6CBS 143210 = NRRL 32785 = FRC S-1123Human toenail cancer USADQ247094*FJ240371EU329618
FSSC 6CBS 143213 = NRRL 32849 = FRC S-1355Human eye USADQ247155EU329682EU329682EU329628
FSSC 6CBS 143215 = NRRL 37640 = UTHSC R-3564Human TurkeyFJ240355EU329685 EU329685EU329638
FSSC 6CBS 143216 = NRRL 43717Human chest USAFJ240356EU329688EU329688EF470233
FSSC 6CBS 143218 = NRRL 46237Human USAFJ240357*FJ240378FJ240411
FSSC 6CBS 143219 = NRRL 46708 = FMR 8634Human foot Spain*EU329717EU329717EU329666
FSSC 6F111Unknown Unknown****
FSSC 6KOD418Unknown Unknown****
FSSC 6NRRL 28553Human foot USADQ246894EU329676EU329676EU329548
FSSC 6NRRL 44892Unknown UnknownGU170618GU170638 GU170638GU170583
FSSC 6NRRL 44904Unknown UnknownGU170621 GU170641GU170641GU170586
FSSC 6NRRL 52746Unknown UnknownJF740822JF740921JF740921JF740994
Neocosmospora petroliphila FSSC 1NRRL 32315 = UTHSC 00-332Human groin ulcer USADQ246943DQ094412DQ236454*
FSSC 1NRRL 46706 = FMR 8340Human blood QatarAM412594EU329715EU329715EU329664
Neocosmospora plagianthi NRRL 22632 Hoheria glabrata New Zealand AF178354 AF178417 AF178386 JX171614
Neocosmospora pseudensiformisFSSC 33CBS 241.93 = NRRL 53635Human SurinameJX435148JX435198JX435198JX435248
FSSC 33CBS 125729TUnknown dead tree Sri LankaDQ247512KC691584KC691584KC691645
FSSC 33NRRL 22354Bark French GuianaAF178338AF178402DQ236358EU329504
FSSC 33NRRL 46517 = FRC S-1834Unknown UnknownKC691555KC691584KC691584KC691645
Neocosmospora solani FSSC 5CBS 140079ET = NRRL 66304 = FRC S-2364Solanum tuberosum SloveniaKT313611KT313633KT313633KT313623
FSSC 5NRRL 32484 = FRC S-1242Human USADQ246982DQ094449DQ236491EU329583
FSSC 5 NRRL 43474Human eyeUSAEF452945EF453097EF453097EF469984
Neocosmospora sp. FSSC 10NRRL 22098Cucurbit USAAF178327DQ094301DQ236343EU329489
FSSC 10NRRL 22153 = ATCC 18099Cucurbit PanamaAF178346DQ094302DQ236344EU329492
FSSC 12CBS 143196 = NRRL 25392 = ATCC 32752American lobsterUSADQ246861EU329672EU329672EU329537
FSSC 12CBS 143203 = NRRL 32309 = UTHSC 00-1608Sea turtleUSADQ246937DQ094407DQ236449EU329571
FSSC 12CBS 143206 = NRRL 32317 = UTHSC 99-1886TreefishUSADQ246945DQ094414DQ236456EU329575
FSSC 12CBS 143212 = NRRL 32821 = FRC S-1230Turtle eggsUSADQ247128DQ094587DQ236629EU329625
FSSC 12CBS 143220 = NRRL 54720 = UTHSC 10-3125Lined sea horse aquarium waterUSAJQ743207JQ743209JQ743209JQ743211
FSSC 12CBS 143221 = NRRL 54968Bonnet head sharkUSALT906671MG189937MG189918KC808332
FSSC 12CBS 143222 = NRRL 54970 = UTHSC 05-175Antler crabUSAKC808195MG189938MG189919KC808334
FSSC 12CBS 143223 = NRRL 54971 = UTHSC 05-2774Reptile bronchus USAKC808196KC808237MG189920KC808335
FSSC 12CBS 143225 = NRRL 54974 = UTHSC 06-1538Honeycomb fish USAKC808198KC808239MG189921KC808337
FSSC 12CBS 143226 = NRRL 54979 = UTHSC 06-3660Kemps Ridley turtle USAKC808202KC808244MG189922KC808342
FSSC 12CBS 143227 = NRRL 54982 = UTHSC 07-1869Kemps Ridley turtle USAKC808205MG189939MG189923KC808345
FSSC 12CBS 143230 = NRRL 62549 = UTHSC 08-1422Horseshoe crab USAKC808220KC808264MG189924KC808352
FSSC 12NRRL 22642 = ATCC 38341Penaceous japonicus JapanDQ246844 DQ094329DQ236371EU329522
FSSC 12NRRL 22834Lobster AustraliaDQ247663 **FJ240382
FSSC 12NRRL 46704 = FMR 7140Aquarium sand Spain*EU329713EU329713EU329662
FSSC 12NRRL 46705 = FMR 7414Aquarium sand Spain* EU329714 EU329714 EU329663
FSSC 13NRRL 22161Robinia pseudoacaciaJapanAF178330DQ094311DQ236353EU329494
FSSC 13NRRL 22162 = ATCC 18693Robinia pseudoacaciaJapanDQ247561EU329667EU329667EU329495
FSSC 13NRRL 22586Robinia pseudoacaciaJapanAF178353AF178416AF178385EU329516
FSSC 14CBS 130177 = NRRL 22611Human cornea USADQ246841DQ094326DQ236368EU329518
FSSC 14NRRL 32705 = FRC S-0390Human skin USADQ247025DQ094488DQ236530EU329594
FSSC 15NRRL 28009Human USADQ246869DQ094351DQ236393EF470136
FSSC 15NRRL 32792 = FRC S-1143Human cutaneous nodules JapanDQ247101DQ094561DQ236603EU329621
FSSC 17NRRL 22157 = NRRL 22479 = ATCC 18689Morus albaJapanAF178359DQ094306DQ236348EU329493
FSSC 17NRRL 22230 = ATCC 44934Morus albaJapanAF178358DQ094305DQ236347EU329499
FSSC 18NRRL 31158Human USADQ246916DQ094389DQ236431EU329559
FSSC 19CBS 571.94 = NRRL 36510Camelia sinensisIndiaKC691530KC691558KC691558KC691619
FSSC 19NRRL 20438 = IMI 296597Camelia sinensisIndiaAF178332AF178397DQ236357JX171584
FSSC 19NRRL 22346Camelia sinensisIndiaFJ240350EU329669EU329669EU329503
FSSC 24CBS 117481 = NRRL 22389Liriodendron tulipiferaUSAAF178340AF178404DQ236356EU329506
FSSC 25CBS 102824 = NRRL 53598Leaf litter ColombiaJX435147JX435197JX435197JX435247
FSSC 25CBS 130328 = NRRL 31169Human oral wound USADQ246923DQ094396DQ236438KR673999
FSSC 26NRRL 28541 = UTHSC 98-1305Human synovial fluid USADQ246882EU329674EU329674EU329542
FSSC 28CBS 109028 = NRRL 32437Human subcutaneous nodule SwitzerlandDQ246979DQ094446DQ236488EU329581
FSSC 28NRRL 52705Unknown UnknownJF740787**JF741113
FSSC 29KOD253Unknown Unknown****
FSSC 29NRRL 28008Human USADQ246868DQ094350DQ236392EF470135
FSSC 34NRRL 46596Unknown UnknownGU170627GU170647GU170647GU170592
FSSC 34NRRL 46703 = FMR 8281Nematode SpainHM347126EU329712EU329712EU329661
FSSC 35NRRL 46707 = FMR 8030Human BrazilHM347127EU329716EU329716EU329665
FSSC 37NRRL 25137Diseased cocoa pods New GuineaJF740757JF740899JF740899JF741084
FSSC 37NRRL 25138Diseased cocoa pods New GuineaDQ247537JF740900JF740900JF741085
FSSC 38NRRL 52782Hypothenemus hampei adult Benin*JF740850JF740850JF741176
FSSC 38NRRL 52783Hypothenemus hampei adult UgandaJF740851**JF741177
FSSC 40F1285Unknown Unknown****
FSSC 45KOD614Unknown Unknown****
Neocosmospora suttoniana FSSC 20CBS 124892Human nail GabonJX435139JX435189JX435189JX435239
FSSC 20CBS 130178 = NRRL 22608 = UTHSC 93-1547Human USADQ246838DQ236365DQ094323EU329517
FSSC 20CBS 143197 = NRRL 28000Human blood USADQ246865DQ094347DQ236389EF470128
FSSC 20CBS 143204 = NRRL 32316 = UTHSC 00-264Human corneal ulcer USADQ246944DQ094413DQ236455EU329574
FSSC 20CBS 143214T = NRRL 32858Human wound USADQ247163DQ094617DQ236659EU329630
FSSC 20CBS 143224 = NRRL 54972 = UTHSC 05-2900Equine eye UnknownKC808197MG189940MG189925KC808336
FSSC 20NRRL 28001Human skin USADQ246866DQ094348 DQ236390 EF470129
Neocosmospora tonkinensis FSSC 9CBS 115.40T = NRRL 53586 = IMI 113868Musa sapientum VietnamLT906672MG189941MG189926LT960564
FSSC 9CBS 143038Human cornea The NetherlandsLT906673MG189942MG189927LT960565
FSSC 9CBS 143208 = NRRL 32755 = FRCS-0452Turtle head lesionUSADQ247073 DQ094534 DQ236576 EU329613
FSSC 9CBS 143217 = NRRL 43811Human cornea USAEF453053EF453204 EF453204 EF470092
FSSC 9FRC S-2484Unknown Unknown****
FSSC 9FRC S-2540Unknown Unknown****
FSSC 9NRRL 46615Unknown UnknownGU250543GU250666GU250666GU250728
FSSC 9NRRL 46676Unknown UnknownGU250546GU250669GU250669GU250731
Neocosmospora vasinfecta FSSC 8CBS 130182 = NRRL 43467Human USAEF452940EF453092EF453092EF469979
FSSC 8NRRL 34174 = UTHSC 03-1457Human USA***EU329636

a Following the clade nomenclature by O’Donnell et al. (2008).

b CBS = Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC = Personal collection of Pedro W. Crous, held at CBS; FMR = Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain; FRC = Fusarium Research Center housed in The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA; IMI = CABI Genetic Resource Collection, Surrey, UK; KOD = personal collection of Kerry O’Donnell; NRRL = collections of the Agricultural Research Service, Peoria, IL, USA; All others = as named in K. O’Donnell's sequence database. Ex-type and ex-epitype strains are indicated with T and ET, respectively.

c EMBL = The European Molecular Biology Laboratory; EF-1α = partial fragment of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha; ITS = Internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA; LSU = partial fragment of the large ribosomal subunit gene; RPB2 = partial fragment of the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II, second largest subunit. Accession numbers of sequences generated in this study are in bold. Sequences marked with * were provided by Kerry O’Donnell and are not currently publicly available.

Morphology

Morphological observations and measurements of macro- and microscopic features were performed following the protocols of Aoki et al. (2003, 2005, 2013) with slight modifications as described previously (Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018). Macroscopic characteristics of fungal growth were evaluated using cornmeal agar (CMA), oatmeal agar (OA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) (recipes in Crous et al. 2009). Colony morphology, colour, odour and presence of diffusible pigments were recorded after cultures had grown 7 d at 25 °C in darkness, under continuous fluorescent light and using a 12/12 h cool fluorescent light/dark cycle. For growth rate experiments, cultures were made on PDA agar, by transferring 5 × 5 mm agar blocks from 7-d-old cultures growing on synthetic nutrient poor agar (SNA; Nirenberg 1976). These cultures were incubated in darkness at temperatures ranging from 6–40 °C in 3 °C intervals. Growth rates were recorded after 3 and 7 d by measuring the radial colonial size in at least four directions. The micromorphological examination was made using water as mounting medium, with material taken from cultures on SNA with and without sterilised pieces of carnation leaves, incubated at room temperature (Snyder & Hansen 1947, Fisher et al. 1982, Leslie & Summerell 2006) under a 12/12 h cool fluorescent light/dark cycle. Photographs and measurements were done using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope with Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) optics and a Nikon AZ100 stereomicroscope, both equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri2 high definition colour digital camera, and a Nikon SMZ1000 stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DS-Fi1 colour digital camera. Digital images were processed using the Nikon software NIS-elements D software v. 4.50. Measurements were taken for each structure from at least 30 randomly selected elements and the mean values, SD and maximum–minimum values were calculated. Line drawings were made from microphotographs using Adobe Illustrator CS5.1 v. 15.1.0.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Isolates were grown for 7–10 d on malt extract agar (MEA) plates, incubated under continuous fluorescent light at room temperature. Total genomic DNA was isolated from fresh mycelium scraped from the agar surface using the Wizard® Genomic DNA purification Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Four gene fragments, including the internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA (ITS), a partial fragment of the large subunit of the rDNA (LSU) (spanning the variable domains D1 to D3), two fragments of the RNA polymerase's second largest subunit (RPB2) and a portion of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α) were PCR amplified and sequenced according to previously published protocols (Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018) using the following primer pairs: ITS4/ITS5 for ITS (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR5 for LSU (Vilgalys & Hester 1990, Vilgalys & Sun 1994), 5f2/7cr and 7cf/11ar for RPB2 (Liu et al. 1999, Sung et al. 2007) and EF-1/EF-2 for EF-1α (O’Donnell et al. 1998). Consensus sequences were assembled from forward and reverse sequences using Seqman Pro v. 10.0.1 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). All sequences newly generated in this study were uploaded to GenBank and the European Nucleotide Archive (Table 1).

Phylogenetic analyses

Alignments of sequences of the four individual loci were made using MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh & Standley 2013) under the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI https://www.ebi.ac.uk) framework (Li et al. 2015), visually checked and manually corrected if needed using MEGA v. 7 (Kumar et al. 2016). The best evolutionary model for each dataset (GTR+I+G) was calculated using MrModeltest v. 2.3 (Nylander 2004). Phylogenetic inferences were made using three independent algorithms, Maximum Likelihood (ML), Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Bayesian analysis (BA), for each locus. The individual gene trees were assessed for incongruence by checking their individual phylogenies for conflicts between clades with significant ML, MP and BA support, after which the four gene datasets were concatenated (Mason-Gamer & Kellogg 1996, Wiens 1998). Maximum Likelihood and BA were run on the CIPRES Science Gateway portal (https://www.phylo.org/) (Miller et al. 2012) using RaxML v. 8.2.10 (Stamatakis 2014) and MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001, Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003), respectively. For ML analyses the default parameters were used and BS was carried out using the rapid bootstrapping algorithm with the automatic halt option. Bayesian analyses included four parallel runs of 5 000 000 generations, with the stop rule option and a sampling frequency of 1 000 generations. The burn-in fraction was set to 0.25, after which the 50 % majority rule consensus trees and posterior probability (PP) values were calculated. The resulting trees were plotted using FigTree v. 1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree). Maximum Parsimony analyses were carried out using PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). Heuristic searches consisted of 1 000 random stepwise addition replicates, with tree bisection and reconstruction (TBR) branch swapping. All characters were equally weighted and gaps were treated as missing data. Zero length branches were collapsed and all multiple, equally parsimonious trees were saved. Tree length, consistency index, retention index and rescaled consistency index (TL, CI, RI and RC, respectively) were calculated. Statistical support for the branches was evaluated using a bootstrap analysis (BS) of 1 000 replicates.

RESULTS

Phylogenetic assessment of pathogenic clades in Neocosmospora

To show the current known diversity in Neocosmospora as well as the phylogenetic position and genealogical exclusivity of the most important lineages containing human and veterinary pathogens, an overview phylogeny was constructed based on the original alignments published by O’Donnell et al. (2008). Individual gene phylogenies proved to be topologically consistent with each other, but showed different degrees of resolution for the most relevant pathogenic clades (data not shown, all trees available in TreeBASE). As evaluated on the basis of clade stability and ML BS values, RPB2 was the only locus unambiguously identifying all the clinically significant clades, including ‘Fusarium’ metavorans, FSSC 7, 9, 12, 20 and 43, as well as the important human and veterinary pathogens N. falciformis, ‘F.’ keratoplasticum, ‘F.’ petroliphilum and N. solani. Bootstrap values were between 93 and 100 %, except in the case of FSSC 9, where the BS was 76 %. The partitioned analysis of EF-1α resulted in moderate to highly supported monophyletic clades (BS = 75–100 %) for most of the pathogenic species with exception of FSSC 43. This analysis exposed considerable divergence among EF-1α sequences for strains within FSSC 7 and ‘F.’ keratoplasticum; the divergent strains formed sister lineages to the respective main clades. These subclades had low statistical support. The ITS phylogeny was able to clearly distinguish five of the most important lineages, N. falciformis, N. solani, ‘F.’ petroliphilum, FSSC 12 and FSSC 20, with BS = 76–99 %, while LSU allowed for the identification of only two pathogenic clades, FSSC 12 and FSSC 20, with BS = 71 and 92 %, respectively. The final analysis included 3 287 characters from four loci (EF-1α = 675, ITS = 491, LSU = 485, RPB2 = 1 636) of 132 strains including the outgroup taxa ‘F.’ cicatricum = Geejayessia cicatricum and ‘F.’ staphyleae = G. atrofusca (Schroers et al. 2011, 2016). Of the characters used, 2 297 were variable (EF-1α = 395, ITS = 343, LSU = 441, RPB2 = 1 118) and 742 were parsimony-informative (EF-1α = 207, ITS = 97, LSU = 33, RPB2 = 405). The ML search revealed a best tree with a lnL of -19162.599 (Fig. 1). The MP analysis produced 1 000 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 2 655 steps, CI = 0.489, RI = 0.830, RC = 0.406) highly congruent with that produced in ML. The BA lasted for 970 000 generations and the 50 % consensus tree and posterior probabilities were calculated from 728 trees (Fig. 1). The genus Neocosmospora received maximal statistical support (ML and MP BS = 100 % / 100 % and PP = 1). All human and veterinary pathogenic clades clustered within clade 3 of Neocosmospora sensu O’Donnell et al. (2008). All lineages containing clinically relevant unnamed phylogenetic species and currently known species resolved as monophyletic clades with strong statistical support (ML and MP BS = 100 % / 100 % and PP = 1) with exception of N. falciformis. This species lacked BS support in both ML and MP analyses, but had moderate BA support (PP = 0.98). The strain CBS 217.53, which showed a divergent EF-1α sequence, is provisionally retained here in clade FSSC 7 based on its morphological features. Clades FSSC 7, 20 and 43 are here described as the new species N. gamsii, N. suttoniana and N. catenata, respectively. The ex-type strain of Cylindrocarpon tonkinense (CBS 115.40) was found to cluster within FSSC 9, for which the new combination Neocosmospora tonkinensis is proposed. The recently described species ‘F.’ metavorans (Al-Hatmi et al. 2018), is here recombined in Neocosmospora and an emended description is provided.
Fig. 1

Maximum likelihood (RaxML) tree obtained by phylogenetic analysis of the combined EF-1α, ITS, LSU and RPB2 datasets of the genus Neocosmospora. Bootstrap support values from Maximum Likelihood (ML-BS), Maximum Parsimony (MP-BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 70 % and 0.95, respectively, are indicated at the nodes. Nodes with full statistical support (ML-BS = 100, MP-BS = 100 and BS = 1) are indicated by bold branches. Names of new species and new combinations are in bold. Geejayessia atrofusca (CBS 125552) and G. cicatricum (NRRL 22316) were used as outgroup. CBS = Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC = Personal collection of Pedro W. Crous, held at CBS; FRC = Fusarium Research Center housed in The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA; KOD = personal collection of Kerry O’Donnell; NRRL = collections of the Agricultural Research Service, Peoria, IL, USA; All others = as named in O’Donnell's sequence database; ET = ex-(epi-)type strain; T = ex-(holo-)type strain.

Taxonomy and morphology

Based on the phylogenetic evidence and morphological observations compiled here, formal descriptions for the most clinically important unnamed clades in Neocosmospora are provided. In keeping with the current circumscription of the genus (Lombard et al. 2015), new combinations are needed for other clinically relevant species in Neocosmospora. A summary of the main morphological features (Table 2), and a schematic overview comparison (Fig. 2) were produced to facilitate the distinction of the most frequently isolated pathogens within the genus.
Table 2

Main asexual morphological features of the most clinically relevant Neocosmospora species.

Species nameaAerial conidiaSporodochial conidia (number of septa)Chlamydospore diam
N. catenata(0(−1)-septate)N.A.5.5−9.5 μm, smooth-walled
(4.5−)6–9(−11) × (2.5−)3.5−4.5(−6) μm
N. falciformis#,(0−1-septate)(3−4-septate)8−15 μm, rough-walled
4.7–41.8 × 3.1−9.4 μmOverall: 41.7−46.9 × 5.9−6.1 μm
N. gamsii(0(−1)-septate)((3−)4−5(−7)-septate)5.5−8(−9) μm, smooth-walled
(5−)6.5–9.5(−11) × 2.5−3.5(−4.5) μm(3): 35.5−42.5 × 5.5−6 μm
(4): (36−)38.5–59(−63) × 5−5.5(−6) μm
(5): (50.5−)55–66(−71.5) × (4.5−)5−6.5(−7) μm
(6): 67–77.5 × 5.5−6.5 μm
(7): 67.5–71 × 6−7 μm
Overall: (35.5−)51–68(−77.5) × (4.5−)5−6(−7) μm
N. keratoplastica#(0−3-septate)((1−)3−5-septate)6.0−8.0 μm, smooth- to rough-walled
3.1–35.8 × 2.9−6.6 μmOverall: 36.8−43.4 × 5.3−5.7 μm
N. metavorans(0−1(−3)-septate)((1−2−)3−5-septate)5−13.5 μm, smooth-walled
(4−)11–25.5(−35) × (2−)4−6(−7) μm(1): 22.5−25 × 5−5.5 μm
(2): 25.5–27.5 × 6−7 μm
(3): (30.5−)38–46(−47.5) × (5−)5.5−6.5(−7.5) μm
(4): (43−)45–48.5 × (5.5−)6−7(−7.5) μm
(5): (46−)47–51.5(−53) × (5.5−)6−7.5 μm
Overall: (22.5−)38.5–50(−53) × (5−)6−7(−7.5) μm
N. petroliphila#(0(−1)-septate)(3–5-septate)smooth-walled
4.6–24.9 × 2.6−7.1 μmOverall: 44−52.2 × 5.1−5.9 μm
N. solani (0−3(−4−5)-septate)((0−)3−4(−5)-septate)6.5−8.5 μm, rough-walled
(5.5−)13.5–43(−53) × (2−)3−7(−8) μm(3): (24−)36−44(−48) × (2−)4.5−6(−8) μm
(4): (31−)42–48(−52) × (3−)4.5−6(−7.5) μm
(5): (41−)45–51(−56) × (2.5−)4.5−6(−8) μm
Overall: (24−)34–52.5(−56) × (2−)3−7.5(−8) μm
N. suttoniana(0−2(−3)-septate)((3−)5−6-septate)(4.8−)6−8.5(−9.5) μm, verruculose
(6−)7.5–21(−31) × (2.5−)3−5.5(−7.5) μm(3): 30.5−32.5 × 7−7.5 μm
(4): (49−)50–53.5 × 6−6.5 μm
(5): (30.5−)52–71(−77.5) × (6−)7−8 μm
(6): (75−)77–84.5(−86.5) × (6.5−)7−8 μm
Overall: (30.5−)50–75(−86.5) × (6−)7−7.5(−8) μm
N. tonkinensis(0−3(−4)-septate)((1−)3−4(−5)-septate)6.5−10(−12) μm, smooth-walled
(6−)11–24(−37) × (3.5−)4−6(−7) μm(1): 47−51 × 6−7.5 μm
(3): (28−)32.5–42.5(−45.5) × (5.5−)6−7.5 μm
(4): (40.5−)43–48(−49) × 6−7.5 μm
(5): (40−)41.5–52 × 6.9−7.3 μm
Overall: (27.5−)37–48(−50.5) × (5.5−)6−7(−7.5) μm

1 Conidial measurements from: # Short et al. (2013), † Chehri et al. (2015), ‡ Schroers et al. (2016).

Fig. 2

Line drawings comparing the main conidial and chlamydospore features of the most clinically relevant species of Neocosmospora. a. Sporodochial conidia; b. aerial conidia; c. chlamydospores. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Sandoval-Denis & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB822898; Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Neocosmospora catenata. a. Colony on PDA; b. colony on OA; c. colony on CMA; d–g. conidiophores and phialides; h–i. tip of phialides showing apical collarettes; j–k. conidia; l–m. chlamydospores. — Scale bars: h–i = 5 μm; all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. From Latin catena, meaning ‘chain, succession’. Referring to the abundant chains of chlamydospores. Type. USA, Georgia, Stegostoma fasciatum multiple tissues (CBS H-23225 – holotype; CBS 143229 = NRRL 54993 = UTHSC 09-1009 – culture ex-type). Sporulation abundant from conidiophores formed directly on the substrate mycelium. Conidiophores up to 480 μm tall, erect, emerging from the agar surface as single phialides, unbranched or more commonly 1–3-times branched laterally bearing terminal monophialides; phialides subulate, subcylindrical to somewhat acicular, smooth- and thin-walled, (10.5−)32.5–55(−61.5) × (1.5−)2.5–3.5(−4) μm, with distinct periclinal thickening and an apical flared collarette; conidia hyaline, obovate, ellipsoidal to reniform, commonly bent dorsoventrally, smooth- and thin-walled, 0(−1)-septate, (4.5−)6–9(−11) × (2.5−)3.5–4.5(−6) μm, grouped on small false heads on the tip of monophialides. Chlamydospores abundant, subhyaline to pale brown, spherical to subspherical, 5.5–9.5 μm diam, solitary, in pairs, chains or clusters, terminal or intercalary, smooth- and thick-walled. Sporodochia and multiseptate conidia not seen. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA growing in the dark with an average radial growth rate of 2.5–5 and 3.5–5.9 mm/d at 21 and 24 °C, respectively, reaching 74–82 mm diam in 7 d at 24 °C and occupying an entire 9 cm Petri dish in 7 d at 27 °C. Colony surface buff to rosy buff, flat, felty to velvety, radiate, with abundant aerial mycelium; colony margins irregular with abundant submerged mycelium. Reverse straw to buff coloured. Straw to pale sulphur yellow diffusible pigment produced between 21–27 °C, becoming ochreous to umber at 30–33 °C. Colonies on OA incubated at 24 °C in the dark reaching 80–90 mm diam in 7 d. Colony buff to honey, flat, membranous, becoming velvety with the production of short aerial mycelium; margins regular. Reverse buff to honey, without diffusible pigments. A hazel to isabelline pigment can be produced in incubation at 36 °C. On CMA incubated at 24 °C in the dark, cultures occupy an entire 9 mm Petri dish in 7 d. Colony colour sulphur yellow to straw, flat with abundant floccose aerial mycelium. Reverse sulphur yellow to straw without diffusible pigments. Cardinal temperatures for growth — Minimum 12 °C, maximum 36 °C, optimal 24–27 °C. Additional material examined. USA, Georgia, Stegostoma fasciatum multiple tissues (NRRL 54992 = CBS 143228 = UTHSC 09-1008). Notes — Neocosmospora catenata, known from the zebra shark (Stegostoma fasciatum), is well-defined phylogenetically as a fully-supported sister clade to FSSC 12, which is also known mostly from infections of marine animals. No single morphological feature exists allowing a quick phenotypic distinction of FSSC 12 from N. catenata, notwithstanding the tendency of the latter species to produce large, pigmented, catenate to clustered chlamydospores. The two strains studied here consistently failed to produce the characteristic falcate, multiseptate sporodochial conidia typical of the genus. Sporulation was abundant, but strictly microconidial. It is not clear if this phenomenon reflects strain degeneration or if it is a distinctive peculiarity of this clade. The two strains of N. catenata included in this study are, to our knowledge, the only material currently available in fungal collections. Additional isolates are needed to help in evaluating this potentially important differential morphological character. Sandoval-Denis & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB822899; Fig. 4, 5
Fig. 4

Neocosmospora gamsii, asexual morph. a. Colony on PDA; b. colony on OA; c. colony on CMA; d–e. sporodochia formed on the surface of carnation leaves; f–g. sporodochial conidiophores and phialides; h–l. aerial conidiophores and phialides; m. aerial conidia; n–p. chlamydospores; q. sporodochial macroconidia. — Scale bars: d–e = 20 μm; all others = 10 μm.

Fig. 5

Neocosmospora gamsii, sexual morph. a–c. Perithecia; d. perithecium showing a deep-red reaction on 3 % KOH; e. close view of perithecial warts (mounted on water); f. close view of perithecial warts showing a yellow reaction on lactic acid; g. ostiole and periphyses; h–l. asci and ascospores; m–n. ascospores; o. surface view of ascospores. — Scale bars: a–e, g–i = 20 μm; all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. In honour and memory of Walter Gams, eminent mycologist and Fusarium researcher. Type. USA, Pennsylvania, from human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, D.A. Sutton (CBS H-23226 – holotype; CBS 143207 = NRRL 32323 = UTHSC 99-250 – culture ex-type). Sporulation abundant from sporodochia and from conidiophores formed directly on the substrate mycelium. Conidiophores in the aerial mycelium up to 410 μm tall, irregularly or sympodially branched at various levels, bearing terminal monophialides; phialides subulate, subcylindrical or acicular, smooth- and thin-walled, (37.5−)46.5–64(−78) × (2−)2.5–4 μm, with inconspicuous periclinal thickening; collarettes small and barely visible; conidia formed on aerial conidiophores hyaline, ellipsoidal to clavate, sometimes slightly and inequilaterally bent dorsoventrally, smooth- and thin-walled, 0(−1)-septate, (5−)6.5–9.5(−11) × 2.5–3.5(−4.5) μm, single or forming small false heads. Sporodochia at first cream coloured turning green to yellow-blue-green, formed abundantly on the surface of carnation leaves, rapidly confluent. Conidiophores in sporodochia, 23–47.5 μm tall, densely packed, irregularly or verticillately branched, terminal branches bearing 1(−2) monophialides; sporodochial phialides subulate to subcylindrical or doliiform, often slightly constricted or bent in the middle portion, 12–18.5(−24) × (2.5−)3–3.5(−4) μm, smooth- and thin-walled, often showing periclinal thickening and an evident flared collarette. Sporodochial conidia wedge-shaped, medium to robust, with an almost straight to slightly curved ventral line and a gentle, continuous dorsal curvature, tapering and becoming more pronouncedly curved towards the basal and apical levels, apical cell more or less equally sized than the adjacent cell, distinctly hooked with rounded ends and a notched to foot-like basal cell, (3−)4–5(−7)-septate, hyaline, thin- and smooth-walled. Three-septate conidia: 35.5–42.5 × 5.5–6 μm; 4-septate conidia: (36−)38.5–59(−63) × 5–5.5(−6) μm; 5-septate conidia: (50.5−)55–66(−71.5) × (4.5−)5–6.5(−7) μm; 6-septate conidia: 67–77.5 × 5.5–6.5 μm; 7-septate conidia: 67.5–71 × 6–7 μm; overall (35.5−)51–68(−77.5) × (4.5−)5–6(−7) μm. Chlamydospores abundant, spherical to subspherical, 5.5–8(−9) μm diam, solitary or in pairs, terminal and intercalary, smooth- and thick-walled. Perithecia orange to dark brown-red, globose to pyriform, superficial, solitary or gregarious, coarsely warted, glabrous, 186–194 × 138–156 μm; warts 5–20 μm diam, 3.5–16 μm tall. Peridial wall composed of thick-walled cells of textura angularis, (7.5−)11.5–18(−20.5) μm diam. Asci clavate, unitunicate, with a broad and somewhat flattened and simple apex, (70−)72–87.5(−97.5) × (6.5−)7.5–9(−10) μm, ascospores obliquely uniseriate or irregularly biseriate at the apex of the asci. Ascospores obovoid to subfusiform, 1-septate, (9.5−)10.5–11.5(−12.5) × (4.5−)5.0–6.5(−7.5) μm, pale yellow-brown to golden yellow, thick-walled, longitudinally finely striated, often slightly constricted at the septum. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA growing in the dark with an average radial growth rate of 2.5–4.6 and 3.3–5.7 mm/d at 21 and 24 °C, respectively, reaching 76–80 mm diam in 7 d at 24 °C. Colony surface pale luteous to rosy buff, flat, felty with velvety radial patches and abundant floccose white aerial mycelium; colony margins regular. Reverse pale luteous to orange or light scarlet toward the centre of the colony. Yellow to orange-yellow diffusible pigments can be formed at temperatures from 15 to 36 °C, becoming more intense as temperatures exceed 27 °C. Colonies on OA incubated at 24 °C in the dark reaching a maximum of 70–72 mm diam in 7 d. Colony surface pale rosy buff to pale rosy vinaceous, flat and radially folded, moist, bright and membranous, becoming felty to velvety or cottony with the production of abundant, short aerial mycelium often arranged in concentric rings, and becoming compact and restricted at 30–37 °C; margins regular. Reverse rosy vinaceous without diffusible pigments. On CMA incubated at 24 °C in the dark reaching a maximum of 35–40 mm diam in 7 d. Colony colour straw to pale buff with ochreous patches; colony surface flat with abundant submerged mycelium, and with rays of scant aerial mycelium. Reverse, straw to sulphur yellow without diffusible pigments. Cardinal temperatures for growth — Minimum 9 °C, maximum 36 °C, optimal 24–30 °C. Additional material examined. Brazil, substrate, date and collector unknown (CBS 700.86 = NRRL 22236). –Nigeria, from plywood, Feb. 1953, M.B. Schol-Schwarz (CBS 217.53 = NRRL 22655). – USA, Tennessee, from human eye, M. Brandt (CBS 130181 = NRRL 43502); Tennessee, from human eye (CBS 143209 = NRRL 32770 = FRC S-0524); New York, from humidifier coolant (CBS 143211 = NRRL 32794 = FRC S-1152). Notes — This species was previously assigned to clade FSSC 7 in Neocosmospora. Morphologically N. gamsii resembles Fusarium eumartii, a known pathogen of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) and tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum), for which also pathogenicity against pepper (Capsicum anuum) and eggplant (Solanum melongena) has also been demonstrated (Romberg & Davis 2006). Fusarium eumartii, however, has not been fully characterised phylogenetically and lacks authentic living strains for comparison. Two strains previously identified as F. eumartii, CBS 217.53 and CBS 700.86, were found to cluster within FSSC 7. The current concept of F. eumartii, however, based on morphology and host ranges, is polyphyletic, with isolates distributed among at least six monophyletic clades within Neocosmospora (unpubl. data). Neocosmospora gamsii can nonetheless be distinguished morphologically from the concept of F. eumartii, since it produces comparatively thin and short sporodochial conidia, which are also less frequently septate than conidia of F. eumartii and have a more pronounced apical curvature. Among the clinically relevant species, N. gamsii stands out in its long, slender and highly septate (up to 7 septa) sporodochial conidia, comparable to those of N. suttoniana. The latter species, however, produces less frequently septate (up to 6 septa) sporodochial conidia with thick-walls and with a less pronounced overall curvature. It also produces rough-walled chlamydospores distinct from the smooth-walled chlamydospores seen in N. gamsii. So far, this species is known mainly from human clinical specimens, causing mostly eye infections but also recovered from blood samples (Scheel et al. 2013). It was reported as one of many ‘Fusarium’ genotypes recovered from patients affected by a keratitis outbreak in the US (Chang et al. 2006). (Geiser et al.) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB822900 Basionym. Fusarium keratoplasticum Geiser et al., Fungal Genet. Biol. 53: 68. 2013. Synonyms. Cephalosporium keratoplasticum T. Morik, Mycopathologia 2. 66. 1939, nom. nud. (fide Short et al. 2013). Hyalopus keratoplasticum (T. Morik) M.A.J. Barbosa, Notarisia 19. 1941, nom. inval. (fide Short et al. 2013). Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. keratitis Y.N. Ming & T.F. Yu, Acta Microbiol. Sin. 12: 184. 1966. Cylindrocarpon vaginae C. Booth, Y.M. Clayton & Usherw., Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Pl. Sci. 94: 436. 1985. Type. USA, Virginia, Winchester, from indoor plumbing, June 2009 (FRC S-2477 – holotype, metabolically inactive culture deposited at the Fusarium Research Center, ex-type strain: CBS 490.63 = NRRL 22661). Description and illustrations — Short et al. (2013). Notes — This cosmopolitan species is known almost exclusively from infected animals and from biofilms occurring in plumbing systems, including hospital water supplies (Short et al. 2013, 2014), but is also occasionally found in plant material and soil (Chehri et al. 2015, Shaffer et al. 2017). It is regarded as one of the most prevalent fusaria isolated from human disease worldwide, causing mostly corneal infections, but also isolated from blood, nails and skin (O’Donnell et al. 2008, Short et al. 2013). It is also a common species in animal infections, and has been reported from many different species, including mostly aquatic or aquatic-adapted animals such as the black spotted stingray (Taeniura melanopsila) (Fernando et al. 2015), grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) (O’Donnell et al. 2016), hammer-head sharks (Fernando et al. 2015), iguanas (O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2016), lung fish (O’Donnell et al. 2016) and shrimps including Penaeus japonicus and the California brown shrimp (O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2016). It causes extensive egg mortality in the green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas (Sarmiento-Ramírez et al. 2017), and, together with N. falciformis, represents a significant risk for the endangered hawksbill sea turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata (Sarmiento-Ramírez et al. 2014). Terrestrial animals such as equines and Drymarchon corais, the indigo snake, may also be infected (O’Donnell et al. 2016). Reported as having highly variable conidial morphology in culture (Short et al. 2013, 2014), N. keratoplastica frequently produces short, (1–2−)3–5-septate, arcuate sporodochial conidia somewhat reminiscent in shape of those seen in FSSC 12 (Short et al. 2013). However, the latter species produces 1–3-septate and much shorter and thinner sporodochial conidia (overall: (19−)24.5–35(−41) × 5–6(−6.5) vs 13.2–60.1 × 2.8–8.2 in N. keratoplastica). Interestingly, genetic analyses have demonstrated some significant degree of genetic transfer between N. keratoplastica and N. tonkinensis, as shown by perfect sequence matches between the nuclear rDNA regions in some isolates (Short et al. 2014). (C. Massal) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB822901 Basionym. Fusarium lichenicola C. Massal., Ann. Mycol. 1: 223. 1903. Synonyms. Bactridium lichenicolum (C. Massal.) Wollenw., Fusaria autographica delineata 1: no. 456. 1916. Monacrosporium tedeschii A. Agostini, Atti Ist. Bot. Lab. Crittog. Univ. Pavia. 4: 195. 1933. Euricoa dominguiesii Bat. & H. Maia, Anais Soc. Biol. Pernambuco 13: 152. 1955. Hyaloflorea ramosa Bat. & H. Maia, Anais Soc. Biol. Pernambuco 13: 155. 1955. Mastigosporium heterosporum R.H. Petersen, Mycologia 51: 729. 1959. Cylindrocarpon lichenicola (C. Massal.) D. Hawksw., Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 6: 273. 1979. Neocosmospora ramosa (Bat. & H. Maia) L. Lombard & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 80: 227. 2015. non Fusarium lichenicola (Speg.) Sacc. & Trotter, Syll. Fung. 22: 1486. 1913. nom. Illegit. (fide Hawksworth 1979). Selenosporium lichenicola Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Buenos Aires. 20: 459. 1910. Type. Italy, Verona, Tregnago, on Candelaria concolor, Nov. 1902, C. Massalongo (holotype PAD not seen, culture ex-type not known). Description and illustrations — Wollenweber (1916), Petersen (1959), Hawksworth (1979), Summerbell & Schroers (2002). Notes — This species is an infrequent agent of human disease, known from localised and invasive infections such as keratitis (Champa et al. 2013), onychomycosis (Guevara-Suarez et al. 2016), mycetoma (Chazan et al. 2004), intertrigo in warm climates, disseminated infection (Rodriguez-Villalobos et al. 2003) and peritonitis (Liu 2011). In addition, it is acknowledged as a phytopathogenic agent infecting Camellia sinensis (Shaw 1984), and causing corm rot of Colocasia esculenta (Usharani & Ramarao 1981) and fruit rot of pomelo (Citrus maxima) (Amby et al. 2015, Farr & Rossman 2017). Morphologically, it is clearly recognisable in comparison with all other members of the genus in producing ellipsoidal, 0–3-septate aerial conidia that possess a short, truncate base, and that are not curved or pointed like the typical conidia of Neocosmospora species. Sporodochia are not produced. These distinctive features led to the species being transferred in the past to the genus Cylindrocarpon (Hawksworth 1979). Molecular evidence showed, however, it belongs in Neocosmospora (Summerbell & Schroers 2002). (Al-Hatmi et al.) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB823687; Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Neocosmospora metavorans. a. Colony in PDA; b. colony in OA; c. colony in CMA; d–e. sporodochia formed on the surface of carnation leaves; f. sporodochial conidiophore and phialides; g–k. aerial conidiophores and conidia; l–m. aerial conidia; n. chlamydospores; o. sporodochial conidia. — Scale bars: a–b = 20 μm; all others = 10 μm.

Basionym. Fusarium metavorans Al-Hatmi et al., Med. Mycol. 56: S147. 2018. Type. Greece, Athens, from human pleural effusion, 2013, M. Drogari (CBS 135789 – holotype of Fusarium metavorans, maintained as metabolically inactive culture; CBS 135789 – culture ex-type). Original description and illustrations — Al-Hatmi et al. (2018). Emended description — Sporulation abundant from sporodochia and from conidiophores formed directly on the substrate and aerial mycelium. Conidiophores in the aerial mycelium up to 285 μm tall, unbranched, sympodial or irregularly branched up to three times at various levels, bearing terminal and single monophialides; phialides subcylindrical, smooth- and thin-walled, (9−)14–45(−62) × 4–7(−8) μm, with inconspicuous periclinal thickening and somewhat flared collarettes; conidia formed on aerial conidiophores hyaline, ellipsoidal, smooth- and thin-walled, 0–2(−3)-septate, (4−)11–25.5(−35) × (2−)4–6(−7) μm, single or forming small false heads. Sporodochia at first white, turning ochreous when mature, formed abundantly on the surface of carnation leaves and rarely on the agar surface, later clustering into dry pionnotes. Conidiophores in sporodochia 25–50 μm tall, verticillately branched, bearing 1–6 monophialides in terminal verticils; sporodochial phialides subulate to subcylindrical, (11−)13.5–19(−22) × 3–4.5 μm, smooth- and thin-walled, with inconspicuous periclinal thickening and a short, evident, flared collarette. Sporodochial conidia medium to robust, with an almost straight, rarely bent ventral line and a continuous dorsal curvature, wider above the middle portion and tapering toward the basal cell; apical cell equally sized or smaller than the adjacent cell, blunt to slightly hooked with rounded tip; basal cell discretely notched, (1–2−)3–5-septate, hyaline, thin- and smooth-walled. One-septate conidia: 22.5–25 × 5–5.5 μm; 2-septate conidia: 22.5–27.5 × 6–7 μm; 3-septate conidia: (30.5−)38–46(−47.5) × (5−)5.5–6.5(−7.5) μm; 4-septate conidia: (43−)45–48.5 × (5.5−)6–7(−7.5) μm; 5-septate conidia: (46−)47–51.5(−53) × (5.5−)6–7.5 μm; overall: (22.5−)38.5–50(−53) × (5−)6–7(−7.5) μm. Chlamydospores abundant, spherical to subspherical 5–13.5 μm diam, solitary or in pairs, terminal and intercalary, smooth- and thick-walled. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA growing at 24 °C in the dark with an average radial growth rate of 6.3–7.1 mm/d, reaching 44–50 mm diam in 7 d. Colony surface at first white to pale straw coloured, gradually turning pale brick to pale coral, flat, felty to cottony with abundant and short aerial mycelium often arranged in concentric rings; colony margins regular. Reverse white to pale yellow or rust coloured. Colonies on OA and CMA incubated at 24 °C in the dark reaching a maximum of 60–71 and 43–50 mm diam in 7 d, respectively. Colony surface white, pale straw to pale luteous or rust coloured, flat, radiated or radially folded, velvety to cottony with abundant white aerial mycelium; colony margins regular. Reverse at first white, then producing luteous or rust coloured pigments. Cardinal temperatures for growth — Minimum 9 °C, maximum 36 °C, optimal 24–30 °C. Additional material examined. Spain, from human corneal ulcer, 15 Mar. 1978 (CBS 143194 = NRRL 22782 = IMI 226114); from human foot, 14 July 2004, F. Ballester (CBS 143219 = NRRL 46708 = FMR 8634). –Turkey, from human (CBS 143215 = NRRL 37640 = UTHSC R-3564). – USA, Maryland, from human cornea, M. Brandt (CBS 130400 = NRRL 43489); San Francisco, from human eye, 14 Dec. 1970 (CBS 143195 = NRRL 22792 = IMI 153617); from human (CBS 143198 = NRRL 28016); from human (CBS 143199 = NRRL 28017); from human (CBS 143200 = NRRL 28018); from human (CBS 143201 = NRRL 28019); New England, from human bone, A. Fothergill (CBS 143202 = NRRL 28542 = UTHSC 98-1246); Maryland, from human toenail cancer (CBS 143210 = NRRL 32785 = FRC S-1123); Texas, from human eye (CBS 143213 = NRRL 32849 = FRC S-1355); Michigan, from human chest subcutaneous tissue, 2003, M. Brandt (CBS 143216 = NRRL 43717); Illinois, from human, P. Kammeyer (CBS 143218 = NRRL 46237). Notes — One of the most prevalent clades isolated from human clinical specimens, N. metavorans is known to cause superficial and deep-seated or disseminated infections (O’Donnell et al. 2008). This species has been also recovered from insects (Ceresa bubalus, O’Donnell et al. 2012) and from plant material (Chen & Kirschner 2017, Al-Hatmi et al. 2018). It is also one of the few species in Neocosmospora for which a complete genome sequence is available (Coleman 2016, Herr et al. 2016). This species shows a considerable similitude with N. solani and N. suttoniana in overall culture characteristics and the shape of the sporodochial conidia. However, sporodochial conidia in N. metavorans are slightly wider with conspicuously pedicellate basal cells. By contrast, foot cells are less evident in N. solani. Neocosmospora suttoniana can be differentiated by having much longer and septate sporodochial conidia (up 86.5 μm long and 6-septate) as well as by its verruculose chlamydospores (vs up to 53 μm long and 5-septate sporodochial conidia and smooth-walled chlamydospores in N. metavorans). The protologue of N. metavorans also points to a morphological similitude with N. solani s.str. The former species, however, is described as being distinct in the lack of sporodochial conidia and in having conidia in long chains. The ex-type strain of N. metavorans may not produce sporodochial conidia, but all the clinical isolates studied here were able to produce sporodochia and multiseptate conidia under standard culture conditions, while conidial chains, which are not an expected characteristic in this genus, were not observed. A re-examination of the ex-type culture is necessary to further evaluate its description. Moreover, we observed a much wider micromorphological variation among our isolates than was noted by Al-Hatmi et al. (2018), and hence, an emended morphological description and illustrations are provided. (Q.T. Chen & X.H. Fu) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB822902 Basionym. Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. var. petroliphilum Q.T. Chen & X.H. Fu, Acta Mycol. Sin., Suppl. 1: 330. 1987. Synonyms. Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. sp. cucurbitae W.C. Snyder & H.N. Hansen, Amer. J. Bot. 28: 740. 1941. Race 2. Fusarium petroliphilum (Q.T. Chen & X.H. Fu) Geiser et al., Fungal Genet. Biol. 53: 69. 2013. Type. China, from deteriorated petroleum (NF 4475, holotype of F. solani var. petroliphilum, metabolically inactive culture deposited at the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Microbiology, Beijing, not seen; ex-type strain: NF4475 = NRRL 22268 = FRC S-2176). Description and illustrations — Short et al. (2013). Notes — Neocosmospora petroliphila and N. keratoplastica are the two most prevalent fusaria species in human clinical samples and are regarded as the most important agents of keratitis (Zhang et al. 2006, O’Donnell et al. 2007). Other known isolation sites of N. petroliphila from humans include blood (O’Donnell et al. 2008, Ersal et al. 2015), nails (Zhang et al. 2006, Guevara-Suarez et al. 2016), nasal mucosa and skin (Zhang et al. 2006, Ersal et al. 2015). Abiotic environments yielding this fungus include contact lens solution and ceiling plaster (O’Donnell et al. 2008). Neocosmospora petroliphila also occurs as the predominant species producing biofilms in plumbing systems together with N. keratoplastica (Mehl & Epstein 2008, Short et al. 2013). The species can infect animals, mostly those with aquatic habitats, such as cetaceans and fish (O’Donnell et al. 2016). It is a recognised agent of fruit rot on cucurbits (Toussoun & Snyder 1961, O’Donnell 2000). Neocosmospora petroliphila was previously regarded as roughly distinguishable by forming 3–5-septate, falcate, robust sporodochial conidia, which on average were the largest such conidia occurring among the formally described, clinically relevant species known at that time – namely, N. falciformis, N. keratoplastica and N. solani (Short et al. 2013). Two species described here, N. gamsii and N. suttoniana, exhibit sporodochial conidia that are somewhat similar in shape and septation. Those of N. petroliphila, however, can be distinguished by being much shorter than those of N. gamsii and N. suttoniana (overall: 44–52.2 μm long), as well as markedly and regularly curved. Sandoval-Denis & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB822903; Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Neocosmospora suttoniana. a. Colony in PDA; b. colony in OA; c. colony in CMA; d. sporodochia formed on the surface of carnation leaves; e–f. sporodochial conidiophores and phialides; g–j. aerial conidiophores, phialides and conidia; k–l. chlamydospores; m. sporodochial conidia. — Scale bars: d–e = 50 μm; all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. In honour and memory of the clinical mycologist Deanna A. Sutton. Type. USA, Louisiana, from human (CBS H-23224 – holotype; CBS 143214 = NRRL 32858 = FRC S-1423 – culture ex-type). Sporulation abundant from conidiophores formed directly on the substrate mycelium and less often from sporodochia. Conidiophores in the aerial mycelium erect, up to 250 μm tall, commonly solitary and simple, emerging from the agar surface or sporulating at the agar level, rarely 1–3-times branched laterally, bearing terminal monophialides; phialides subulate to subcylindrical, smooth- and thin-walled, (6−)23.5–60.5(−63) × (2−)3–3.5(−4) μm, with conspicuous periclinal thickening and a minute, discreet collarette; conidia formed on aerial conidiophores, hyaline, obovoid, ellipsoidal, clavate to somewhat cylindrical, straight or curved dorsoventrally, smooth- and thin-walled, 0–2(−3)-septate, (6−)7.5–21(−31) × (2.5−)3–5.5(−7.5) μm, single or grouped in false heads at the tip of monophialides. Sporodochia cream to rosy buff coloured, bright, formed scantly and tardily then clustering into dense masses on the surface of carnation leaves. Conidiophores in sporodochia 38–58 μm tall, densely packed, cushion-like, irregularly or verticillately branched, with terminal branches bearing 1–3 monophialides; sporodochial phialides subulate to subcylindrical, often curved near the middle portion, (12−)13.5–19(−22.5) × (2.5−)3–4(−5) μm, smooth- and thin-walled, without periclinal thickening and with an inconspicuous apical collarette. Sporodochial conidia falcate, widest at the central portion or right above it, gently tapering toward the basal part, robust, somewhat straight on both dorsal and ventral lines; dorsal curvature moderate and often not continuous, being more prominent in the apical and basal thirds; apical cell more or less equally sized or smaller than the adjacent cell, bluntly elongated or distinctly hooked; basal cell somewhat papillate to distinctly notched, (3−)5–6-septate, hyaline, thick- and smooth-walled. Three-septate conidia: 30.5–32.5 × 7–7.5 μm; 4-septate conidia: (49−)50–53.5 × 6–6.5 μm; 5-septate conidia: (30.5−)52–71(−77.5) × (6−)7–8 μm; 6-septate conidia: (75−)77–84.5(−86.5) × (6.5−)7–8 μm; overall (30.5−)50–75(−86.5) × (6−)7–7.5(−8) μm. Chlamydospores abundant, spherical to subspherical (4.8−)6–8.5(−9.5) μm diam, solitary or in chains, terminal or intercalary, coarsely roughened to verruculose- and thick-walled. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA growing in the dark with an average radial growth rate of 3.8–5.4 and 5–5.7 mm/d at 21 and 24 °C, respectively, reaching 65–85 mm diam in 7 d at 24 °C. Colony surface straw to olivaceous buff, flat, felty to velvety, aerial mycelium regular, white, formed in radial patches; colony margins regular. Reverse pale luteous to luteous. Pale sulphur yellow to straw diffusible pigments present at 18–36 °C. Colonies on OA and CMA incubated at 24 °C in the dark occupying an entire 9 cm Petri dish in 7 d. Colony colour sulphur yellow to straw, flat, felty to velvety, with rays of abundant aerial mycelium; margins regular. Reverse sulphur yellow to straw, without diffusible pigments. Cardinal temperatures for growth — Minimum 12 °C, maximum 36 °C, optimal 24–33 °C. Additional material examined. Gabon, from human nail, M. Kombila (CBS 124892). – USA, Massachusetts, from human, D.A. McGough (CBS 130178 = NRRL 22608 = UTHSC 93-1547); Georgia, from human blood (CBS 143197 = NRRL 28000); Florida, from human corneal ulcer, D.A. Sutton (CBS 143204 = NRRL 32316 = UTHSC 00-264); Florida, from equine eye (CBS 143224 = NRRL 54972 = UTHSC 05-2900). Notes — Among the newly described species, N. suttoniana, previously assigned to clade FSSC 20 of Neocosmospora is the taxon that most closely resembles N. solani s.str. (Schroers et al. 2016), both species producing mostly 5-septate, robust sporodochial conidia. However, while N. solani produces 0–3–5-septate conidia, N. suttoniana produces much larger, more frequently septate (up to 6 septa) and more distinctly apically curved conidia, the conidial apex being also more elongated than in N. solani and somewhat hooked. In addition, sporodochia in N. suttoniana tend to develop belatedly, often after more than 10 d of incubation. Apical curvature is a common feature of sporodochial conidia among the clinically relevant species of Neocosmospora; however, it is much more noticeable in N. suttoniana and N. gamsii. The last two species are also distinguishable morphologically (see notes under N. gamsii). Comparable shape and degree of septation of the sporodochial conidia are also recorded for ‘Fusarium’ ensiforme which, however, produces overall smaller conidia and smooth-walled chlamydospores (Wollenweber & Reinking 1935) vs the verrucose chlamydospores of N. suttoniana. Other species producing rough-walled chlamydospores are ‘Fusarium’ ventricosum (currently classified as Rectifusarium ventricosum, Lombard et al. 2015) and ‘F.’ solani var. minus (Wollenweber & Reinking 1935), a species rarely reported as an etiologic agent of mycetoma (El-Zaatari & McGinnis 1993). ‘Fusarium’ solani var. minus forms mostly 3-septate sporodochial conidia (full range 3–5-septate vs (3−)5–6-septate in N. suttoniana), smaller (20–41 × 3.5–6 μm vs (30.5−)50–75(−86.5) × (6−)7–7.5(−8) μm in N. suttoniana) and more prominently curved conidia than those of N. suttoniana. In addition, N. suttoniana produces 0–2(−3)-septate aerial conidia (vs 0-septate in ‘F.’ solani var. minus). Neocosmospora suttoniana is an uncommon human pathogenic species, up to now reported from blood and causing eye infections in the USA and Africa (O’Donnell et al. 2008). (Bugnic.) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, comb. nov.— MycoBank MB822904; Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Neocosmospora tonkinensis. a. Colony on PDA; b. colony on OA; c. colony on CMA; d–e. sporodochia formed on the surface of carnation leaves; f. sporodochial conidiophore and phialides; g–l. aerial conidiophores and phialides; m. aerial conidia; n–o. chlamydospores; p. sporodochial conidia. — Scale bars: d–e = 20 μm; all others = 10 μm.

Basionym. Cylindrocarpon tonkinense Bugnic., Encycl. Mycol. 11: 181. 1939. Synonym. Fusarium ershadii Papizadeh et al., Eur. J. Pl. Pathol. doi: 10.1007/s10658-017-1403-6: 5 (2018) (nom. illegit., Art 52.1). Type. Vietnam, Tonkin, from Musa sapientum, 1936, F. Bugnicourt No 498 (IMI 113868 – holotype specimen; CBS 115.40 – ex-type culture of Cylindrocarpon tonkinense). Sporulation abundant from sporodochia, and from conidiophores formed on the substrate and aerial mycelium, abundantly produced on hyphal ropes. Conidiophores in the aerial mycelium erect, up to 214 μm tall, simple or branched, branching irregular or verticillate, bearing terminal, long monophialides; phialides subulate to subcylindrical, straight, smooth- and thin-walled, (42.5−)46.5–63.5 × 3–4(−4.5) μm, periclinal thickening and collarettes inconspicuous; conidia formed on aerial conidiophores hyaline, obovate, clavate to ellipsoidal, straight or slightly curved, smooth- and thin-walled, 0–3(−4)-septate, (6−)11–24(−37) × (3.5−)4–6(−7) μm, single or forming small false heads on the tips of monophialides. Sporodochia at first citrine to hazel coloured turning dark bluish green, brown, vinaceous to purple slate, formed abundantly and clustering on the surface of carnation leaves and on the agar surface. Conidiophores in sporodochia, 22–34.5 μm tall, irregularly or verticillately branched; terminal branches bearing 1–4 monophialides; sporodochial phialides subulate, subcylindrical or somewhat ventricose, often swollen in the middle portion, tapering gently toward the apex (15−)16–20(−21) × (2.5−)3–4.5 μm, smooth- and thin-walled, with inconspicuous periclinal thickening, and a minute and short apical collarette. Sporodochial conidia wedgeshaped, robust, tapering toward the basal cell, with ventral line gently curved, almost straight between the second septum and the apical cell; dorsal curvature continuous, slightly more pronounced towards the apex; apical cell blunt and typically smaller than the adjacent cell; basal cell blunt to distinctly notched, (1−)3–4(−5)-septate, hyaline, thick- and smooth-walled. One-septate conidia: 47–51 × 6–7.5 μm; 3-septate conidia: (28−)32.5–42.5(−45.5) × (5.5−)6–7.5 μm; 4-septate conidia: (40.5−)43–48(−49) × 6–7.5 μm; 5-septate conidia: (40−)41.5–52 × 6.9–7.3 μm; overall (27.5−)37–48(−50.5) × (5.5−)6–7(−7.5) μm. Chlamydospores abundant, spherical to subspherical 6.5–10(−12) μm diam, hyaline to subhyaline, solitary or in pairs, chains or clusters, terminal or intercalary, smooth- and thick-walled. Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA growing in the dark with an average radial growth rate of 3.8–5.1 and 4.3–6 mm/d at 21 and 24 °C, respectively, reaching 76–84 mm diam in 7 d at 24 °C. Colony surface buff, honey with sulphur yellow periphery, flat, felty to floccose, radiated with abundant floccose white to yellow aerial mycelium; colony margins regular, fimbriate. Reverse sulphur yellow to brick coloured. Ochreous to fulvous pigments can be produced between 18–24 °C, a bright yellow pigment is formed between 27–30 °C becoming pale yellow to straw at 36 °C. Colonies on OA and CMA incubated at 24 °C in the dark occupying an entire 9 cm Petri dish in 7 d. Colony colour straw, sulphur to pure yellow, flat, felty, velvety to dusty with abundant short aerial mycelium, margins regular. Reverse sulphur yellow with abundant pure yellow diffusible pigment. Cardinal temperatures for growth — Minimum 9 °C, maximum 36 °C, optimal 27–33 °C. Additional material examined. Netherlands, Leiden, from human cornea, Oct. 2017, M.T. van der Beek (CBS 143038). – USA, Florida, from turtle head lesion (CBS 143208 = NRRL 32755 = FRC S-0452); Ohio, from human cornea (CBS 143217 = NRRL 43811). Notes — Neocosmospora tonkinensis, previously known as FSSC 9, is known to include human pathogens, mostly isolated from corneal specimens (O’Donnell et al. 2008, Muraosa et al. 2017), as well as from animal infections (O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2016). Short et al. (2011) reported also the isolation of this species from water drains in the USA. As already noted by Summerbell & Schroers (2002), the ex-type strain of C. tonkinense (CBS 115.40) clusters within this clade, but is distinctly separated and thus not congeneric with N. lichenicola as previously alleged (Hawksworth 1979). However, the former authors prevented any taxonomical changes arguing for a probable strain transposition since tapering, curved conidia were observed. During our examination of the ex-type culture, however, we also found the presence of multiseptate, almost cylindrical aerial conidia with more or less rounded apices. Although the observed conidia were slightly smaller and less septate than those reported in the protologue of C. tonkinense (Bugnicourt 1939) (overall from the original description 1–7-septate and 13–45 μm long vs 0–3(−4)-septate and (6−)11–24(−37) μm long in the ex-type); they were more similar in size and shape to those reported for the same strain by Booth (1966), thus a redescription and illustration of the species was provided. The observed differences may easily respond to the different culture conditions employed for the original description of C. tonkinense (slices of carrots and potatoes, beans and citrus twigs). Cylindrical aerial conidia of similar characteristic to those reported here were illustrated in the protologue of Fusarium ershadii, a superfluous name based on the ex-type culture of C. tonkinensis (Papizadeh et al. 2018). Similarly, while sporodochia and falcate multiseptate conidia were not observed in the ex-type, they were readily formed in the clinical isolates examined, phylogenetically shown to be conspecific with N. tonkinensis. Sporodochial phialides and conidia strongly resemble those of N. metavorans; however, these species are phylogenetically distant.

DISCUSSION

Neocosmospora is perhaps one of the best examples of a fungal genus undergoing fairly rapid speciation (Rossman et al. 1999). Molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed a hidden diversity of phylogenetic species in this genus. There are currently more than 60 recognised genealogically exclusive lineages, many of them showing pathogenic potential against plants, humans and diverse animals (O’Donnell 2000, Summerbell & Schroers 2002, O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2012, 2016, Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018). Our phylogenetic results were highly consistent with previous phylogenetic analyses (O’Donnell et al. 2008, 2016, Gräfenhan et al. 2011, Schroers et al. 2011, Lombard et al. 2015). Neocosmospora was found to be monophyletic, containing a surprisingly high diversity, with many species still needing a proper study and formal descriptions. Achieving morphological species delimitation and identification in Neocosmospora and related genera is a difficult task, especially among human pathogenic species. Although morphological observations proved to be of great value when the appropriate morphological traits were evaluated under standardised culture conditions, we found notable interspecific differences in conidial dimensions, septation and shape for both aerial and sporodochial conidia. These differences, coupled with other features such as the chlamydospore surface texture, the overall cultural growth characteristics and the host of origin, can be of great value for presumptive identification of human and animal pathogenic species. However, considering that these organisms are highly variable in culture, molecular tools should always be applied, in order to ensure correct identification of the involved species. The general recommendation for clinical microbiologists is to assess species level identification of these pathogens using EF-1α and RPB2 sequences, compared with curated reference sequences deposited in recognised databases as FUSARIUM-ID (http://isolate.fusariumdb.org, Geiser et al. 2004) and Fusarium MLST (http://www.westerdijkinstitute.nl/Fusarium/) (O’Donnell et al. 2015, 2016). As also confirmed here, these two loci have high resolving power and allowed for a correct delimitation of the clinically relevant clades. This was especially true of RPB2, the only gene in our dataset able to identify all the pathogenic species with great certainty. Sexual morphs are not usually found in culture. Only a third of the known Neocosmospora species, mostly plant-pathogenic taxa, have a known sexual morph (O’Donnell 2000, O’Donnell et al. 2008, Coleman 2016). Among the clinically relevant species, only N. keratoplastica, N. petroliphila, and an uncommon species, N. pseudensiformis, have been described with a sexual morph (Nalim et al. 2011, Short et al. 2013). Here, a sexual morph was described for N. gamsii. It was observed only in the ex-type strain and was produced homothallically, after prolonged incubation under standard culture conditions. However, given the infrequent occurrence of sexual structures in Neocosmospora, these features are not reliable in species delimitation (O’Donnell 2000). Neocosmospora catenata was described here without sporodochial conidia, an important morphological feature for generic and, to some extent, specific classification. The lack of macroconidia is not uncommon in fresh Neocosmospora isolates, but in most cases, the production of such structures can be induced using carnation leaf agar or exposure to UV light; these techniques were ineffective in N. catenata. A failure to produce macroconidia should not be regarded as a potential differential character (Leslie & Summerell 2006). Caution is particularly suggested by the knowledge that other Neocosmospora species were originally based on concepts derived from isolates failing to produce macroconidia. For instance, N. falciformis, one the most prevalent fusarial human pathogens (O’Donnell et al. 2008, Guarro 2013) is based on Cephalosporium falciforme, originally described as producing only microconidia grouped in false heads on the tip of thin and elongated monophialides (Carrión 1951). This species was transferred to the genus Acremonium by Gams (1971), partly because of this morphology but also because the human-host-adapted ex-type isolate had a growth rate that fell below Gams’ recognition standard for distinguishing Fusarium isolates. Molecular data, however, showed this species to cluster within the ‘Fusarium’ solani species complex, now Neocosmospora (Summerbell & Schroers 2002). Many fresh isolations of this species have later evidenced the production of distinctive multiseptate conidia, confirming its affinity with Neocosmospora (Edupuganti et al. 2011, Short et al. 2013, Chehri et al. 2015). Similarly, the recently described N. metavorans was characterised as lacking sporodochial conidia (Al-Hatmi et al. 2018). However, sporodochial conidia were readily produced by the large set of human-pathogenic isolates studied here, and the species was appropriately redescribed and illustrated. The highly relevant clade FSSC 12, although included in our phylogenetic analyses, was not linked to a Latin binomial in this study. Members of this clade have been thoroughly evaluated and a formal description is being prepared in a different study (Geiser pers. comm.). Phylospecies FSSC 12 is known to cause lethal animal infections spanning a wide spectrum of host species, particularly aquatic animals held in captivity. Species affected include American lobster (Hamarus americanus) (Lightner & Fontaine 1975), antler crab (Manucomplanus varians), honeycomb cowfish (Acanthostracion polygonius), horseshoe crab, sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) (O’Donnell et al. 2016), kuruma prawn (Penaeus japonicus) (Hatai et al. 1978), lined sea horse (Hippocampus erectus) (Salter et al. 2012), stingray (Taeniura melanopsila), scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) (Fernando et al. 2015) and treefish (Sebastes serriceps) (O’Donnell et al. 2008). The species has also been found in water and sand from human-made aquatic habitats (O’Donnell et al. 2008). The authors of this paper are aware that the generic placement of these taxa is controversial since, to date, two opposite views exist. However, while some researchers have indicated a preference for conserving the generic name Fusarium (= Gibberella) in a broad sense, to also include the genus Neocosmospora, no formal decision has yet been made to conserve the broad definition of Fusarium sensu Geiser et al. (2013), against morphologically and phylogenetically supported genera such as Neocosmospora (Gräfenhan et al. 2011, Schroers et al. 2011, Lombard et al. 2015). The concept espoused by Geiser et al. (2013) is broad and polyphyletic, encompassing an artificial arrangement of many distinct clades/genera with clearly different sexual morphologies. We have employed a taxonomical approach that, in our perspective is based on a sound and more natural classification, based not only in molecular phylogenetic exclusiveness, but also considering holomorphic morphological characters. Clinical microbiologists are encouraged to use up-to-date taxonomy and nomenclature for this fungal group and apply the generic name Neocosmospora, which embraces species demonstrated by substantial morphological and molecular evidence not to be congeneric with their closest relatives in Fusarium (Rossman et al. 1999, Gräfenhan et al. 2011, Schroers et al. 2011, Lombard et al. 2015, Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018).
  69 in total

1.  Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit.

Authors:  Y J Liu; S Whelen; B D Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A mycosis of the American lobster, Homarus americanus, caused by Fusarium sp.

Authors:  D V Lightner; C T Fontaine
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Disseminated infection due to Cylindrocarpon (Fusarium) lichenicola in a neutropenic patient with acute leukaemia: report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  H Rodríguez-Villalobos; A Georgala; H Beguin; C Heymans; G Pye; F Crokaert; M Aoun
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  A large-scale North American study of fungal isolates from nails: the frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns.

Authors:  M A Ghannoum; R A Hajjeh; R Scher; N Konnikov; A K Gupta; R Summerbell; S Sullivan; R Daniel; P Krusinski; P Fleckman; P Rich; R Odom; R Aly; D Pariser; M Zaiac; G Rebell; J Lesher; B Gerlach; G F Ponce-De-Leon; A Ghannoum; J Warner; N Isham; B Elewski
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Analysis of phylogenetic relationship of Cylindrocarpon lichenicola and Acremonium falciforme to the Fusarium solani species complex and a review of similarities in the spectrum of opportunistic infections caused by these fungi.

Authors:  R C Summerbell; H-J Schroers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Genotyping of 44 isolates of Fusarium solani, the main agent of fungal keratitis in Brazil.

Authors:  Patricio Godoy; Josep Cano; Josepa Gené; Josep Guarro; Ana Luisa Höfling-Lima; Arnaldo Lopes Colombo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Experimental murine hyalohyphomycosis with soil-derived isolates of Fusarium solani.

Authors:  Y Sugiura; Y Sugita-Konishi; S Kumagai; E Reiss
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 10.  Human fusariosis.

Authors:  M C Dignani; E Anaissie
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Name Changes for Fungi of Medical Importance, 2018 to 2019.

Authors:  Andrew M Borman; Elizabeth M Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Transcriptional Divergence Underpinning Sexual Development in the Fungal Class Sordariomycetes.

Authors:  Wonyong Kim; Zheng Wang; Hyeonjae Kim; Kasey Pham; Yujia Tu; Jeffrey P Townsend; Frances Trail
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 7.786

3.  Fusarium Keratitis in Taiwan: Molecular Identification, Antifungal Susceptibilities, and Clinical Features.

Authors:  Tsung-En Huang; Jie-Hao Ou; Ning Hung; Lung-Kun Yeh; David Hui-Kang Ma; Hsin-Yuan Tan; Hung-Chi Chen; Kuo-Hsuan Hung; Yun-Chen Fan; Pei-Lun Sun; Ching-Hsi Hsiao
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Diversity and Toxigenicity of Fungi that Cause Pineapple Fruitlet Core Rot.

Authors:  Bastien Barral; Marc Chillet; Anna Doizy; Maeva Grassi; Laetitia Ragot; Mathieu Léchaudel; Noel Durand; Lindy Joy Rose; Altus Viljoen; Sabine Schorr-Galindo
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Transcriptional response of Fusarium oxysporum and Neocosmospora solani challenged with amphotericin B or posaconazole.

Authors:  A Castillo-Castañeda; S J Cañas-Duarte; M Guevara-Suarez; J Guarro; S Restrepo; A M Celis Ramírez
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Characterization of Two Fusarium solani Species Complex Isolates from the Ambrosia Beetle Xylosandrus morigerus.

Authors:  Nohemí Carreras-Villaseñor; José B Rodríguez-Haas; Luis A Martínez-Rodríguez; Alan J Pérez-Lira; Enrique Ibarra-Laclette; Emanuel Villafán; Ana P Castillo-Díaz; Luis A Ibarra-Juárez; Edgar D Carrillo-Hernández; Diana Sánchez-Rangel
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26

7.  No to Neocosmospora: Phylogenomic and Practical Reasons for Continued Inclusion of the Fusarium solani Species Complex in the Genus Fusarium.

Authors:  Kerry O'Donnell; Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi; Takayuki Aoki; Balázs Brankovics; José F Cano-Lira; Jeffrey J Coleman; G Sybren de Hoog; Antonio Di Pietro; Rasmus J N Frandsen; David M Geiser; Connie F C Gibas; Josep Guarro; Hye-Seon Kim; H Corby Kistler; Imane Laraba; John F Leslie; Manuel S López-Berges; Erik Lysøe; Jacques F Meis; Michel Monod; Robert H Proctor; Martijn Rep; Carmen Ruiz-Roldán; Adnan Šišić; Jason E Stajich; Emma T Steenkamp; Brett A Summerell; Theo A J van der Lee; Anne D van Diepeningen; Paul E Verweij; Cees Waalwijk; Todd J Ward; Brian L Wickes; Nathan P Wiederhold; Michael J Wingfield; Ning Zhang; Sean X Zhang
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.389

8.  A 23 bp cyp51A Promoter Deletion Associated With Voriconazole Resistance in Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Neocosmospora keratoplastica.

Authors:  Jasper Elvin James; Erwin Lamping; Jacinta Santhanam; Trudy Jane Milne; Mohd Fuat Abd Razak; Latiffah Zakaria; Richard David Cannon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Characterization of Fungal Endophytes Isolated from the Metal Hyperaccumulator Plant Vachellia farnesiana Growing in Mine Tailings.

Authors:  Giovanni Salazar-Ramírez; Rosario Del Carmen Flores-Vallejo; Julio César Rivera-Leyva; Efraín Tovar-Sánchez; Ayixon Sánchez-Reyes; Julio Mena-Portales; María Del Rayo Sánchez-Carbente; María Fernanda Gaitán-Rodríguez; Ramón Alberto Batista-García; María Luisa Villarreal; Patricia Mussali-Galante; Jorge Luis Folch-Mallol
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-02-08

10.  Malignant Keratitis Caused by a Highly-Resistant Strain of Fusarium Tonkinense from the Fusarium Solani Complex.

Authors:  Jens Schrecker; Berthold Seitz; Tim Berger; Loay Daas; Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann; Claudia Auw-Hädrich; Sabine Schütt; Sabine Kerl; Sascha Rentner-Andres; Herbert Hof
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.