Kim Vriens1,2, Stefan Christen1,2, Sweta Parik1,2,3,4, Dorien Broekaert1,2, Kazuaki Yoshinaga5,6, Ali Talebi7, Jonas Dehairs7, Carmen Escalona-Noguero1,2, Roberta Schmieder1,2, Thomas Cornfield8, Catriona Charlton8, Laura Romero-Pérez9, Matteo Rossi1,2, Gianmarco Rinaldi1,2, Martin F Orth9, Ruben Boon10, Axelle Kerstens11,12, Suet Ying Kwan13, Brandon Faubert14, Andrés Méndez-Lucas15, Charlotte C Kopitz16, Ting Chen17, Juan Fernandez-Garcia1,2, João A G Duarte1,2, Arndt A Schmitz16, Patrick Steigemann16, Mustapha Najimi18, Andrea Hägebarth16, Jo A Van Ginderachter3,4, Etienne Sokal18, Naohiro Gotoh19, Kwok-Kin Wong17, Catherine Verfaillie10, Rita Derua20, Sebastian Munck11,12, Mariia Yuneva15, Laura Beretta13, Ralph J DeBerardinis14,21, Johannes V Swinnen7, Leanne Hodson8, David Cassiman22,23, Chris Verslype22,24, Sven Christian16, Sylvia Grünewald16, Thomas G P Grünewald9,25,26,27, Sarah-Maria Fendt28,29. 1. Laboratory of Cellular Metabolism and Metabolic Regulation, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Laboratory of Cellular Metabolism and Metabolic Regulation, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Belgium. 3. Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 4. Myeloid Cell Immunology Laboratory, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium. 5. Tsukishima Foods Industry, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Cluster of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Fukushima University, Fukushima, Japan. 7. Laboratory of Lipid Metabolism and Cancer, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Belgium. 8. The Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. 9. Max-Eder Research Group for Pediatric Sarcoma Biology, Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 10. Stem Cell Institute, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 11. VIB Bio Imaging Core and VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 12. Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Neuroscience, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 13. Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 14. Children's Medical Center Research Institute, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. 15. The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. 16. Bayer AG, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany. 17. Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, Smilow Research Center, New York, NY, USA. 18. Laboratory of Pediatric Hepatology and Cell Therapy, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain and Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels, Belgium. 19. Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan. 20. Laboratory of Protein Phosphorylation and Proteomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 21. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 22. Department of Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 23. Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 24. Department of Digestive Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 25. Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 26. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Munich, Germany. 27. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 28. Laboratory of Cellular Metabolism and Metabolic Regulation, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium. sarah-maria.fendt@kuleuven.vib.be. 29. Laboratory of Cellular Metabolism and Metabolic Regulation, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Belgium. sarah-maria.fendt@kuleuven.vib.be.
Abstract
Most tumours have an aberrantly activated lipid metabolism1,2 that enables them to synthesize, elongate and desaturate fatty acids to support proliferation. However, only particular subsets of cancer cells are sensitive to approaches that target fatty acid metabolism and, in particular, fatty acid desaturation3. This suggests that many cancer cells contain an unexplored plasticity in their fatty acid metabolism. Here we show that some cancer cells can exploit an alternative fatty acid desaturation pathway. We identify various cancer cell lines, mouse hepatocellular carcinomas, and primary human liver and lung carcinomas that desaturate palmitate to the unusual fatty acid sapienate to support membrane biosynthesis during proliferation. Accordingly, we found that sapienate biosynthesis enables cancer cells to bypass the known fatty acid desaturation pathway that is dependent on stearoyl-CoA desaturase. Thus, only by targeting both desaturation pathways is the in vitro and in vivo proliferation of cancer cells that synthesize sapienate impaired. Our discovery explains metabolic plasticity in fatty acid desaturation and constitutes an unexplored metabolic rewiring in cancers.
Most tumours have an aberrantly activated lipid metabolism1,2 that enables them to synthesize, elongate and desaturate fatty acids to support proliferation. However, only particular subsets of cancer cells are sensitive to approaches that target fatty acid metabolism and, in particular, fatty acid desaturation3. This suggests that many cancer cells contain an unexplored plasticity in their fatty acid metabolism. Here we show that some cancer cells can exploit an alternative fatty acid desaturation pathway. We identify various cancer cell lines, mouse hepatocellular carcinomas, and primary human liver and lung carcinomas that desaturate palmitate to the unusual fatty acid sapienate to support membrane biosynthesis during proliferation. Accordingly, we found that sapienate biosynthesis enables cancer cells to bypass the known fatty acid desaturation pathway that is dependent on stearoyl-CoA desaturase. Thus, only by targeting both desaturation pathways is the in vitro and in vivo proliferation of cancer cells that synthesize sapienate impaired. Our discovery explains metabolic plasticity in fatty acid desaturation and constitutes an unexplored metabolic rewiring in cancers.
Cancer cells display differential usage of SCD-dependent fatty acid desaturation
(Extended Data Figure 1a)3. To illuminate this plasticity, we treated different cancer cells
(liver: HUH7; lung: A549 and H460; prostate: DU145; breast: MDA-MB-468 and T47D) with
the SCD inhibitor Merck Frosst Cpd 3j4, in
conditions of low extracellular fatty acid availability. We observed that they exhibited
a broad sensitivity profile towards SCD inhibition (Figure
1a). Based on this proliferation response, we classified these cancer cells
into SCD-dependent (proliferation inhibition or cell death), partially SCD-dependent
(less than 50% proliferation), or SCD-independent (more than 50% proliferation). Next,
we excluded that the differential dependency of cancer cells on SCD activity was a
result of their individual growth rate, fatty acid synthesis rate, or the degree with
which Merck Frosst Cpd 3j inhibited SCD (Extended Data
Figure 1b-g). Based on these results, we concluded that some cancer cells are
SCD-independent, which cannot be explained by their known fatty acid metabolism.
Consequently, we hypothesized that SCD-independent and partially SCD-dependent cancer
cells exploit an alternative desaturation pathway. We reasoned that the presence of such
an alternative pathway must result in the synthesis of unusual monounsaturated fatty
acids and therefore measured saturated and monounsaturated C12 to C18 fatty acids. In
general, the different cancer cells presented a wide range in total fatty acid
abundance, which did not correlate with SCD independence (Extended Data Figure 1h; Supplementary Table 1a, b). Surprisingly, we discovered an
elevated abundance of the unusual fatty acid sapienate (cis-6-C16:1) in SCD-independent
and partially SCD-dependent cancer cells that increased upon SCD inhibition (Figure 1b; Extended
Data Figure 2a; Supplementary Table 1a, b).
Extended Data Figure 1
SCD-independent cancer cells produce sapienate
(a) Schematic overview of fatty acid metabolism. AcCoA:
Acetyl-coenzyme A; SCD1/5: Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 and 5; Elovl5/6:
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 5 and 6.
(b-e) SCD desaturation activity based on the
palmitoleate to palmitate ratio, oleate to stearate ratio, palmitoleate and
palmitate synthesis upon Merck Frosst Cpd 3j treatment (HUH7, A549: 2 nM;
H460, DU145: 1 nM; MDA-MB-468, T47D: 0.5 nM; panel b-d: n=3;
panel e: HUH7 n=3, A459 n=3, H460 n=6 (control) n=4 (SCD
inhibitor), DU145 n=3, MDA-MB-468 n=5, T47D n=5 (control) n=6 (SCD
inhibitor)). Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests with Holm-Sidak
multiple comparisons.
(f-h) Correlation between SCD independence
and palmitate synthesis, growth rate or total fatty acid abundance (n=3).
SCD independence was defined as area under the cell number curve of Figure 1a. Palmitate synthesis was
derived from (e). Total fatty acid abundance was derived from Extended Data Figure 2a. Trend line
(dashed line) and 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines) are depicted.
Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: others) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent mean ± SD
from biological independent samples.
Figure 1
Some cancer cells desaturate palmitate to sapienate via FADS2
(a) Sensitivity profile of cancer cells treated Merck Frosst Cpd 3j
normalized to control (HUH7 n=6; A459 n=3, H460 n=3, DU145 n=6, MDA-MB-468 n=6,
T47D n=6). Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.
(b) Heat map representing fatty acid abundances normalized to
highest abundance of each fatty acid across all cell lines. Over 90% reduction:
white, no reduction: dark green.
(c) Correlation between SCD independence defined as area under the
cell number curve of (a) and desaturation activity to sapienate (Extended Data Figure 2b). Trend line (dashed
line); 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines). n=3.
(d-f) Sapienate to palmitate ratio of HUH7 subcutaneous xenografts
treated with vehicle (n=8) or Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (n=8; 1.5 mg per kg twice
daily with oral (p.o.) gavage) and in diethylnitrosamine (DEN) or
genetically-induced HCC (normal n=15; DEN n=4); myrAKT-N-Ras (n=10),
Pten (n=8) and Stk (normal n=7; HCC n=6).
Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-test with Welch’s correction.
(g,h) Correlation between FADS2 protein expression and SCD
independence or desaturation activity to sapienate (Extended Data Figure 2b). Trend line (dashed line); 95%
confidence intervals (dotted lines). n=3.
(i,j) FADS2 gene expression in paired samples of
human HCC (n=4) and non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma (n=10)
versus normal adjacent tissue.
(k) Desaturation activity to sapienate in HUH7 and A549 cells with a
non-targeting shRNA or shRNAs targeting FADS2 (n=3). One-way
ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.
(l) Sapienate to palmitate ratio in normal adjacent liver and HUH7
orthotopic liver tumors with non-targeting shRNA or shRNA targeting
FADS2 (n=5). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple
comparisons.
Experiments were performed in low FBS (1%: HUH7; 0.5%: other) with treatment of
72 h. Error bars represent SD (in vitro) or SEM (in
vivo) from mean of biological independent samples (in
vitro) or animals (in vivo).
Extended Data Figure 2
Sapienate is produced via FADS2 in cancer cells
(a) Heat map representing fatty acid abundances
with(out) Merck Frosst Cpd 3j treatment (HUH7, A549: 2 nM; H460, DU145: 1
nM; MDA-MB-468, T47D: 0.5 nM) normalized to highest abundance of each fatty
acid across all cell lines/conditions (Figure
1b, Supplementary Table
1a). Over 90% reduction: white, no reduction: dark
green.
(d) Sapienate to palmitate ratio in HUH7 (n=6)
versus freshly isolated primary human hepatocytes (PHH;
n=3), DU145 (n=6) versus RWPE-1 (n=6) prostate cells, and
MDA-MB-468 (n=6) and T47D (n=6) versus MCF10A (n=6) breast
cells. Unpaired Student’s T-tests and Welch’s correction (HUH7
versus PHH; DU145 versus RWEP-1);
one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons (MDA-MB-468, T47D
versus MCF10A).
(e) Tumor weight of HUH7 subcutaneous xenografts
treated with(out) Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (n=8 one experiment; 1.5 mg per kg
twice daily p.o.). Unpaired Student’s T-test with Welch’s
correction.
(f,g) FADS2 gene
expression in cells with(out) Merck Frosst Cpd 3j as described in (b,c)
normalized to T47D cells (n=3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons (f); unpaired Student’s T-tests with Holm-Sidak multiple
comparisons (g).
(h) FADS2 protein expression in the same conditions as
in (d). Statistics as described in (d). n=3.
(i) FADS2 gene/protein expression in HUH7 and A549
cells upon FADS2 silencing normalized to control (Gene:
HUH7 n=3, A549 n=6; protein n=3 except for A549 shFADS2-2 n=2). One-way
ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.
Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: others) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent SD (in
vitro) or SEM (in vivo) from mean of
biological independent samples (in vitro) or animals
(in vivo).
Sapienate is a major component of human sebum and is to date considered a
specific marker of sebocyte metabolism in the sebaceous glands5,6. Since sebocytes produce
sapienate from palmitate, we determined the desaturation activity from palmitate to
sapienate by assessing the sapienate to palmitate ratio and sapienate biosynthesis. Both
measures increased upon SCD inhibition (with the exception of SCD-dependent T47D cells;
Extended Data Figure 2b, c). Moreover, the
sapienate to palmitate ratio correlated with SCD independence and was higher in
SCD-independent (HUH7) and partially SCD-dependent (DU145) cancer cells compared to
non-transformed cells of the same tissue origin (Figure
1c, Extended Data Figure 2d).
Subsequently, we determined the desaturation activity to sapienate in the HUH7 tumor
xenografts upon SCD inhibition. In agreement with our in vitro data, we
found that SCD inhibition did not significantly alter final tumor weight, but increased
the desaturation activity to sapienate (Figure 1d,
Extended Data Figure 2e). Accordingly, we
observed that (diethylnitrosamine)- and genetically-induced murine HCC exhibited a
significantly elevated desaturation activity to sapienate compared to normal liver
(Figure 1e, f). These data collectively show
that cancer cells, and in particular HCC, can produce sapienate both in
vitro and in vivo.In sebocytes, sapienate is produced by fatty acid desaturase (FADS) 25 (Extended Data
Figure 1a). Therefore, we investigated whether cancer cells exploit FADS2 to
synthesize sapienate. We found that FADS2 gene expression was increased
in SCD-independent and partially SCD-dependent cancer cells compared to SCD-dependent
cells, and in liver and prostate cancer cells upon SCD inhibition (Extended Data Figure 2f, g). Consistently, FADS2 protein expression
correlated with SCD independence and desaturation activity to sapienate in cancer cells
(Figure 1g, h). Moreover, FADS2 protein and
gene expression was elevated in HUH7 and DU145 cancer cells compared to corresponding
non-transformed cells (Extended Data Fig. 2h).
Similarly, FADS2 gene expression was increased in matched pairs of
cancer versus adjacent non-cancerous tissue of HCC (3 out of 4) and non-small cell lung
cancer (8 out of 10) from human patients (Fig. 1i,
j). These data suggest an involvement of FADS2 in sapienate
biosynthesis. Accordingly, FADS2 silencing resulted in a decreased
desaturation activity to sapienate in vitro and in
vivo (Figure 1k, l; Extended Data Figure 2i). These findings demonstrate
that some cancer cells exploit FADS2 to produce sapienate.Next, we investigated whether sapienate biosynthesis causes SCD-independence.
Indeed, sapienate supplementation or FADS2 overexpression in
SCD-dependent MDA-MB-468 cells restored proliferation upon SCD inhibition, i.e. resulted
in SCD-independence (Figure 2a, b; Extended Data Figure 3a). Moreover,
FADS2 silencing combined with SCD inhibition caused proliferation
inhibition or cell death in HUH7 and A549 cells, respectively (Figure 2c, d), whereas sole FADS2 knockdown seem to
increase proliferation in HUH7 cells. These findings indicate that some cancer cells
might rely on the metabolic plasticity provided through simultaneous SCD and FADS2
desaturation activity at the expense of maximized proliferation - a phenomenon that has
been described before7. Subsequently, we assessed
dual inhibition of SCD- and FADS2-dependent desaturation in HUH7 orthotopic liver
xenografts. We found that only dual inhibition of SCD and FADS2 resulted in a
significantly smaller tumor area compared to control tumors (Figure 2e, f). Differently to the in vitro results,
no full inhibition of tumor growth was achieved in vivo, likely due to
the lower in vivo knockdown efficiency and a partial compensation
through extracellular sapienate uptake (Extended Data
Figure 3b-d). An involvement of linoleate (known substrate of FADS2 in
polydesaturation) metabolization in the observed SCD-independence was excluded (Extended Data Figure 3e-h). Taken together, these
data demonstrate that dual activity of SCD- and FADS2-dependent desaturation can provide
metabolic plasticity supporting proliferation, which can be impaired in
vitro and in vivo by combined inhibition of both
pathways.
Figure 2
Sapienate synthesis via FADS2 causes independence from the known
SCD-catalyzed fatty acid desaturation
(a,b) Relative proliferation of MDA-MB-468 control (with or without
sapienate) and FADS2 overexpression cells upon treatment 0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd
3j normalized to control (a: n=9; b: control n=10,
overexpression n=12). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons.
(c,d) Relative proliferation of HUH7 and A549 cells
(with or without sapienate) upon FADS2 knockdown with(out) 2 nM
Merck Frosst Cpd 3j normalized to control (c: control n=9;
shFADS2-1 n=6; shFADS2-2 n=6; d: n=6). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey
multiple comparisons (within different cell lines); one-way ANOVA with
Dunnett’s multiple comparisons (across different cell lines). Only
pair-wise comparisons are depicted.
(e,f) Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin
stain and relative area of resected tumor nodules derived from HUH7 control
(non-targeting shRNA) or FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2-2) orthotopic
liver xenografts in mice treated with vehicle or Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (1.5 mg per
kg twice daily per oral; p.o.; control+vehicle n=13; control+SCD inhibition
n=12; shFADS2-2+vehicle n=12, shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition n=14 of one experiment).
Masks in (e) show the tissue contour and indicating tumor (black), necrotic
(grey) and liver (white) area. Scale bar represents 1,000 µm in all
cases. Box blots in (f) show box extending from the 25th to
75th percentiles, whiskers indicating the minimum and maximum,
and a line indicating the mean. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons.
Experiments were performed in low FBS (1%: HUH7; 0.5%: others) with treatment of
72 h. Error bars represent SD from mean of biological independent samples
(in vitro) or animals (in vivo), unless
stated otherwise.
Extended Data Figure 3
Sapienate rather than arachidonate metabolism causes
SCD-independence
(a) Relative FADS2 gene/protein expression and
desaturation activity to sapienate in MDA-MB-468 control and FADS2
overexpression cells with DMSO or 0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j normalized to
control (n=3). Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-test.
(b) Relative FADS2 gene expression in
tumor nodules from HUH7 control or FADS2 knockdown
orthotopic xenografts with vehicle or Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (1.5 mg per kg
twice daily per oral; p.o.; n=4; one experiment) normalized to control.
One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons.
(c,d) Relative desaturation activity from
palmitate to sapienate or palmitoleate in normal adjacent liver (L) and
tumor nodules (T) in the same model as described in (f) normalized to normal
control livers. Control+vehicle-L n=18 (c) n=20
(d); control+vehicle-T n=18 (c) n=20
(d); control+SCD inhibition-L n=14 (c,
d); control+SCD inhibition-T n=13 (c) n=14
(d); shFADS2-2+vehicle-L n=19 (c,
d); shFADS2-2+vehicle-T n=18 (c,
d); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-L n=15 (c) n=16
(d); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-T n=15 (c,
d); two experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s
multiple comparisons.
(e,f) Desaturation activity from linoleate
to γ-linolenate based on the γ-linolenate to linoleate ratio
and arachidonate abundance in HUH7 and A549 control (non-targeting shRNA)
and FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2) cells (n=3). One-way ANOVA
with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.
(g,h) Linoleate and arachidonate abundance
in normal adjacent murine liver and tumor nodules from HUH7 control
(non-targeting shRNA) or FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2)
orthotopic xenografts treated with vehicle or Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (1.5 mg
per kg twice daily per oral; p.o.). Control+vehicle-L n=12 (g)
n=14 (h); control+vehicle-T n=13 (g) n=14
(h); control+SCD inhibition-L n=14 (g) n=15
(h); control+SCD inhibition-T n=14 (g) n=16
(h); shFADS2-2+vehicle-L n=14 (g) n=16
(h); shFADS2-2+vehicle-T n=13 (g) n=15
(h); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-L n=15 (g) n=18
(h); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-T n=15 (g) n=16
(h); two experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s
multiple comparisons.
Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1% : HUH7;
0.5% : others) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent SD (in
vitro) or SEM (in vivo) from mean of biolocial
independent samples (in vitro) or animals (in
vivo).
An important fate of fatty acids is membrane synthesis, for which fatty acids are
often elongated. Accordingly, we observed carbons of sapienate in its elongation product
cis-8-octadecenoate (cis-8-C18:1; Extended Data Figure
4). In line with sapienate elongation, cis-8-octadecenoate abundance was
higher in SCD-independent cells than in SCD-dependent cells, increased in HUH7 and A549
cells upon sapienate supplementation or SCD inhibition, and decreased upon
FADS2 silencing (Figures 3a,
b; Extended Data Figure 5a-c; Supplementary Table 1c,
d). Consistently, cis-8-octadecenoate supplementation rescued the
proliferation of SCD-dependent MDA-MB-468 cells and FADS2 knockdown
cells (HUH7, A549) upon SCD inhibition (Extended Data
Figure 5d-f). We then determined whether sapienate is used for membrane
synthesis. FADS2 silencing altered the overall composition of
membrane-bound phospholipids, decreased the fraction of phospholipids built from
sapienate and increased phospholipids built from the SCD product palmitoleate in HUH7
and A549 cells (Figure 3c; Extended Data Figure 6a-e; Supplementary Table 1e). The opposite change
occurred upon SCD inhibition (Figure 3d, e).
Functionally, these changes in membrane composition resulted in a trend toward decreased
membrane fluidity and significantly increased resistance to lipid peroxidation in
FADS2 knockdown cells (Extended Data
Figure 6f, g). Thus, these data show that some cancer cell lines elongate
sapienate and use it for membrane biosynthesis.
Extended Data Figure 4
Carbons from sapienate are detected in octadecenoate
(a-f) 13C enrichment of palmitate or
stearate from 13C6 glucose in HUH7 or A549 cells in
control condition (ethanol, black) or upon 12C sapienate
supplementation (blue). Cells were grown in 10% dialyzed FBS DMEM containing
4.5 g per L 13C6 glucose for 1 week, after which cells
were grown for 72 h in 0.5% FBS DMEM containing 4.5 g per L
13C6 glucose supplemented with ethanol or 20
µM 12C sapienate.
The purpose of this experiment was to trace the incorporation of
carbons from sapienate into cis-8-octadecenoate. Palmitate and stearate were
measured as controls. Since 13C-labeled sapienate is not
commercially available, we performed a reverse labeling in which we
pre-labeled HUH7 and A549 cells with 13C6-glucose to
enrich cis-8-octadecenoate with 13C. Then, we supplemented these
cells with unlabeled sapienate in the presence of
13C6-glucose and determined the 13C
enrichment of octadecenoate. If sapienate is elongated to
cis-8-octadecenoate, we expect a shift in the 13C enrichment from
higher to lower octadecenoate isotopologues. Indeed, we found that
supplementation of unlabeled sapienate shifted the 13C enrichment
accordingly (a, d). Moreover, the largest 13C
enrichment increase was found in the M+2 isotopologue, indicating the
elongation of unlabeled sapienate to octadecenoate with 13C
labeled acetyl-CoA. As expected, sapienate supplementation did not or only
marginally change the 13C enrichment of palmitate and stearate
(b,c,e,f).
Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests; n=3. Error bars
represent mean ± SD from biological independent samples.
Figure 3
Sapienate and its elongation product cis-8-octadecenoate are used in membrane
synthesis
(a,b) Relative fatty acid abundances in HUH7 and A549
cells treated 2 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (n=3). Data were normalized to the
respective controls.
(c) Palmitoleate and sapienate abundances in membrane phospholipids
in HUH7 cells with non-targeting shRNA and an shRNA targeting
FADS2 (n=4).
(d,e) Relative phospholipid-bound palmitoleate, sapienate and
cis-8-octadecenoate abundances in HUH7 and A549 cells treated with control or 2
nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j normalized to control (n=2 in e
sapienate+SCD inhibitor; n=3 in all other cases,). BDL denotes ‘below
detection limit’. When the respective control was BDL, the data were
normalized to the total abundance of all fatty acids measured and are
represented in arbitrary units.
Experiments were performed in low FBS (1% : HUH7; 0.5% : others) with treatment
of 72 h. Error bars represent SD from mean of biological independent samples.
Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests.
Extended Data Figure 5
Sapienate is elongated to cis-8-octadecenoate
(a) Relative cis-8-octadecenoate abundances in cancer
cells normalized to T47D cells. HUH7 n=3; A549 n=3, H460 n=5, DU145 n=3,
MDA-MB-468 n=5, T47D n=5. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons.
(b,c) Relative cis-8-octadecenoate
abundances in HUH7 and A549 control (non-targeting shRNA) and
FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2) cells in control condition
(ethanol) or upon 20 µM sapienate supplementation normalized to
control. HUH7: control n=6 (ethanol) n=3 (sapienate); shFADS2-1 n=3;
shFADS2-2 n=6 (ethanol) n=3 (sapienate); A549: control n=6; shFADS2-1 n=3;
shFADS2-2 n=3. Data values are shown in Supplementary Table 1c,
d. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons.
(d) Relative proliferation of MDA-MB-468 cells with
ethanol (n=9) or 20 µM cis-8-octadecenoate (n=3) upon treatment with
DMSO or 0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j. Data were normalized to control with
error bars representing SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple
comparisons.
(e,f) Relative proliferation of HUH7 and
A549 control (non-targeting shRNA) and knockdown (shFADS2) cells with
ethanol or 20 µM cis-8-octadecenoate upon treatment with DMSO or 2 nM
Merck Frosst Cpd 3j. HUH7: control n=9; shFADS2-1 n=6; shFADS2-2 n=9; A549:
EtOH n=6; cis-8-C18:1 n=3. Data were normalized to control. Two-way ANOVA
with Tukey multiple comparisons. Only statistics for pair-wise comparisons
are depicted.
Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: all other cancer cells) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent
mean ± SD from biological independent samples, unless otherwise
noted.
Extended Data Figure 6
Sapienate and cis-8-octadecenoate are used in membranes
(a-d) Heat map representing abundance changes of
phosphatidylcholine (a), phosphatidylethanolamine
(b), phosphatidylserine (c) and
phosphatidylinositol (d) species in control and
FADS2 knockdown HUH7 and A549 cells relative to
control. HUH7: control n=3; shFADS2-1 n=4; shFADS2-2 n=5; A549: n=5. Only
significant differences are depicted as log2 fold change compared
to control. X denotes blank or excluded values. Phospholipid species
carrying sapienate or palmitoleate are depicted in bold red and listed in
Supplementary Table
1e. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons.
(e) Relative distribution of phospholipid species in
HUH7 (n=2) and A549 (n=5) cell with non-targeting shRNA (control). PC:
phosphatidylcholine; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PS: phosphatidylserine;
PI: phosphatidylinositol; SM: sphingomyelin.
(f) Membrane fluidity based on the ordered to
disordered ratio in HUH7 and A549 with a non-targeting shRNA (control;
black) or two different shRNA targeting FADS2 (brown and orange) normalized
to control (n=4). The higher the ordered to disordered ratio, the more
saturated lipids are present in the membrane. One-way ANOVA with
Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.
(g) Lipid peroxidation sensitivity via MDA assay in
HUH7 with a non-targeting shRNA (control; black) or two different shRNA
targeting FADS2 (brown and orange) normalized to control (n=3). Cells were
treated with vehicle or 5 µM RSL3, the latter inhibiting glutathione
peroxidase 4 and inducing lipid peroxidation. Two-way ANOVA with
Sidak’s multiple comparisons.
Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: all other cancer cells) with treatment of 72 h. Data are presented as
mean ± SD from biological independent samples.
Finally, we asked whether sapienate metabolism also occurs in primary human
cancers. We measured the ratio of sapienate to palmitate in cancer and normal lung and
liver tissue as well as blood plasma from human subjects. Blood plasma was from healthy
volunteers or cancer patients, while normal lung and liver was obtained from adjacent
non-cancerous tissue from cancer patients and non-transplanted donor organs,
respectively. In addition, we determined the palmitoleate to palmitate ratio in the same
tissues and blood plasma samples as a readout of the SCD-dependent fatty acid
desaturation pathway. Strikingly, we found that only in cancer tissue, but not in normal
tissue, the sapienate to palmitate ratio was significantly increased compared to the
blood plasma ratio (Figure 4a, b). Accordingly, the
sapienate to palmitate ratio was higher in cancer tissue compared to normal tissue
(Figure 4a, b). The increase in the sapienate
to palmitate ratio was more pronounced than the corresponding change in the palmitoleate
to palmitate ratio when comparing cancer and normal tissue (Figure 4a, b). This suggests a specific increase in sapienate
biosynthesis in these cancers, rather than a general increase in the synthesis of
monounsaturated fatty acids. Taken together, these data provide evidence that sapienate
metabolism occurs in vivo in primary lung and liver carcinomas from
human patients.
Figure 4
Evidence for sapienate synthesis in primary human cancers
(a) Sapienate to palmitate and palmitoleate to palmitate ratios in
HCC and normal liver tissue as well as in blood plasma from humans. Blood plasma
was from healthy volunteers or liver cancer patients, while normal liver was
adjacent non-cancerous tissue from liver cancer patients and non-transplanted
donor livers (normal: blood plasma n=23, tissue n=16 and cancer: blood plasma
n=33, tissue n=16). Grey indicates blood plasma and black indicates tissue.
Notably, blood plasma ratios from healthy volunteers are the same as in Figure
4b.
(b) Sapienate to palmitate and palmitoleate to palmitate ratios in
lung cancers and normal lung tissue as well as in blood plasma from humans.
Blood plasma was from healthy volunteers or cancer patients, while normal lung
was adjacent non-cancerous tissue from cancer patients (normal: blood plasma
n=23, tissue n=15 and cancer: blood plasma: n=34, tissue n=15). Grey indicates
blood plasma and black indicates tissue. Notably, blood plasma ratios from
healthy volunteers are the same as in Figure 4a.
(c) Sapienate metabolism is an alternative monodesaturation
pathway.
Two-Way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons. Error bars represent SEM of mean
from different individuals.
So far, the well-characterized SCD-dependent fatty acid desaturation pathway was
considered to be the only source of de novo generated monounsaturated
fatty acids in cancer cells8. Here, we discovered
that cancer cells can rewire their fatty acid metabolism and desaturate palmitate to the
unusual fatty acid sapienate (Figure 4c).
Particularly, we find evidence for sapienate metabolism in human lung and liver
carcinoma. This finding can explain metabolic plasticity and demonstrates heterogeneity
in the fatty acid desaturation metabolism of cancer cells. While we find that sapienate
and cis-8-octadecenoate can support membrane synthesis, it is tempting to speculate that
sapienate and its elongation products impact the known fatty acid and lipid signaling
networks of cancer cells9–11. Consequently, this could provide cancer cells
with a hitherto unexplored possibility to deregulate signaling networks, opening new
opportunities to understand and target them. In conclusion, our discovery increases the
current understanding of fatty acid metabolism in cancers and suggests sapienate
biosynthesis as an alternative source of monounsaturated fatty acids.
Experimental Procedures
Cell lines, cell culture and chemicals
All cell lines were confirmed to be mycoplasma free based on the
MycoAlert™ Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Human
HEK293T epithelial cells, RWPE-1 prostate cells, MCFl0A breast cells, A549 and
H460 lung carcinoma, MDA-MB-468 and T47D breast adenocarcinoma, and DU145
prostate carcinoma cell lines were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). HUH7
liver carcinoma cell line was obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research
Bioresources (JCRB) Cell Bank (Osaka, Japan). Cell lines have not been
authenticated with the exception of MDA-MB-468 cells which were authenticated by
fingerprinting. RWPE-1 cells were cultured in keratinocyte serum-free medium
(K-SFM), supplemented with 0.05 mg per mL bovine pituitary extract, 5 ng per mL
epidermal growth factor, 1% penicillin (50 U per mL) and 1% streptomycin (50
µg per mL) (all Life Technologies, CA, USA). MCF10A cells were cultured
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-F12 (DMEM-F12) (Life
Technologies, CA, USA), supplemented with 5% horse serum (Life Technologies, CA,
USA), 1% penicillin (50 U per mL) (Life Technologies, CA, USA), 1% streptomycin
(50 µg per mL) (Life Technologies, CA, USA), 0.5 μg per mL
hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), 100 ng per mL cholera toxin
(Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), 10 μg per mL insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA),
and 20 ng per mL recombinant human epidermal growth factor (PeproTech EC,
London, UK). Other cells were cultured in high glucose (4.5 g per L)
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies, CA,
USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, MA,
USA), 1% penicillin (50 U per mL) (Life Technologies, CA, USA) and 1%
streptomycin (50 µg per mL) (Life Technologies, CA, USA). For growth and
labeling experiments, low serum conditions (0.5-1% FBS) were applied.
13C6-glucose (CLM-1396 Cambridge Isotope Laboratories,
MA, USA) was used for labeling experiments. Hygromycin B and puromycin
dihydrochloride (Life Technologies, CA, USA) were added to the growth medium for
selection of overexpression and knockdown cell lines, respectively. Merck Frosst
Cpd 3j4 was used as an SCD inhibitor, as described in the patent
application WO2006/130986. The fatty acids palmitoleate (16:1) and oleate (18:1)
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA). Cis-8-octadecenoate (18:1) was
purchased from Larodan (Solna, Sweden) and sapienate (16:1, hexadecenoic acid
cis-6) from Matreya LLC. Solvents for metabolite extraction and mass
spectrometry were HPLC grade from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA).
Knockdown and overexpression strategies
FADS2 knockdown cell lines were generated using the
shRNA-expressing lentiviral pLKO1-puro vector with a puromycin selection
cassette (Plasmid #8453; Addgene, MA, USA). Clone IDs for shRNAs were as
follows: shFADS2-1 (TRCN0000064755; sequence:
CCGGCCACGGCAAG-AACTCAAAGATCTCGAGATCTTTGAGTTCTTGCCGTGGTTTTTG) and shFADS2-2
(TRCN0000064757; sequence:
CCGGCCACCTGTCTGTCTACAGAAACTCGAGTTTCTGTAGA-CAGACAGGTGGTTTTTG) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO,
USA). A scrambled shRNA, i.e. TRC1 sequence:
AACAAGATGAAGAGCACCAA was used as a negative control for FADS2
knockdown cells. FADS2 overexpression cell lines were generated
using the pLVX-IRES-Hyg vector with a hygromycin selection cassette (Clontech
Laboratories Inc., CA, USA). An empty pLVX-IRES-Hyg vector served as a negative
control for FADS2 overexpression. Lentiviruses were produced by
transfection of HEK293T cells. Transduction of cells was performed overnight and
the medium was replaced the next day. Poly-clonal cells were selected for 1-2
weeks with puromycin in the case of knockdown cells or with hygromycin in the
case of overexpression before experiments were performed. All knockdown and
overexpression cell lines were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
and proteomic analysis (Extended Data Figure
2i, 3a). Primers for
FADS2 were designed to amplify a cDNA segment in the
sequence as follows: forward primer
5’-gaccacggcaagaactcaaag-3’ and reverse
primer 5’-gagggtaggaatccagccatt-3’. For
SCD1, the forward and reverse primer used were
5’-tctctgctacacttgggagc-3’ and
5’-gagctttgtaagagcggtgg-3’,
respectively. Relative gene transcript levels were compared to the control gene
RPL-19, with 5’-attggtctcattggggtctaac-3’ and
5’-agtatgctcaggcttcagaaga-3’ as forward and reverse primer,
respectively. Real-time PCR reactions were performed on a 7,500 Fast Real-Time
PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies). Amplification was performed
at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1
min at 60 °C. Samples were assayed in triplicates.
Quantification of FADS2 gene expression in primary
tumors
Human HCC and adjacent normal liver tissue samples were retrieved from
the archive of the Institute of Pathology of the LMU Munich with approval of the
LMU Munich’s ethics committee (approval no. 307-16 UE). Representative
tumor and normal tissue areas were reviewed by a resident pathologist in
representative tissue slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
Corresponding areas were micro-dissected from paraffin blocks using biopsy
punches (2 mm diameter). Deparaffinization of the tissue and RNA isolation was
carried out using the Formapure Total Kit (Beckman Coulter). cDNA synthesis was
performed using 1 µg of RNA with the MultiScribe Reverse Transcription
kit (Applied Biosystems). Analysis of the gene expression of
FADS2 was performed by qRT-PCR using SYBR-Green Master Mix
(Applied Biosystems) in a CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad). Primers were
used at a concentration of 0.5 µM in a final reaction volume of 15
µl. Three technical replicates were analyzed per sample.
RPLP0 expression was used as a control for normalization.
Primer sequences were as follows: FADS2 forward primer
5′-gaccacggcaagaactcaaag-3′ and reverse primer
5′-gagggtaggaatccagccatt-3′; RPLP0 forward primer 5′-
gaaactctgcattctcgcttc-3′ and reverse primer 5′-
ggtgtaatccgtctccacag -3.Human lung adenocarcinoma (NSCLC) and adjacent normal lung samples were
retrieved from patients enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol, after obtaining
informed consent (ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: NCT02095808). Based on pre-operative imaging and gross inspection at
resection, viable fragments of tumor and lung were sampled. RNA isolation was
carried out using the Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) and
FastPrep®-24 (MPbio, CA, USA). cDNA synthesis was performed using 1
µg of RNA with the qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (QuantaBio, MA, USA).
Analysis of FADS2 gene expression was performed by qRT-PCR
using Platinum® SYBR® Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, MA, USA) on a Viia7 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Life
Technologies). Amplification was performed at 95°C for 10 min, followed
by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. Primers for
FADS2 were designed to amplify a cDNA segment in the
sequence as follows: forward primer
5’-gaccacggcaagaactcaaag-3’ and reverse
primer 5’-gagggtaggaatccagccatt-3’.
Relative gene transcript levels were compared to the control gene
RPL-19, with 5’-attggtctcattggggtctaac-3’ and
5’-agtatgctcaggcttcagaaga-3’ as forward and reverse primer,
respectively. Samples were assayed in triplicates.
Growth and labeling experiments
Cancer cells were seeded in the wells of 12-well plates (Corning, NY,
USA) at either 7×104 cells per well (HUH7, A549, H460 and
DU145), 1.5×105 cells per well (MDA-MB-468) or
2×105 cells per well (T47D) in low FBS DMEM (1.5 mL per
well) and grown in a humidified environment at 37 °C with 5%
CO2. For HUH7, 1% FBS was considered low FBS DMEM; for all other
cell lines, 0.5% FBS was used. Low FBS (0.5-1%) DMEM contains a total of
4.31-8.62 µM fatty acids, with palmitate, oleate and stearate being the
most abundant fatty acids (Extended Data Figure
7a). After 24 h, the medium was aspirated, cells were washed with
DPBS, and low FBS DMEM (4.5 g per L glucose for growth experiments or 4.5 g per
L 13C6-glucose for labeling experiments, including fatty
acid synthesis assessment) supplemented with 0.1% DMSO (control) or Merck Frosst
Cpd 3j (either at 0.5 nM, 1 nM or 2 nM concentration dissolved in DMSO) was
added to the wells (1.5 mL per well). Treatment was carried out for 72 h, during
which cells were grown in a humidified environment at 37 °C with 5%
CO2. For growth experiments, cells were counted prior to
treatment (initial count) and 72 h after treatment (final count) using a MoxiTM
Z Mini Automated Cell Counter (Orflo Technologies, ID, USA) or a
Countess™ II Automated Cell Counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA)
following trypsinization. Cell number change was calculated by subtracting the
initial count from the final count, and was subsequently normalized to control
condition, unless stated otherwise. For labeling experiments, cells were washed
with saline solution after treatment and metabolism was quenched by
flash-freezing the plates in liquid nitrogen. Plates were stored at –80
°C until metabolite extraction. All experiments were performed in
triplicates. Key experiments were confirmed in a more physiological blood-like
medium (BLM)12,13 with low FBS (Extended
Data Figure 7b-h).
Extended Data Figure 7
SCD independence and sapienate metabolism occur in medium with glucose
and amino acid concentrations that are similar to physiological
conditions
(a) Fatty acid concentrations of FBS (fetal bovine
serum; n=4). Low FBS condition (0.5-1% FBS) corresponds to a total fatty
acid concentration of 4.31-8.62 µM.
(b) Sensitivity profile of cancer cells to Merck Frosst
Cpd 3j (white; HUH7, A549: 2 nM; H460, DU145: 1 nM; MDA-MB-468, T47D: 0.5
nM) in blood-like medium (BLM)12,13 normalized to
control. HUH7 n=3; A549 n=3; H460 n=6; DU145 n=6, MDA-MB-468 n=3; T47D n=9.
Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.
(c, d) Sensitivity profile of HUH7 and
A549 control (non-targeting shRNA; black) and knockdown (shFADS2; brown and
orange) cells treated with DMSO (dark bars) or 2 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j
(light bars) in blood-like medium (BLM)12,13 normalized to
control (n=3). Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons.
(e) Sensitivity profile of MDA-MB-468 control (black)
and FADS2 overexpression (green) cells DMSO (dark bars) or
0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (light bars) in blood-like medium (BLM)12,13 normalized to control (n=3). Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak
multiple comparisons.
(f) Desaturation activity to sapienate based on the
sapienate to palmitate ratio in cancer cells in conditions as described in
(b). n=3. Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests with Holm-Sidak
multiple comparisons.
(g,h) Desaturation activity from palmitate to sapienate
based on the sapienate to palmitate ratio in the same conditions as
described in (c-f). n=3. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons (g); unpaired Student’s T-test (h).
Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS BLM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: all other cancer cells) with treatment of 72 h. Data are presented as
mean ± SD from biological independent samples.
For rescue experiments, cells were seeded and grown as described above.
After 24 h, the medium was replaced by medium containing 0.1% DMSO (control) or
Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (0.5 nM, 1 nM or 2 nM), supplemented with either 1% ethanol
(control) or 20 µM palmitoleate (cis-9-16:1), sapienate (cis-6-16:1),
oleate (cis-9-18:1) or cis-8-octadecenoate (cis-8-C18:1) dissolved in ethanol.
Cells were counted prior to treatment and 72 h after treatment using a MoxiTM Z
Mini Automated Cell Counter (Orflo Technologies, ID, USA) or a Countess™
II Automated Cell Counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) following
trypsinization, and relative cell number changes were calculated as described
above. All experiments were performed in triplicates. Changes in intracellular
fatty acid abundance upon supplementation were confirmed by mass spectrometry
(Supplementary Table
1c, d).Primary hepatocytes of one donor were obtained from the Hepatocytes and
Liver Stem Cell Bank, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels, Belgium. Cells
were thawed using the Corning® Gentest™ High Viability
CryoHepatocyte Recovery Kit (Corning, NY, USA). Cells were then plated on
collagen I-coated 6-well plates at a density of 1.4×106 cells
per well, and left to attach for 8 h in Corning Plating Medium (Corning, NY,
USA).
Reverse labeling experiments
HUH7 and A549 cells were seeded at 1×106 cells per
flask in T75 flasks in low FBS (1% FBS, HUH7) or 10% FBS (A549) DMEM and grown
as described above. After 24 h, the medium was aspirated, cells were washed with
DPBS and 1% (HUH7) or 10% (A549) dialyzed FBS DMEM (4.5 g per L
13C6-glucose) was added to the cells. Cells were
cultured for 1 week (medium was replaced every 3 d) to fully label all cellular
metabolites. Next, cells were trypsinized, washed and seeded in the wells of a
12-well plate at 7×104 cells per well in low FBS DMEM
containing 4.5 g per L 13C6-glucose (1% FBS for HUH7 and
0.5% FBS for A549). After 24 h, the medium was aspirated, cells were washed with
DPBS and low FBS DMEM containing 4.5 g per L 13C6-glucose
(1% FBS for HUH7 and 0.5% FBS for A549) supplemented with either 1% ethanol
(control) or 20 µM 12C sapienate (cis-6-16:1) dissolved in
ethanol was added to the cells (1.5 mL per well). Treatment was carried out for
72 h. After treatment, cells were washed with saline solution and metabolism was
quenched by flash-freezing the plates in liquid nitrogen. Plates were stored at
-80 °C until metabolite extraction. All experiments were performed in
triplicates.If fully labelled cells use 12C sapienate, a decrease in the
13C enrichment will be observed in the metabolites into which
sapienate is incorporated, such as cis-8-octadecenoate. Since our GC-MS setup
does not allow for separation of cis-8 and cis-9-octadecenoate, and our GC-FID
setup does not allow for assessment of 13C enrichment, we opted to
assess the 13C enrichment in the pool of octadecenoate (consisting of
cis-8 and cis-9-octadecenoate) via GC-MS. Note that only cis-8-octadecenoate,
and not cis-9-octadecenoate, can result from sapienate metabolism. Hence, a
decrease in 13C enrichment in the octadecenoate pool indicates the
incorporation of 12C sapienate into cis-8-octadecenoate.
Metabolite extraction and metabolite measurement
Metabolite extractions were performed using the methods described in
Christen et al. and Lorendeau et al. 14,15. Briefly, for 12-well cell culture plates containing
1-5×105 cells per well, the medium was aspirated, cells
were washed with blood bank saline, and cell metabolism was quenched by
flash-freezing the plates in liquid nitrogen. Next, 400 µL –20
°C cold 65% methanol was added to the wells, cells were scraped with a
pipet tip and suspensions were transferred to Eppendorf tubes. Next, 250
µL –20°C cold chloroform was added and samples were
vortexed at 4 °C for 10 min to extract metabolites. Phase separation was
achieved by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min, after which the chloroform
phase (containing the total fatty acid content) was separated and dried by
vacuum centrifugation. For tissue samples, tissues were weighed (5-10 mg) and
pulverized (Cryomill, Retsch) under liquid nitrogen conditions. For plasma
samples, 10 µL (murine) or 50 µL (human) of cold plasma was
transferred to an Eppendorf tube. Next, 800 µL –20 °C cold
65% methanol was added to the samples, followed by 500 µL –20
°C cold chloroform. Samples were then handled as described above. Dried
fatty acid samples were immediately processed to fatty acid methyl esters as
described below, thereby avoiding degradation.Total fatty acid samples were esterified with 500 µL 2% sulphuric
acid in methanol for 180 min at 60 °C or overnight at 50°C and
extracted by addition of 600 µL hexane and 100 µL saturated
aqueous NaCl. Samples were centrifuged for 5 min and the hexane phase was
separated and dried by vacuum centrifugation. Samples were resuspended in
hexane, after which isotopologue distributions of fatty acids were measured with
a 7890A GC system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) combined with a 5975C or a
7000 inert MSD system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). One microliter of each
sample was injected in splitless (5975C) or 5:1 split (7000) mode with an inlet
temperature of 270 °C onto a DB35MS column (Agilent Technologies, CA,
USA). Helium was used as a carrier gas with a flowrate of 1 mL per min. The oven
was held at 80 °C for 1 min and ramped with 5 °C per min to 300
°C. The MS system was operated under electron impact ionization at 70 eV
and a mass range of 100-650 amu was scanned. Evidence for separation of
cis-6-C16:1 and cis-9-C16:1 is presented in Extended Data Figure 8a. Isotopologue distributions were extracted
from the raw chromatograms using an in-house Matlab script. Correction for
naturally occurring isotopologues was achieved using Isocor software. Palmitate,
palmitoleate and sapienate synthesis were calculated based on isotopologue
distributions of the according fatty acid, using Isotopomer Spectral Analysis
(ISA)16 and an in-house Matlab
script. For determination of relative metabolite abundances, the total ion
counts were normalized to an internal standard (pentadecanoate or
heptadecanoate) and the cell number or protein content for cell extracts. For
tissue extracts, the total ion counts were normalized to the internal standard
(pentadecanoate or heptadecanoate) and tissue weight. The desaturation activity
from palmitate to sapienate or palmitoleate was calculated by dividing the
normalized total ion count of sapienate or palmitoleate by the normalized total
ion count of palmitate.
Extended Data Figure 8
Separation and detection of sapienate and cis-8-octadecenoate
(a) Separation and detection of sapienate
(cis-6-hexadecenoate) and palmitoleate (cis-9-hexadecenoate) via gas
chromatography mass spectrometry. Separation was optimized using a standard
mix containing pentadecanoate, sapienate, palmitoleate, palmitate,
cis-8-octadecenoate, oleate, vaccinate, linoleate and stearate (upper
panel), and the method was subsequently validated by measurement of these
fatty acids in biological samples. A representative biological sample is
presented in the lower panel.
(b) Separation and detection of cis-8-octadecenoate,
oleate (cis-9-octadecenoate) and vaccinate (cis-11-octadecenoate) via gas
chromatography flame ionization detector. Separation was optimized using a
standard mix containing cis-8-, cis-9- and cis-11-octadecenoate (upper
panel), and the method was subsequently validated by measurement of these
fatty acids in biological samples. A representative biological sample is
presented in the lower panel.
Cis-8-octadecenoate abundances were measured with a gas
chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) system (TRACE GC ULTRA, Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA). One microliter of each sample was injected
onto a SLB-IL111 capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.20µm
thickness, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) with an inlet temperature of 250 °C.
Helium was used as a carrier gas at 1.2 mL per min and the oven temperature was
maintained isothermally at 140 °C. cis-C18:1 isomers (∆8,9,11)
were synthesized as described before17,
processed to fatty acid methyl esters, and used for validation of the separation
of cis-C18:1 isomers and confirmation of the retention times of respective
cis-C18:1 fatty acid methyl esters. Evidence for separation of cis-8-C18:1 and
cis-9-C18:1 is presented in Extended Data Figure
8b. For determination of relative cis-8-octadecenoate abundances, the
total ion counts were normalized to the internal standard (pentadecanoate or
heptadecanoate). For cell extracts, total ion counts were further normalized to
the protein content or to the total fatty acid abundance. Total ion counts in
tissue samples were further normalized to tissue weight.
FADS2 protein analysis
Human cell pellets (1-4×107 cells per pellet) in
triplicate were lysed in a urea lysis buffer containing 8 M urea and 20 mM HEPES
pH 8.0. Cell pellets were homogenized by sonication on a Diagenode Bioruptor
Plus instrument using the following settings: high intensity power output, 10
cycles of 30 sec ON/30 sec OFF pulses, 4 °C water bath. The protein
concentration in each lysate was measured by Bradford (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA,
USA) and aliquots containing 100 µg of protein were used for further
analysis. Proteins were reduced by addition of DTT to a concentration of 5 mM
and incubation for 30 min at 55 °C. Next, proteins were alkylated by
addition of iodoacetamide to a concentration of 10 mM for 15 min at room
temperature in the dark. Samples were diluted with 20 mM HEPES pH 8.0 to a urea
concentration of 4 M and proteins were digested with 1 µg lysyl
endopeptidase (Wako Chemicals, DA, USA) (1/100, w/w) for 4 h at 37 °C.
Samples were further diluted with 20 mM HEPES pH 8.0 to a final urea
concentration of 2 M and proteins were digested with 1 µg trypsin
(Promega, WI, USA) (1/100, w/w) overnight at 37 °C. The resulting peptide
mixture was purified using OMIX C18 pipette tips (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA)
or SampliQ SPE C18 cartridges (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) and 100 µg
of peptides of each sample were dried completely by vacuum drying and stored at
–20 °C until further use.Peptides were re-suspended in loading solvent (0.1% TFA in
water/acetonitrile, 98/2 (v/v)) and 3 µg was injected for LC−MS/MS
analysis on an Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano LC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA)
in-line coupled to a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
MA, USA). The peptides were first loaded on a trapping column (made in-house,
100 μm internal diameter (I.D.) × 20 mm, 5 μm beads C18
Reprosil-HD, Dr. Maisch, Germany) and after flushing from the trapping column,
peptides were separated on an analytical column in the needle (made in-house, 75
μm I.D. × 400 mm, 1.9 μm beads C18 Reprosil-HD, Dr. Maisch)
using a non-linear 150 min gradient of 2 to 56% solvent B (0.1% formic acid in
water/acetonitrile, 20/80 (v/v)) at a constant flow rate of 250 nL per min and
at a constant temperature of 50 °C (CoControl 3.3.05, Sonation).
Following a 10 min wash reaching 99% solvent B, the column was re-equilibrated
with solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water).The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent, positive
ionization mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS acquisition for
the 16 most abundant peaks in a given MS spectrum. The source voltage was set to
2.5 kV and the capillary temperature was 250 °C. One MS1 scan (m/z
375-1500, AGC target 3E6 ions, maximum ion injection time of 60 ms), acquired at
a resolution of 60,000 (at 200 m/z) was followed by up to 16 tandem MS scans,
acquired at a resolution of 15,000 (at 200 m/z) of the most intense ions
fulfilling predefined selection criteria: AGC target 1E5 ions, maximum ion
injection time of 80 ms, isolation window of 1.5 m/z, fixed first mass of 145
m/z, spectrum data type: centroid, under fill ratio 2%, intensity threshold
1.3×104, exclusion of unassigned and singly charged
precursors, peptide match preferred, exclude isotopes on, dynamic exclusion time
of 12 s. The normalized collision energy was set to 28% and the
polydimethylcyclosiloxane background ion at 445.12003 Da was used for internal
calibration (lock mass).Data analysis was performed by MaxQuant (version 1.6.1.0) using the
Andromeda search engine with default search settings including a false discovery
rate set at 1% on both the peptide and protein level. Spectra were searched
against the human proteins in the Swiss-Prot database (database release version
of December 2017 containing 20,243 human protein sequences, downloaded from
www.uniprot.org). The mass tolerance for precursor and fragment
ions was set to 4.5 and 20 ppm, respectively, during the main search. Enzyme
specificity was set as C-terminal to arginine and lysine (trypsin), also
allowing cleavage at arginine/lysine-proline bonds with a maximum of two missed
cleavages. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine residues was set as a fixed
modification and variable modifications were set to oxidation of methionine
residues (to sulfoxides) and acetylation of protein N-termini. Proteins were
quantified by the MaxLFQ algorithm integrated in the MaxQuant software. Only
proteins with at least one unique or razor peptide were retained for
identification, while a minimum ratio count of two unique peptides was required
for quantification. The obtained LFQ intensity values of FADS2 were used to
quantify the protein and compare FADS2 levels between different samples.
Analysis of phospholipid-bound sapienate and palmitoleate
HUH7 cells carrying a non-targeting shRNA or a shRNA targeting
FADS2 (shFADS2-2) were seeded in T75 flasks, allowed to
attach for 24 h and subsequently grown for 72 h in 1% FBS DMEM. Cells were
trypsinized, washed with blood bank saline and re-suspended in TAG lysis buffer
(1% IGEPAL® CA-630 (Nonidet P-40), 50 mM Trizma® hydrochloride and
150 mM sodium chloride). Lipids were extracted from cell lysate according to the
Folch method18. An internal standard
containing a known concentration of 1,2-Diheptanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(17:0) was added to samples prior to extraction to allow the quantification of
total phospholipids. Lipid fractions were separated by thin-layer chromatography
and fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared as previously described19,20. Separation and detection of total phospholipid FAMEs was
achieved using a 6890N Network GC System (Agilent Technologies; CA, USA) with
flame ionization detection. FAMEs were identified by their retention times
compared to a standard containing 31 known fatty acids and quantified in
micromoles from the peak area based on their molecular weight. The micromole
quantities were then totaled and each fatty acid was expressed as a percentage
of this value (molar percentage; mol%) or µg fatty acids normalized to
cellular protein concentration.
Analysis of phospholipid species
HUH7 and A549 cells carrying a non-targeting shRNA or a shRNA targeting
FADS2 (shFADS2-1 and shFADS2-2) were seeded in T75 flasks,
allowed to attach for 24 h and subsequently grown for 72 h in low FBS DMEM (1%
FBS for HUH7; 0.5% FBS for A549). Cells were trypsinized, washed three times
with cold DPBS, and cell pellets were re-suspended in 0.8 mL DPBS. Lipid
extraction and MRM-based phospholipid (semi)quantification analysis was
performed as described previously21.
Briefly, 0.7 mL of homogenized cells were mixed with 0.9 mL MeOH:HCl (1N) (8:1),
0.8 mL CHCl3 and 200 μg per mL of the antioxidant
2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (Sigma). The organic
fractions were evaporated under vacuum using a Savant Speedvac spd111v (Thermo
Fisher Scientific) at room temperature and the remaining lipid pellet was stored
at -20 °C under argon. Prior to mass spectrometry analysis, lipid pellets
were reconstituted in running solution
(CH3OH:CHCl3:NH4OH; 90:10:1.25; v/v/v).
Lipid standards PC25:0, PC43:6, SM30:1, PE25:0, PE43:6, PI25:0, PI31:1, PI43:6,
PS25:0, PS31:1 and PS37:4 (Avanti Polar Lipids) were added based on the amount
of DNA of the original sample. Phospholipids were analyzed by electrospray
ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) on a hybrid quadrupole linear
ion trap mass spectrometer (4000 QTRAP system, AB SCIEX) equipped with a
TriVersa NanoMate robotic nanosource (Advion Biosciences) for automated sample
injection and spraying as described22.
Phospholipid profiling was executed by (positive or negative) precursor ion or
neutral loss scanning at a collision energy of 50 eV/45 eV, 35 eV, −35 eV
and −60 eV for precursor 184 [sphingomyelin (SM)/phosphatidylcholine
(PC)], neutral loss 141 [phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)], neutral loss 87
[phosphatidylserine (PS)] and precursor 241 [phosphatidylinositol (PI)],
respectively. Phospholipid quantification was performed by multiple reaction
monitoring (MRM), the transitions being based on the neutral losses or the
typical product ions as described above. Typically, a 3 min period of signal
averaging was used for each spectrum. The data were corrected for carbon isotope
effects and chain length and analyzed using in house-developed software (RALP).
As a background, the intensities of species detected in the ‘internal
standards only’ spectra were considered after being divided by the ion
suppression factor of each sample. The ion suppression factor was calculated for
each sample separately by dividing the intensity of the standards in the
‘internal standards only’ spectrum by the intensity of the
standards in the sample spectrum. Only the phospholipid species displaying an
intensity of at least 5 times the blank value were taken into account. In order
to quantify the total amount of phospholipids in a phospholipid class, the
abundances of individually measured species within the phospholipid class were
totalled. Data were normalized based on DNA amount. MRM-based analysis of the
C16:1 containing phospholipids was based on Ekroos et al23.
Analysis of lipid peroxidation sensitivity
3×107 HUH7 control and FADS2
knockdown cells were seeded in 15 cm Petri dishes in 1% FBS DMEM. After 24 h,
cells were treated with control or 5 µM RSL3, the latter inhibiting
glutathione peroxidase 4 and inducing lipid peroxidation. Lipid peroxidation was
quantified using the MDA assay kit (Sigma) according to manufacturer’s
instructions with some exceptions. Briefly, 3×107 cells were
collected in BHT supplemented PBS. TBA-acetic acid solution was buffered to pH
3.5. Plates were read using an EnSpire Multimode Plate Reader (PerkinElmer).
Signal was normalized to total amount of sample DNA.
Analysis of membrane fluidity
HUH7 and A549 control and FADS2 knockdown cells were
grown on glass coverslips (n=4) in low FBS DMEM (1% FBS for HUH7; 0.5% FBS for
A549) for 3 d and subsequently fixed for 15-30 min in 4% PFA at room
temperature. For lipid phase analysis, cells were stained with di-4-ANEPPDHQ
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's
specifications. For imaging, a Nikon A1R confocal microscope attached to Ti
eclipse outfitted with a Plan Apo VC 60x lens oil immersion lens with an NA of
1.4 was used (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The spectral detector was set to
530-590 and 590-650 nm to image the spectral shift of the dye from lipid ordered
to disordered phase. Resulting images were analyzed with NIS software (Nikon
Instruments, NY, USA), thereby segmenting the cells in the images and
calculating the ordered to disordered ratio24. The higher the ordered to disordered ratio, the more saturated
lipids are present in the membrane. Per coverslip, 10 fields of views were
imaged.
Mouse models
All animal experiments were approved by the local authorities in
compliance with all relevant ethical regulations (including but not limited to
tumor size). For injection models, mice were randomized before injection of
cancer cells. All samples were analyzed blinded. Sample size was determined
using power calculations with B=0.8 and P<0.05 based on preliminary data
and in compliance with the 3R system: Replacement, Reduction, Refinement.
Subcutaneous HUH7 xenograft model
Mice were fed ad libitum a CRM (E) expanded low-fat
diet (Special Diets Services 801730) one week prior to the start of the
experiments until sacrificing. 1×106 HUH7 cells were
subcutaneously injected in 50% Matrigel™, (BD Biosciences), 50% cell
culture medium without FCS into 8-9-week old female immunocompromised
NMRI mice (Taconic M&B AS,
Ejby, Denmark). Tumors were allowed to grow up to a mean tumor size of 30
mm2 (length × width), before mice were allocated to
treatment and control group by stratified randomization based on their
primary tumor size (8 animals per group). Tumor-bearing mice were either
treated with vehicle (10% v/v ethanol, 40% v/v solutol) alone or with 1.5 mg
per kg SCD inhibitor Merck Frosst Cpd 3j for six consecutive days twice
daily per oral (p.o.). After the last treatment, mice were euthanized and
tumors were harvested and snap-frozen for further analyses. Humane endpoints
were determined as a tumour size of 225 mm2. Following symptoms
were monitored and upon detection of one of the symptoms the animal was
euthanized: Ulcerated tumours, loss of 20 % body weight, self-mutilation,
constant circling, constant curved posture, blood attachment at body
openings, bloody diarrhea, abnormal breathing, constant eye and nasal
discharge, apathic, constantly cramps, constant tremble, crouching posture,
self-isolation. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the
European Union directives and the German animal welfare act and approved by
the Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales (LAGeSo, Berlin,
Germany).
DEN-induced hepatocellular carcinoma model
Male C57Bl/6N mice were obtained from the KU Leuven animal facility
and injected with diethylnitrosamine (DEN) (25 mg per kg) intraperitoneally
at the age of 14 d. After 4 weeks, mice were fed with a 13 kJ% fat diet
(Ssniff S8655-E220) until sacrificed and analyzed at 20, 30, 31 or 32 weeks
after DEN administration. Tumor and non-tumor tissues were collected and
rapidly frozen for metabolomic analysis using a liquid nitrogen cooled
Biosqueezer (Biospec Products). Tissues were weighed (5-10 mg) and
pulverized (Cryomill, Retsch) under liquid nitrogen conditions. The
pulverized tissues were extracted for GC-MS analysis as described above.
Humane endpoints were determined as follows: Liver tumours can be detected
by palpation as hard masses in otherwise soft abdominal area or by an
enlarged abdomen at later stages. A 20% increase in the normal abdomen
diameter was considered as a humane endpoint. Following symptoms were
monitored and upon detection of one of the symptoms the animal was
euthanized: loss of ability to ambulate, loss of skin elasticity, laboured
respiration, or weight loss over 20% of initial body weight. Housing and
experimental animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal
Care and Research Advisory Committee of the KU Leuven, Belgium.
Hepatocyte-specific Pten and Stk knockout hepatocellular carcinoma
model
mice were fed standard chow ad libitum throughout
the procedure. C57BL/6 mice carrying Pten conditional
knockout alleles were crossed with Albumin (Alb)-Cre-transgenic mice.
Control animals were PtenloxP/loxP;
Alb-Cre—, whereas the experimental mice were
PtenloxP/loxP; Alb-Cre+
(HepPten—). For hepatocyte-specific
Stk3 and Stk4 deletion, mice carrying
Stk3 and Stk4 conditional knockout
alleles (in a mixed background of CD1, C57BL/6 and 129) were crossed with
Albumin (Alb)-Cre-transgenic mice. Control animals were
Stk3loxP/loxP;
Stk4loxP/loxP; Alb-Cre—,
whereas the experimental mice were
Stk3loxP/loxP;
Stk4loxP/loxP; Alb-Cre+. At
necropsy (approximately 12 months for Pten and 4-6 months
for Stk), tumors and liver tissues were harvested and
snap-frozen for further analysis from male mice. Humane endpoints were
determined as follows: Maximum tumour size was based on linear or volumetric
measurements. When linear measurements are used, the longest dimension of
the tumour should not exceed 2.0 cm in mice. If multiple tumours are
present, the combination of the two longest diameters may not exceed 2.0 cm
for mice. Tumor volume (TV) can also be used to evaluate tumour size using
the following formula: TV = (width)2 x length/2. Maximum single tumour size
or tumour burden for mice is 2000 mm3. All animal procedures were
approved by and carried out in accordance with the policies and regulations
set forth by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at MD
Anderson Cancer Center.
Hepatocyte-specific myrAKT-N-Ras overexpression hepatocellular carcinoma
model
wild-type FVB/N mice were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington,
MA) and subjected to hydrodynamic injection. Briefly, 10 μg of the
plasmids encoding myr-AKT1 and/or N-RasV12 along with sleeping beauty
transposase in a ratio of 25:1 were diluted in 2 mL saline (0.9% NaCl),
filtered through a 0.22 μm filter, and injected into the lateral tail
vein of 6 to 8-week-old FVB/N male mice in 5 to 7 sec. After 6-9 weeks,
tumors were harvested and snap-frozen for further analysis. Humane endpoints
were determined as follows: Liver tumours can be detected by palpation as
hard masses in otherwise soft abdominal area or by an enlarged abdomen at
later stages. When a tumour was first noticed it was recorded. A 20%
increase in the normal abdomen diameter was considered as a humane endpoint.
Mice were housed, fed, and monitored in accordance with protocols approved
by the Committee for Animal Research at the University of California, San
Francisco.
Orthotopic HUH7 liver cancer model
Mice were fed ad libitum a CRM (E) expanded low-fat
diet (Special Diets Services 801730) one week prior to the start of the
experiments until sacrificing. Next, 0.5x106 HUH7 control or
shFADS2-2 cells were orthotopically injected in 100% Matrigel™, (BD
Biosciences) into the left liver lobe of anesthetized (3% isoflurane, 2%
oxygen) 6-week-old male immunocompromised
NMRI mice (Taconic M&B AS, Ejby,
Denmark). For analgesia, mice were given 5 mg per kg carprofen subcutaneous
before and after surgery and for the following 3 d. After 8 d, mice were
either treated with vehicle (10% v/v ethanol, 40% v/v solutol) alone or with
1.5 mg per kg SCD inhibitor Merck Frosst Cpd 3j for six consecutive days
twice daily per oral (p.o.). Fourteen hours after the last treatment, mice
were euthanized, the tumor nodule was resected, and blood and normal liver
tissue were sampled. For metabolomic analysis, half of the tumor nodule and
non-tumor tissues were rapidly frozen using a liquid nitrogen cooled
Biosqueezer (Biospec Products). Tissues were then weighed (5-10 mg) and
pulverized (Cryomill, Retsch) under liquid nitrogen conditions. The
pulverized tissues were extracted for GC-MS analysis as described above. For
histological quantification of the tumor area, half of the nodule was
formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE). From these FFPE tissue blocks,
4 µm sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The
mean tumor area in percent of the total tissue area was determined in
low-power magnifications by two independent physicians trained in
histopathology. Humane endpoints were determined as a tumour size of 2
cm3. Following symptoms were monitored and upon detection of
one of the symptoms the animal was euthanized: Loss of ability to ambulate,
laboured respiration, surgical infection or weight loss over 10 % of initial
body weight. Housing and experimental animal procedures were approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee of the KU Leuven,
Belgium.
Collection of clinical samples
Human samples were collected upon ethical approval of local authorities.
Analysis was performed blinded. Patient information is provided in Supplementary Table
2.
Liver
Liver and/or liver cancer samples were obtained from Indivumed GmbH
(Hamburg, Germany), from the Laboratory of Hepatology (Commissie Medische
Ethiek UZ Leuven – KU Leuven, Belgium), and the archive of the
Institute of Pathology of the LMU Munich with approval of the LMU
Munich’s ethics committee (approval no. 307-16 UE), respecting
patients’ rights. Blood samples from healthy volunteers and HCC
patients were collected in collaboration with the Laboratory of Hepatology
(UZ Leuven – KU Leuven, Belgium) after obtaining informed consent.
Freshly isolated primary hepatocytes (donor F125) were obtained from the
Hepatocytes and Hepatic Stem Cells Bank from the Cliniques Universitaires St
Luc, Brussels, Belgium. An agreement from the Belgian Ministry of Health was
obtained for the Hepatocytes and Hepatic Stem Cells Bank. A written and
signed informed consent has been obtained for collection of the cells.
Lung
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled in an
IRB-approved protocol after obtaining informed consent (ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: NCT02095808). Study eligibility included pulmonary masses
measuring 1 cm or more in diameter. Standard surgical procedures were
followed, with the majority of cases being robotic lobectomies. Based on
pre-operative imaging and gross inspection at resection, viable fragments of
tumor and lung were sampled. Plasma samples from lung cancer patients were
drawn primarily from an arterial line throughout the procedure.
Statistical analysis and software
Statistical data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad
Software Inc., CA, USA) on n≥3 biological replicates. Details on
statistical tests and post-tests are presented in the figure legends. Detection
of mathematical outliers was performed using Grubb's test. Sample size
for all in vitro experiments was chosen empirically. For
in vivo experiments, sample size was determined using power
calculations with β=0.8 and P<0.05, based on
preliminary data. Data are presented as mean ± SD, or as mean ±
SEM, as indicated in the figure legends. Where applicable custom codes are
available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
SCD-independent cancer cells produce sapienate
(a) Schematic overview of fatty acid metabolism. AcCoA:
Acetyl-coenzyme A; SCD1/5: Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 and 5; Elovl5/6:
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 5 and 6.(b-e) SCD desaturation activity based on the
palmitoleate to palmitate ratio, oleate to stearate ratio, palmitoleate and
palmitate synthesis upon Merck Frosst Cpd 3j treatment (HUH7, A549: 2 nM;
H460, DU145: 1 nM; MDA-MB-468, T47D: 0.5 nM; panel b-d: n=3;
panel e: HUH7 n=3, A459 n=3, H460 n=6 (control) n=4 (SCD
inhibitor), DU145 n=3, MDA-MB-468 n=5, T47D n=5 (control) n=6 (SCD
inhibitor)). Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests with Holm-Sidak
multiple comparisons.(f-h) Correlation between SCD independence
and palmitate synthesis, growth rate or total fatty acid abundance (n=3).
SCD independence was defined as area under the cell number curve of Figure 1a. Palmitate synthesis was
derived from (e). Total fatty acid abundance was derived from Extended Data Figure 2a. Trend line
(dashed line) and 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines) are depicted.Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: others) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent mean ± SD
from biological independent samples.
Sapienate is produced via FADS2 in cancer cells
(a) Heat map representing fatty acid abundances
with(out) Merck Frosst Cpd 3j treatment (HUH7, A549: 2 nM; H460, DU145: 1
nM; MDA-MB-468, T47D: 0.5 nM) normalized to highest abundance of each fatty
acid across all cell lines/conditions (Figure
1b, Supplementary Table
1a). Over 90% reduction: white, no reduction: dark
green.(b,c) Desaturation activity to sapienate upon Merck
Frosst Cpd 3j treatment (HUH7, A549: 2 nM; H460, DU145: 1 nM; MDA-MB-468,
T47D: 0.5 nM; n=3). Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests with
Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons.(d) Sapienate to palmitate ratio in HUH7 (n=6)
versus freshly isolated primary human hepatocytes (PHH;
n=3), DU145 (n=6) versus RWPE-1 (n=6) prostate cells, and
MDA-MB-468 (n=6) and T47D (n=6) versus MCF10A (n=6) breast
cells. Unpaired Student’s T-tests and Welch’s correction (HUH7
versus PHH; DU145 versus RWEP-1);
one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons (MDA-MB-468, T47D
versus MCF10A).(e) Tumor weight of HUH7 subcutaneous xenografts
treated with(out) Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (n=8 one experiment; 1.5 mg per kg
twice daily p.o.). Unpaired Student’s T-test with Welch’s
correction.(f,g) FADS2 gene
expression in cells with(out) Merck Frosst Cpd 3j as described in (b,c)
normalized to T47D cells (n=3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons (f); unpaired Student’s T-tests with Holm-Sidak multiple
comparisons (g).(h) FADS2 protein expression in the same conditions as
in (d). Statistics as described in (d). n=3.(i) FADS2 gene/protein expression in HUH7 and A549
cells upon FADS2 silencing normalized to control (Gene:
HUH7 n=3, A549 n=6; protein n=3 except for A549 shFADS2-2 n=2). One-way
ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: others) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent SD (in
vitro) or SEM (in vivo) from mean of
biological independent samples (in vitro) or animals
(in vivo).
Sapienate rather than arachidonate metabolism causes
SCD-independence
(a) Relative FADS2 gene/protein expression and
desaturation activity to sapienate in MDA-MB-468 control and FADS2
overexpression cells with DMSO or 0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j normalized to
control (n=3). Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-test.(b) Relative FADS2 gene expression in
tumor nodules from HUH7 control or FADS2 knockdown
orthotopic xenografts with vehicle or Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (1.5 mg per kg
twice daily per oral; p.o.; n=4; one experiment) normalized to control.
One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons.(c,d) Relative desaturation activity from
palmitate to sapienate or palmitoleate in normal adjacent liver (L) and
tumor nodules (T) in the same model as described in (f) normalized to normal
control livers. Control+vehicle-L n=18 (c) n=20
(d); control+vehicle-T n=18 (c) n=20
(d); control+SCD inhibition-L n=14 (c,
d); control+SCD inhibition-T n=13 (c) n=14
(d); shFADS2-2+vehicle-L n=19 (c,
d); shFADS2-2+vehicle-T n=18 (c,
d); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-L n=15 (c) n=16
(d); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-T n=15 (c,
d); two experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s
multiple comparisons.(e,f) Desaturation activity from linoleate
to γ-linolenate based on the γ-linolenate to linoleate ratio
and arachidonate abundance in HUH7 and A549 control (non-targeting shRNA)
and FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2) cells (n=3). One-way ANOVA
with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.(g,h) Linoleate and arachidonate abundance
in normal adjacent murine liver and tumor nodules from HUH7 control
(non-targeting shRNA) or FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2)
orthotopic xenografts treated with vehicle or Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (1.5 mg
per kg twice daily per oral; p.o.). Control+vehicle-L n=12 (g)
n=14 (h); control+vehicle-T n=13 (g) n=14
(h); control+SCD inhibition-L n=14 (g) n=15
(h); control+SCD inhibition-T n=14 (g) n=16
(h); shFADS2-2+vehicle-L n=14 (g) n=16
(h); shFADS2-2+vehicle-T n=13 (g) n=15
(h); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-L n=15 (g) n=18
(h); shFADS2-2+SCD inhibition-T n=15 (g) n=16
(h); two experiments. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s
multiple comparisons.Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1% : HUH7;
0.5% : others) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent SD (in
vitro) or SEM (in vivo) from mean of biolocial
independent samples (in vitro) or animals (in
vivo).
Carbons from sapienate are detected in octadecenoate
(a-f) 13C enrichment of palmitate or
stearate from 13C6 glucose in HUH7 or A549 cells in
control condition (ethanol, black) or upon 12C sapienate
supplementation (blue). Cells were grown in 10% dialyzed FBS DMEM containing
4.5 g per L 13C6 glucose for 1 week, after which cells
were grown for 72 h in 0.5% FBS DMEM containing 4.5 g per L
13C6 glucose supplemented with ethanol or 20
µM 12C sapienate.The purpose of this experiment was to trace the incorporation of
carbons from sapienate into cis-8-octadecenoate. Palmitate and stearate were
measured as controls. Since 13C-labeled sapienate is not
commercially available, we performed a reverse labeling in which we
pre-labeled HUH7 and A549 cells with 13C6-glucose to
enrich cis-8-octadecenoate with 13C. Then, we supplemented these
cells with unlabeled sapienate in the presence of
13C6-glucose and determined the 13C
enrichment of octadecenoate. If sapienate is elongated to
cis-8-octadecenoate, we expect a shift in the 13C enrichment from
higher to lower octadecenoate isotopologues. Indeed, we found that
supplementation of unlabeled sapienate shifted the 13C enrichment
accordingly (a, d). Moreover, the largest 13C
enrichment increase was found in the M+2 isotopologue, indicating the
elongation of unlabeled sapienate to octadecenoate with 13C
labeled acetyl-CoA. As expected, sapienate supplementation did not or only
marginally change the 13C enrichment of palmitate and stearate
(b,c,e,f).Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests; n=3. Error bars
represent mean ± SD from biological independent samples.
Sapienate is elongated to cis-8-octadecenoate
(a) Relative cis-8-octadecenoate abundances in cancer
cells normalized to T47D cells. HUH7 n=3; A549 n=3, H460 n=5, DU145 n=3,
MDA-MB-468 n=5, T47D n=5. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons.(b,c) Relative cis-8-octadecenoate
abundances in HUH7 and A549 control (non-targeting shRNA) and
FADS2 knockdown (shFADS2) cells in control condition
(ethanol) or upon 20 µM sapienate supplementation normalized to
control. HUH7: control n=6 (ethanol) n=3 (sapienate); shFADS2-1 n=3;
shFADS2-2 n=6 (ethanol) n=3 (sapienate); A549: control n=6; shFADS2-1 n=3;
shFADS2-2 n=3. Data values are shown in Supplementary Table 1c,
d. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple
comparisons.(d) Relative proliferation of MDA-MB-468 cells with
ethanol (n=9) or 20 µM cis-8-octadecenoate (n=3) upon treatment with
DMSO or 0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j. Data were normalized to control with
error bars representing SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple
comparisons.(e,f) Relative proliferation of HUH7 and
A549 control (non-targeting shRNA) and knockdown (shFADS2) cells with
ethanol or 20 µM cis-8-octadecenoate upon treatment with DMSO or 2 nM
Merck Frosst Cpd 3j. HUH7: control n=9; shFADS2-1 n=6; shFADS2-2 n=9; A549:
EtOH n=6; cis-8-C18:1 n=3. Data were normalized to control. Two-way ANOVA
with Tukey multiple comparisons. Only statistics for pair-wise comparisons
are depicted.Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: all other cancer cells) with treatment of 72 h. Error bars represent
mean ± SD from biological independent samples, unless otherwise
noted.
Sapienate and cis-8-octadecenoate are used in membranes
(a-d) Heat map representing abundance changes of
phosphatidylcholine (a), phosphatidylethanolamine
(b), phosphatidylserine (c) and
phosphatidylinositol (d) species in control and
FADS2 knockdown HUH7 and A549 cells relative to
control. HUH7: control n=3; shFADS2-1 n=4; shFADS2-2 n=5; A549: n=5. Only
significant differences are depicted as log2 fold change compared
to control. X denotes blank or excluded values. Phospholipid species
carrying sapienate or palmitoleate are depicted in bold red and listed in
Supplementary Table
1e. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons.(e) Relative distribution of phospholipid species in
HUH7 (n=2) and A549 (n=5) cell with non-targeting shRNA (control). PC:
phosphatidylcholine; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PS: phosphatidylserine;
PI: phosphatidylinositol; SM: sphingomyelin.(f) Membrane fluidity based on the ordered to
disordered ratio in HUH7 and A549 with a non-targeting shRNA (control;
black) or two different shRNA targeting FADS2 (brown and orange) normalized
to control (n=4). The higher the ordered to disordered ratio, the more
saturated lipids are present in the membrane. One-way ANOVA with
Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.(g) Lipid peroxidation sensitivity via MDA assay in
HUH7 with a non-targeting shRNA (control; black) or two different shRNA
targeting FADS2 (brown and orange) normalized to control (n=3). Cells were
treated with vehicle or 5 µM RSL3, the latter inhibiting glutathione
peroxidase 4 and inducing lipid peroxidation. Two-way ANOVA with
Sidak’s multiple comparisons.Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS DMEM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: all other cancer cells) with treatment of 72 h. Data are presented as
mean ± SD from biological independent samples.
SCD independence and sapienate metabolism occur in medium with glucose
and amino acid concentrations that are similar to physiological
conditions
(a) Fatty acid concentrations of FBS (fetal bovine
serum; n=4). Low FBS condition (0.5-1% FBS) corresponds to a total fatty
acid concentration of 4.31-8.62 µM.(b) Sensitivity profile of cancer cells to Merck Frosst
Cpd 3j (white; HUH7, A549: 2 nM; H460, DU145: 1 nM; MDA-MB-468, T47D: 0.5
nM) in blood-like medium (BLM)12,13 normalized to
control. HUH7 n=3; A549 n=3; H460 n=6; DU145 n=6, MDA-MB-468 n=3; T47D n=9.
Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons.(c, d) Sensitivity profile of HUH7 and
A549 control (non-targeting shRNA; black) and knockdown (shFADS2; brown and
orange) cells treated with DMSO (dark bars) or 2 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j
(light bars) in blood-like medium (BLM)12,13 normalized to
control (n=3). Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons.(e) Sensitivity profile of MDA-MB-468 control (black)
and FADS2 overexpression (green) cells DMSO (dark bars) or
0.5 nM Merck Frosst Cpd 3j (light bars) in blood-like medium (BLM)12,13 normalized to control (n=3). Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak
multiple comparisons.(f) Desaturation activity to sapienate based on the
sapienate to palmitate ratio in cancer cells in conditions as described in
(b). n=3. Unpaired two-sided Student’s T-tests with Holm-Sidak
multiple comparisons.(g,h) Desaturation activity from palmitate to sapienate
based on the sapienate to palmitate ratio in the same conditions as
described in (c-f). n=3. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons (g); unpaired Student’s T-test (h).Cancer cell experiments were performed in low FBS BLM (1%: HUH7;
0.5%: all other cancer cells) with treatment of 72 h. Data are presented as
mean ± SD from biological independent samples.
Separation and detection of sapienate and cis-8-octadecenoate
(a) Separation and detection of sapienate
(cis-6-hexadecenoate) and palmitoleate (cis-9-hexadecenoate) via gas
chromatography mass spectrometry. Separation was optimized using a standard
mix containing pentadecanoate, sapienate, palmitoleate, palmitate,
cis-8-octadecenoate, oleate, vaccinate, linoleate and stearate (upper
panel), and the method was subsequently validated by measurement of these
fatty acids in biological samples. A representative biological sample is
presented in the lower panel.(b) Separation and detection of cis-8-octadecenoate,
oleate (cis-9-octadecenoate) and vaccinate (cis-11-octadecenoate) via gas
chromatography flame ionization detector. Separation was optimized using a
standard mix containing cis-8-, cis-9- and cis-11-octadecenoate (upper
panel), and the method was subsequently validated by measurement of these
fatty acids in biological samples. A representative biological sample is
presented in the lower panel.
Authors: Evelien Rysman; Koen Brusselmans; Katryn Scheys; Leen Timmermans; Rita Derua; Sebastian Munck; Paul P Van Veldhoven; David Waltregny; Veerle W Daniëls; Jelle Machiels; Frank Vanderhoydonc; Karine Smans; Etienne Waelkens; Guido Verhoeven; Johannes V Swinnen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kim Ekroos; Christer S Ejsing; Ute Bahr; Michael Karas; Kai Simons; Andrej Shevchenko Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2003-08-16 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Lisa M Butler; Ylenia Perone; Jonas Dehairs; Leslie E Lupien; Vincent de Laat; Ali Talebi; Massimo Loda; William B Kinlaw; Johannes V Swinnen Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Arnaud Blomme; Catriona A Ford; Ernest Mui; Rachana Patel; Chara Ntala; Lauren E Jamieson; Mélanie Planque; Grace H McGregor; Paul Peixoto; Eric Hervouet; Colin Nixon; Mark Salji; Luke Gaughan; Elke Markert; Peter Repiscak; David Sumpton; Giovanny Rodriguez Blanco; Sergio Lilla; Jurre J Kamphorst; Duncan Graham; Karen Faulds; Gillian M MacKay; Sarah-Maria Fendt; Sara Zanivan; Hing Y Leung Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Yurena Vivas-García; Paola Falletta; Jana Liebing; Pakavarin Louphrasitthiphol; Yongmei Feng; Jagat Chauhan; David A Scott; Nicole Glodde; Ana Chocarro-Calvo; Sarah Bonham; Andrei L Osterman; Roman Fischer; Ze'ev Ronai; Custodia García-Jiménez; Michael Hölzel; Colin R Goding Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 17.970