Literature DB >> 30728341

Morphometric Measurements of the Hip Bone in Turkish Adult Population.

Mehmet Demir1, Emre Atay2, Bülent Güneri3, Halil Yilmaz4, Muhammed Furkan Arpaci5, Hatice Susar Güler6, Özge Al7, Tolga Ertekin2, Mehtap Nisari7, Erdoğan Unur7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Coxal bone paticipates in the formation of the pelvic skeleton. Anatomy knowledge on coxafemoral joint as well as careful history taking and physical examination are crucial in evaluation and management of disorders involving hip joint. The aims of the present study were to perform morphometric measurements of the human coxal bones, calculation of their articular surface areas and report the range of these parameters regarding Turkish adult population.
METHODS: Seventy-two dry human adult coxal bones (39 left and 33 right) from the Anatomy Departments of Erciyes University, Inonu University and Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University were measured using a caliper sensitive to 0.1 mm. Morphometric measurements were performed through 22 parameters determined. While 19 of these parameters were related to the distance between two points and thicknesses in various parts of the bone, the remaining three were related to the determination of articular surface areas. The articular surface areas of hip bone (facies auricularis (FA), facies lunata (FL) and facies symphsialis (FS)) were calculated with ImageJ software program.
RESULTS: The average values of facies auricularis area were 1659.04 ± 470.92 mm² and 1637.32 ± 460.15 mm² on the left and right coxal bones, respectively. No statistically significant difference was determined between the left and right coxal bone measurements (p > 0.05). We found a positive and significant correlation between articular surface areas of facies auricularis (FA), facies lunata (FL) and facies symphysialis (FS) and maximum width of ilium (rFA = 0.299, rFL = 0.276, rFS = 0.375, respectively and p < 0.05), and distance between spina ilica anterior superior and the upper edge of facies symphysialis (rFA = 0.268, rFL = 0.511, rFS = 0.482, respectively and p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The distribution and mean values of coxal bone morphometric measurements usually differ between individuals and human populations. With this regard, orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the diversity in components of coxal bone dimensions although implants and hip prosthesis components of different sizes are manufactured. Safe routes and estimated distances should be considered during surgical procedures to avoid complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coxal bone; Anatomy; Articular surface area; Morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30728341      PMCID: PMC6347039     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kobe J Med Sci        ISSN: 0023-2513


  21 in total

1.  Morphometry of the supra sciatic notch intrailiac implant anchor passage.

Authors:  J L Berry; T Stahurski; M A Asher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  [A morphologic evaluation of the sacroiliac joint and plate fixation on a pelvic model using a S1 pedicular screw, transiliosacral screws, and a compression rod for sacroiliac joint injuries].

Authors:  Irfan Esenkaya
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  Arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  R A DENHAM; W A LAW
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1957-11

4.  Morphological characteristics of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Antun Salamon; Tomislav Salamon; Davorin Sef; Ana Jo-Osvatić
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2004

5.  Morphologic features of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Figen Govsa; M Asim Ozer; Zuhal Ozgur
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Antropological measurement of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Nikola Krmek; Ana Jo-Osvatić; Tatjana Nikolić; Vlado Krmek; Anton Salamon
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2006-12

7.  The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip.

Authors:  Masamitsu Ezoe; Masatoshi Naito; Toshio Inoue
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning.

Authors:  M Maruyama; J R Feinberg; W N Capello; J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The pylon concept of pelvic anchorage for spinal instrumentation in the human cadaver.

Authors:  Richard M Schwend; Romuald Sluyters; Jan Najdzionek
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Is there a role for percutaneous pelvic and acetabular reconstruction?

Authors:  P M Rommens
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  1 in total

1.  Iliac anatomy in women with developmental dysplasia of the hip: Measurements using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Noriaki Sako; Nobuhiro Kaku; Yuta Kubota; Yoshiki Kitahara; Hiroaki Tagomori; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.