| Literature DB >> 30728277 |
Chelsea K Osterman1, Dilip S Babu2, Daniel M Geynisman3, Bianca Lewis3, Robert A Somer4, Arjun V Balar5, Matthew R Zibelman3, Elizabeth A Guancial6, Gianna Antinori4, Shun Yu7, Vivek Narayan7, Thomas J Guzzo8, Elizabeth R Plimack3, David J Vaughn8, Chunkit Fung2, Ronac Mamtani9.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC; 70 mg/m2) is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). Many patients (pts) cannot receive cisplatin because of renal impairment, and administration of cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 1 + 8 or 1 + 2 (i.e., split schedule) is a commonly used alternative. In this retrospective analysis, we compared complete (pT0) and partial (<pT2) pathologic response rates between split schedule (SS) and conventional schedule (CS) pts, after 1:1 matching on chemotherapy regimen, number of cycles, tumor histology, and clinical stage. Eighty matched pts were identified. pT0 rates were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-33%) and 32.5% (95% CI, 19%-49%) in SS and CS cisplatin pts, respectively (p = .21), corresponding to an odds ratio for pT0 of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.16-1.31) with SS cisplatin. Split schedule cisplatin was associated with numerically but not statistically significant lower pathologic response rates relative to full dose. © AlphaMed Press 2019.Entities:
Keywords: Cisplatin; Muscle‐invasive bladder cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Nephrotoxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30728277 PMCID: PMC6516116 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncologist ISSN: 1083-7159