Literature DB >> 29576445

Feasibility of Cisplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients With Diminished Renal Function.

Vadim S Koshkin1, Pedro C Barata1, Lisa A Rybicki2, Haris Zahoor1, Nima Almassi3, Alicia M Redden1, Amr F Fergany3, Jihad Kaouk3, Georges-Pascal Haber3, Andrew J Stephenson3, Moshe C Ornstein1, Timothy Gilligan1, Jorge A Garcia1, Brian I Rini1, Petros Grivas4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy is the standard of care in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. There are limited data regarding chemotherapy tolerability and outcomes for patients with low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) who receive cisplatin-based NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who received cisplatin-based NAC at Cleveland Clinic (2005-2016) was undertaken. Patients with pre-NAC GFR < 60 mL/min by either Cockcroft-Gault (CG) or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula were compared to patients with GFR ≥ 60 mL/min for NAC tolerability, pathologic complete and partial response (pPR), and the ability to undergo radical cystectomy.
RESULTS: Thirty patients with low GFR (34-59 mL/min) and 94 patients with normal GFR (≥ 60 mL/min) were identified. Low GFR patients were older (median, 71 vs. 65 years), but other demographic and transurethral resection of bladder tumor characteristics were comparable. Low GFR patients more frequently had early NAC discontinuation (30% vs. 13%), NAC modifications (delays, dose reduction, or discontinuation, 66% vs. 40%), and cisplatin-based NAC administered in split doses (37% vs. 16%). No differences in NAC tolerability or outcomes were noted among low GFR patients receiving split-dose versus standard regimens. No differences were noted between low and normal GFR patients in NAC cycles (median, 3 for each), cystectomy rates (93% for each), time to cystectomy, and GFR change from baseline to after NAC. Pathologic complete response was higher among normal GFR patients (24% vs. 14%).
CONCLUSION: Patients with low GFR had more NAC discontinuations and modifications, but most completed planned NAC cycles. For carefully selected patients with GFR < 60 mL/min, cisplatin-based NAC remains a treatment option.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glomerular filtration rate; Renal insufficiency; Split-dose cisplatin; Urinary bladder neoplasm; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29576445     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  8 in total

Review 1.  Treatment Approaches for Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  David J Einstein; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

2.  The Quest for an Ideal Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Muscle-Invasive Localized Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Umang Swami; Petros Grivas; Neeraj Agarwal
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 3.  Defining cisplatin eligibility in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Di Maria Jiang; Shilpa Gupta; Abhijat Kitchlu; Alejandro Meraz-Munoz; Scott A North; Nimira S Alimohamed; Normand Blais; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Efficacy of Split Schedule Versus Conventional Schedule Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Chelsea K Osterman; Dilip S Babu; Daniel M Geynisman; Bianca Lewis; Robert A Somer; Arjun V Balar; Matthew R Zibelman; Elizabeth A Guancial; Gianna Antinori; Shun Yu; Vivek Narayan; Thomas J Guzzo; Elizabeth R Plimack; David J Vaughn; Chunkit Fung; Ronac Mamtani
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-02-06

Review 5.  Refining neoadjuvant therapy clinical trial design for muscle-invasive bladder cancer before cystectomy: a joint US Food and Drug Administration and Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network workshop.

Authors:  Chana Weinstock; Matthew D Galsky; Elaine Chang; Andrea B Apolo; Rick Bangs; Stephanie Chisolm; Vinay Duddalwar; Jason A Efstathiou; Kirsten B Goldberg; Donna E Hansel; Ashish M Kamat; Paul G Kluetz; Seth P Lerner; Elizabeth Plimack; Tatiana Prowell; Harpreet Singh; Daniel Suzman; Evan Y Yu; Hui Zhang; Julia A Beaver; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition vs. cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ali Raza Khaki; Yong Shan; Richard E Nelson; Sapna Kaul; John L Gore; Petros Grivas; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.954

7.  The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Kai Ozaki; Shingo Hatakeyama; Toshikazu Tanaka; Daisuke Noro; Noriko Tokui; Hirotaka Horiguchi; Yoshiharu Okuyama; Naoki Fujita; Teppei Okamoto; Akiko Okamoto; Yuichiro Suzuki; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 8.  Clinical evidence and insights supporting the use of avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Masatoshi Eto; Jae-Lyun Lee; Yen-Hwa Chang; Seasea Gao; Manmohan Singh; Howard Gurney
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 1.926

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.