Literature DB >> 30725441

[A retrospective study about the influence of an emergency information form on the place of death of palliative care patients].

Günter Polt1, Dietmar Weixler2, Norbert Bauer3.   

Abstract

In palliative medicine planning in advance is important for critical care situations. It is highly significant to make useful and by the patient and his relatives desired decisions. These concern transport in a situation of crisis and the venue of death (either death at home or transfer to a hospital).In this study the effect of a new Emergency Information Form about the place of death was examined. The used Emergency Information Form enabled the patient to express a wish on transfer in the case of crisis in advance and communicate this wish to the Emergency system.A total of 858 patients, taken care of by the mobile palliative-team Hartberg/Weiz/Vorau in the period from 2010 to 2015, were included in the study. The Intervention group-the patients for whom an Emergency Information Form was established-counted 38 patients. Data analysis was retrospective, pseudo anonymized and external.The 4 most important results were:1) The Emergency Information Form increased the probability for the intervention group to die at home (intervention group: 72.2%, controll group 1: 53.0%, controll group 2: 56.6%).2) Important in this change was, that the opinion of the patients was considered. The decision made in the Emergency Information Form correlated with a high significance (p = 0.01) with the actual place of death.3) Furthermore, it came clear that the Emergency Information Form was a useful tool to handle the utilization of special facilities. Within the intervention group young patients (with a lot of symptoms) died in a special facility more often than old patients. These, rather geriatric people, were mostly brought to a general hospital.4) There was no significant relation between the duration of care and the probability that an Emergency Information Form was established (p = 0.63). However, there was a high significance between the number of home visits and the probability that an Emergency Information Form was written (p = 0.02).Due to the fact that there was a small intervention group restricted to only one palliative team further studies could help to make clear advises for palliative teams regarding scope, duration and frequency of home-visits. Thus the term "care continuity" could be concretized in the guidelines.The study brought forward that numerous (and short) contacts with the patient were more convenient than less but long home-visits in order to fulfil the patients wish concerning his place of death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance care planning; Continuity of care; Emergency information form; Palliative Care; Place of death

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30725441     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-019-0681-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program.

Authors:  Susan E Hickman; Christine A Nelson; Nancy A Perrin; Alvin H Moss; Bernard J Hammes; Susan W Tolle
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark.

Authors:  Mette Asbjoern Neergaard; Anders Bonde Jensen; Jens Sondergaard; Ineta Sokolowski; Frede Olesen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2011-03-01

3.  Which hospice patients with cancer are able to die in the setting of their choice? Results of a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Neha Jeurkar; Sue Farrington; Teresa R Craig; Julie Slattery; Joan K Harrold; Betty Oldanie; Joan M Teno; David J Casarett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The association between in-patient death, utilization of hospital resources and availability of palliative home care for cancer patients.

Authors:  Alberto Alonso-Babarro; Jenaro Astray-Mochales; Felicitas Domínguez-Berjón; Ricard Gènova-Maleras; Eduardo Bruera; Antonio Díaz-Mayordomo; Carlos Centeno Cortes
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 5.  Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non-malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew James Billingham; Sarah-Jane Billingham
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.568

6.  Place of death: hospital-based advanced home care versus conventional care. A prospective study in palliative cancer care.

Authors:  Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist; Marit S Jordhøy; Magnus Jannert; Peter Fayers; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Natalia Calanzani; Marjolein Gysels; Sue Hall; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  International recommendations for outpatient palliative care and prehospital palliative emergencies - a prospective questionnaire-based investigation.

Authors:  Christoph Hr Wiese; Christoph L Lassen; Utz E Bartels; Mahmoud Taghavi; Saleem Elhabash; Bernhard M Graf; Gerd G Hanekop
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Determinants of place of death: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jyothi Jayaraman; Ks Joseph
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Place of death in haematological malignancy: variations by disease sub-type and time from diagnosis to death.

Authors:  Debra A Howell; Han-I Wang; Alexandra G Smith; Martin R Howard; Russell D Patmore; Eve Roman
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.