Literature DB >> 21362004

Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark.

Mette Asbjoern Neergaard1, Anders Bonde Jensen, Jens Sondergaard, Ineta Sokolowski, Frede Olesen, Peter Vedsted.   

Abstract

Achieving home death is often seen as an important endpoint in palliative care, but no studies of the preferred place-of-death have yet been conducted in Scandinavia. Furthermore, we do not know if professionals' report on deceased patients' preference of place-of-death is a valid information. The aim of this study was to describe where terminally ill Danish cancer patients prefer to die and to determine if their preference changed during the palliative period, as reported retrospectively by bereaved relatives, general practitioners (GPs) and community nurses (CNs) and to assess the agreement of their accounts. The study was a population-based, cross-sectional combined register and questionnaire study in Aarhus County, Denmark. The population comprised 599 deceased adult cancer patients who had died from 1 March to 30 November 2006 and were identified through merging of health registers. Relatives returned 198 questionnaires about patients' preferred place-of-death, GPs 333 and CNs 201. The study showed that most terminally ill cancer patients preferred home death (up to 80.7%). The reported preference for home death weakened as death approached (down to 64.4%). A better congruence was seen between relatives' and GPs' accounts of preference for place of death at the end of the palliative period (κ 0.71) than between relatives' and CNs' accounts (κ 0.37). In conclusion, bereaved relatives (and GPs and CNs) report retrospectively that most terminally ill cancer patients wish to die at home. The preference weakened significantly as death approached. The agreement between relatives' and GPs' accounts on patients' preferences at the end of the palliative period was 'substantial', whereas the agreement between relatives' and CNs' accounts at the same time was significantly less outspoken. This indicates that CNs may be facing a problem in assessing their patients' wishes retrospectively.
© 2011 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences © 2011 Nordic College of Caring Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21362004     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00870.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  9 in total

1.  [A retrospective study about the influence of an emergency information form on the place of death of palliative care patients].

Authors:  Günter Polt; Dietmar Weixler; Norbert Bauer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2019-02-06

2.  The quality of end-of-life care for Danish cancer patients who have received non-specialized palliative care: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF.

Authors:  Lone Ross; Mette Asbjoern Neergaard; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Preference of the place of death among people of pune.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Kulkarni; Pradeep Kulkarni; Vrushali Anavkar; Ravindra Ghooi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2014-05

4.  Danish general practitioners' self-reported competences in end-of-life care.

Authors:  Anna Winthereik; Mette Neergaard; Peter Vedsted; Anders Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Development, modelling, and pilot testing of a complex intervention to support end-of-life care provided by Danish general practitioners.

Authors:  Anna Kirstine Winthereik; Mette Asbjoern Neergaard; Anders Bonde Jensen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Hospitalisation at the end of life among cancer and non-cancer patients in Denmark: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Høy Seemann Vestergaard; Mette Asbjoern Neergaard; Christian Fynbo Christiansen; Henrik Nielsen; Thomas Lyngaa; Kristina Grønborg Laut; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Changing patterns in place of cancer death in England: a population-based study.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Yuen K Ho; Julia Verne; Myer Glickman; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Are Cancer Patients' Socioeconomic and Cultural Factors Associated with Contact to General Practitioners in the Last Phase of Life?

Authors:  M A Neergaard; F Olesen; J Sondergaard; P Vedsted; A B Jensen
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2015-08-27

9.  The DOMUS study protocol: a randomized clinical trial of accelerated transition from oncological treatment to specialized palliative care at home.

Authors:  Mie Nordly; Kirstine Skov Benthien; Hans Von Der Maase; Christoffer Johansen; Marie Kruse; Helle Timm; Eva Soelberg Vadstrup; Geana Paula Kurita; Annika Berglind von Heymann-Horan; Per Sjøgren
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.234

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.