Phillip S Ge1, Pichamol Jirapinyo1, Tomohiko R Ohya2, Naoto Tamai2, Kazuki Sumiyama2, Christopher C Thompson1, Hiroyuki Aihara3. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 2. Department of Endoscopy, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. haihara@bwh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms; however, US experience has been limited. We aimed to evaluate our clinical outcomes in colorectal ESD. DESIGN: This prospective study included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal ESD at a major US center. Demographics, lesion and technical characteristics, outcomes, adverse events, and pathological diagnoses were recorded. Factors affecting resection outcomes and procedure time were evaluated. RESULTS: 77 patients who underwent colorectal ESD were analyzed. Mean colorectal lesion diameter was 49.4 mm. Mean procedure time was 104.7 min, and 97.4% of patients were discharged home on the same day. En bloc, complete, and curative resection was achieved in 97.4%, 97.4%, and 93.5% of colorectal ESD cases. Microperforation and delayed bleeding rates were 1.3% and 3.9%. On univariable analysis, the presence of tattoo adversely affected en bloc resection (p = 0.002), complete resection (p = 0.002), and curative resection (p = 0.008). Prior EMR attempts adversely affected en bloc resection (p = 0.028), complete resection (p = 0.028), and procedure time (p = 0.008). On multivariable analysis, the presence of tattoo predicted failure to achieve curative resection (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02-0.98; p = 0.048). Lesion size > 50 mm (OR 3.89; 95% CI 1.13-13.41; p = 0.031), presence of tattoo (OR 9.38; 95% CI 1.05-83.83; p = 0.045), and prior EMR attempts (OR 7.13; 95% CI 1.76-28.90; p = 0.006) predicted procedure time ≥ 90 min. A scoring system was created to predict prolonged ESD procedure time and was externally validated, with AUC 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.83). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effects of multiple risk factors on resection outcomes and procedure time in colorectal ESD. Tattoo placement and attempted EMR should be avoided for lesions being considered for ESD.
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms; however, US experience has been limited. We aimed to evaluate our clinical outcomes in colorectal ESD. DESIGN: This prospective study included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal ESD at a major US center. Demographics, lesion and technical characteristics, outcomes, adverse events, and pathological diagnoses were recorded. Factors affecting resection outcomes and procedure time were evaluated. RESULTS: 77 patients who underwent colorectal ESD were analyzed. Mean colorectal lesion diameter was 49.4 mm. Mean procedure time was 104.7 min, and 97.4% of patients were discharged home on the same day. En bloc, complete, and curative resection was achieved in 97.4%, 97.4%, and 93.5% of colorectal ESD cases. Microperforation and delayed bleeding rates were 1.3% and 3.9%. On univariable analysis, the presence of tattoo adversely affected en bloc resection (p = 0.002), complete resection (p = 0.002), and curative resection (p = 0.008). Prior EMR attempts adversely affected en bloc resection (p = 0.028), complete resection (p = 0.028), and procedure time (p = 0.008). On multivariable analysis, the presence of tattoo predicted failure to achieve curative resection (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02-0.98; p = 0.048). Lesion size > 50 mm (OR 3.89; 95% CI 1.13-13.41; p = 0.031), presence of tattoo (OR 9.38; 95% CI 1.05-83.83; p = 0.045), and prior EMR attempts (OR 7.13; 95% CI 1.76-28.90; p = 0.006) predicted procedure time ≥ 90 min. A scoring system was created to predict prolonged ESD procedure time and was externally validated, with AUC 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.83). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effects of multiple risk factors on resection outcomes and procedure time in colorectal ESD. Tattoo placement and attempted EMR should be avoided for lesions being considered for ESD.
Authors: Shin ei Kudo; René Lambert; John I Allen; Hiroaki Fujii; Takahiro Fujii; Hiroshi Kashida; Takahisa Matsuda; Masaki Mori; Hiroshi Saito; Tadakazu Shimoda; Shinji Tanaka; Hidenobu Watanabe; Joseph J Sung; Andrew D Feld; John M Inadomi; Michael J O'Brien; David A Lieberman; David F Ransohoff; Roy M Soetikno; George Triadafilopoulos; Ann Zauber; Claudio Rolim Teixeira; Jean François Rey; Edgar Jaramillo; Carlos A Rubio; Andre Van Gossum; Michael Jung; Michael Vieth; Jeremy R Jass; Paul D Hurlstone Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: John T Maple; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Shailendra S Chauhan; Joo Ha Hwang; Sri Komanduri; Michael Manfredi; Vani Konda; Faris M Murad; Uzma D Siddiqui; Subhas Banerjee Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: H Isomoto; H Nishiyama; N Yamaguchi; E Fukuda; H Ishii; K Ikeda; K Ohnita; K Nakao; S Kohno; S Shikuwa Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 10.093