Literature DB >> 19670135

Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.

H Isomoto1, H Nishiyama, N Yamaguchi, E Fukuda, H Ishii, K Ikeda, K Ohnita, K Nakao, S Kohno, S Shikuwa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) permits removal of colorectal epithelial neoplasms en bloc, but a substantial risk of procedure-related perforation has been reported. We sought to unravel the clinicopathological factors associated with the clinical outcomes of ESD for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in a large series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ESD was done in 278 patients with 292 colorectal tumors that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The criteria for ESD were: lesion greater than 20 mm in size, lesion with fibrotic scarring, locally residual colorectal lesion, or invasive carcinoma with slight submucosal penetration. Resection was assessed as en bloc or piecemeal, complete (en bloc with tumor-free lateral and basal margins) or incomplete. Complications including perforation and bleeding were assessed, and factors related to each were analyzed using logistic regression. Patients underwent multiple follow-up endoscopic examinations (mean 4.6; median 4; range 2 - 9; total number 1010).
RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved in 90.1 % of lesions (263/292) and resection was deemed to be complete in 233 (79.8 %). Right-side colonic location and the finding of fibrosis were the significant contributors to incomplete resection. Perforation was seen in 24 cases (8.2 %), and was associated with large tumor size and the presence of fibrosis. When the contributive factors for each were combined, the risks of incomplete resection and perforation were substantially increased.
CONCLUSION: The present study provides useful information for predicting risks for incomplete resection and complication in colorectal ESD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19670135     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  64 in total

Review 1.  Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nobuaki Yagi; Yuji Naito; Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors--1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute's experiences.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Lee; Jae Bum Lee; Suk Hee Lee; Do Sun Kim; Doo Han Lee; Doo Seok Lee; Eui Gon Youk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kanefumi Yamashita; Hironari Shiwaku; Toshihiro Ohmiya; Hideki Shimaoka; Hiroki Okada; Ryo Nakashima; Richiko Beppu; Daisuke Kato; Takamitsu Sasaki; Seiichiro Hoshino; Satoshi Nimura; Ken Yamaura; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07-10

5.  Importance of histological evaluation in endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Nobuaki Yagi; Akio Yanagisawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-04-15

Review 6.  Tips for safety in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Takaaki Murakami; Ryohei Hirose; Kiyoshi Ogiso; Yutaka Inada; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Mitsuo Kishimoto; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

7.  Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Mitsuru Kato; Kenji Tominaga; Takeshi Suzuki; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Frequent occurrence of fever in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor, but bacteremia is not a significant cause.

Authors:  Kentaro Izumi; Taro Osada; Naoto Sakamoto; Tomohiro Kodani; Yoshie Higashihara; Hideaki Ritsuno; Tomoyoshi Shibuya; Akihito Nagahara; Tatsuo Ogihara; Ken Kikuchi; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Factors Associated with Fibrosis during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Does Pretreatment Biopsy Potentially Elicit Submucosal Fibrosis and Affect Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes?

Authors:  Masatake Kuroha; Hisashi Shiga; Yoshitake Kanazawa; Hiroshi Nagai; Tomoyuki Handa; Ryo Ichikawa; Motoyuki Onodera; Takeo Naito; Rintaro Moroi; Tomoya Kimura; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Tooru Shimosegawa; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Risk factors for vertical incomplete resection in endoscopic submucosal dissection as total excisional biopsy for submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shun-ichiro Ozawa; Shinji Tanaka; Nana Hayashi; Soki Nishiyama; Motomi Terasaki; Koichi Nakadoi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Shiro Oka; Shigeto Yoshida; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.