Literature DB >> 30723994

A novel octaray multielectrode catheter for high-resolution atrial mapping: Electrogram characterization and utility for mapping ablation gaps.

Jakub Sroubek1, Markus Rottmann1, Michael Barkagan1, Eran Leshem1, Ayelet Shapira-Daniels1, Erez Brem2, Cesar Fuentes-Ortega2, Jamie Malinaric3, Shubhayu Basu2, Meir Bar-Tal3, Elad Anter1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multielectrode mapping catheters improve the ability to map within the heterogeneous scar. A novel Octaray catheter with eight spines and 48 electrodes may further improve the speed and resolution of atrial mapping. The aims of this study were to (1) establish the Octaray's baseline mapping performance and electrogram (EGM) characteristics in healthy atria and to (2) determine its utility for identifying gaps in a swine model of atrial ablation lines. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The right atria of eight healthy swine were mapped with Octaray and Pentaray catheters (Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA) before and after the creation of ablation lines with intentional gaps. Baseline mapping characteristics including EGM amplitude, duration, number of EGMs, and mapping time were compared. Postablation maps were created and EGM characteristics of continuous lines and gaps were correlated with pathology. Compared with Pentaray, the Octaray collected more EGMs per map (2178 ± 637 vs 1046 ± 238; P < 0.001) at a shorter mapping duration (3.2 ± 0.79 vs 6.9 ± 2.67 minutes; P < 0.001). In healthy atria, the Octaray recorded lower bipolar voltage amplitude (1.96 ± 1.83 mV vs 2.41 ± 1.92 mV; P < 0.001) while ablation gaps were characterized by higher voltage amplitude (1.24 ± 1.12 mV vs 1.04 ± 1.27 mV; P < 0.001). Ablation gaps were similarly identified by both catheters (P = 1.0). The frequency of "false gaps," defined as intact ablation lines with increased voltage amplitude was more common with Pentaray (6 vs 2) and resulted from erroneous annotation of far-field EGMs.
CONCLUSION: The Octaray increases the mapping speed and density compared with the Pentaray catheter. It is as sensitive for identifying ablation gaps and more specific for mapping intact ablation lines.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation; atrial arrhythmia; multipolar catheter

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30723994     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

1.  An early multicenter experience of the novel high-density star-shaped mapping catheter in complex arrhythmias.

Authors:  Andrea Sarkozy; Johan Vijgen; Tom De Potter; Richard Schilling; Vias Markides
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [New mapping tools for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  Maryuri Delgado-López; Christian-Hendrik Heeger; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-10-14

Review 3.  Procedural Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of Catheter Ablation of Atypical Atrial Flutters in a Wide Spectrum of Heart Diseases: An Updated Clinical Overview.

Authors:  Roberto De Ponti; Raffaella Marazzi; Manola Vilotta; Fabio Angeli; Jacopo Marazzato
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Atrial fibrillation driver identification through regional mutual information networks: a modeling perspective.

Authors:  Qun Sha; Luizetta Elliott; Xiangming Zhang; Tzachi Levy; Tushar Sharma; Ahmed Abdelaal
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Spatial-Temporal Signals and Clinical Indices in Electrocardiographic Imaging (II): Electrogram Clustering and T-wave Alternans.

Authors:  Raúl Caulier-Cisterna; Manuel Blanco-Velasco; Rebeca Goya-Esteban; Sergio Muñoz-Romero; Margarita Sanromán-Junquera; Arcadi García-Alberola; José Luis Rojo-Álvarez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.