| Literature DB >> 30723511 |
M Rondanelli1,2, A M Castellazzi3, A Riva4, P Allegrini4, M A Faliva5, G Peroni5, M Naso5, M Nichetti5, C Tagliacarne3, C Valsecchi3, T Fazia6, S Perna7, F Graziano6, M Grassi6, L Bernardinelli6.
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of 60-day artichoke leaf extract (ALE) supplementation (250mg, twice daily) on cytokines levels, natural killer cell (NK) response, and lipo-metabolic profile (HDL, LDL, and total-cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), ApoB, ApoA, lipid accumulation product (LAP), glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) in twenty adults (9/11 males/females, age=49.10 ± 13.74 years, and BMI=33.12 ± 5.14 kg/m2) with low HDL-C and mild hypercholesterolemia. Hierarchical generalized linear model, adjusted for sex, BMI, and age, has been used to evaluate pre-post treatment changes. A significant increase for HDL-C (β=0.14, p=0.0008) and MCP-1 (β=144.77, p=0.004) and a significant decrease for ApoB/ApoA (β=-0.07, p=0.03), total-C/HDL-C ratio (β=-0.58, p<0.001), and NK response at stimulus low (β=0.43, p=0.04), medium (β=0.40, p<0.001), and high (β=0.42, p=0.001) have been found. These results support the benefits of ALE supplementation on metabolic profile.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30723511 PMCID: PMC6339758 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2069701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Descriptive statistics of the sample at baseline (t0) and after 60 days of treatment (t1).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| MCP-1 (pg/ml) | 509.9 ± 213.08 | 654.7 ± 248.84 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.10 ± 0.21 | 1.23 ± 0.28 |
| VLDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.77 ± 0.36 | 0.66 ± 0.25 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.45 ± 0.83 | 3.43 ± 0.84 |
| Total-C/HDL-Cr | 5.04 ± 1.53 | 4.42 ± 1.40 |
| NK activity 1:10 (% lysis) | 8.44 ± 6.27 | 9.07 ± 7.74 |
| NK activity 1:30 (% lysis) | 15.93 ± 10.43 | 12.78 ± 8.10 |
| NK activity 1:100 (% lysis) | 30.90 ± 13.50 | 26.75 ± 11.33 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.67 ± 0.78 | 1.44 ± 0.55 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.76 ± 0.58 | 4.70 ± 0.41 |
| Insulin (mU/L) | 19.33 ± 18.27 | 14.73 ± 8.01 |
| WC (cm) | 108.65 ± 15.05 | 107.75 ± 15.25 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.28 ± 4.58 | 3.12 ± 1.84 |
| LAP | 81.31 ± 49.03 | 70.48 ± 44.11 |
| ApoB/ApoA ratio | 0.89 ± 0.29 | 0.80 ± 0.32 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 33.12 ± 5.14 | 33.07 ± 5.08 |
Figure 1Pre- and posttreatment means.
Estimate, standard error, and p-value of the treatment effect on the primary and secondary endpoints, evaluated as difference between pre-post treatment, using HGLM.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP-1 | 144.77 | 44.77 | 0.004 |
| HDL-C | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.0008 |
| Total -C/HDL-C ratio | -0.58 | 0.12 | 8.5e-05 |
| TG | -0.23 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| ApoB/ApoA ratio | -0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| HOMA-IR | -0.99 | 0.94 | 0.30 |
| LAP | -10.895 | 5.8037 | 0.0744 |
| VLDL-C | -0.11 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| LDL-C | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.76 |
| Glucose | -0.08 | 0.10 | 0.40 |
| Insulin | -3.69 | 3.63 | 0.32 |
| WC | -0.9000 | 0.3092 | 0.00897 |
All models are adjusted for sex, BMI, and age. In bold significant results (P<0.05).
Estimate, standard error, and p-value of the treatment effect on NK responses at different stimuli, evaluated as difference between pre-post treatment, using HGLM.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Low stimulus | 0.43 | 0.32 |
|
| Medium stimulus | 0.40 | 0.16 |
|
| High stimulus | 0.42 | 0.16 |
|
All models are adjusted for sex, BMI, and age. In bold significant results (P<0.05).
Partial correlation between HDL-C and the variables under study before treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP-1 | -0.57 | -0.82,0.14 |
|
| ApoB/ApoA ratio | -0.69 | -0.88,-0.33 |
|
| HOMA-IR | -0.17 | -0.59,0.31 | 0.49 |
| LAP | -0.50 | -0.78,-0.04 |
|
| NK low stimulus | 0.10 | -0.38,0.54 | 0.69 |
| NK medium stimulus | 0.04 | -0.44,0.49 | 0.89 |
| NK high stimulus | 0.20 | -0.29,0.61 | 0.42 |
| BMI | -0.40 | -0.73,0.08 | 0.10 |
| TG | -0.45 | -0.76,0.02 | 0.06 |
| Insulin | -0.19 | -0.61,0.29 | 0.43 |
| Glucose | -0.19 | -0.60,0.31 | 0.46 |
| WC | -0.34 | -0.70,0.14 | 0.16 |
In bold significant results (P<0.05).
Partial correlation between HDL-C and the variables under study after treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP-1 | -0.43 | -0.74,0.04 | 0.07 |
| ApoB/ApoA ratio | -0.75 | -0.89,-0.42 |
|
| HOMA-IR | -0.18 | -0.59,0.31 | 0.47 |
| LAP | -0.53 | -0.80,-0.08 |
|
| NK low stimulus | 0.39 | -0.09,0.72 | 0.11 |
| NK medium stimulus | -0.05 | -0.50,0.43 | 0.84 |
| NK high stimulus | -0.03 | -0.49,0.44 | 0.89 |
| BMI | -0.32 | -0.68,0.17 | 0.19 |
| TG | -0.54 | -0.81,-0.11 |
|
| Insulin | -0.17 | -0.59,0.32 | 0.49 |
| Glucose | -0.22 | -0.62,0.27 | 0.37 |
| WC | -0.38 | -0.72,0.10 | 0.11 |
In bold significant results (P<0.05).
Figure 2Partial correlation, adjusted for sex and age, between HDL-C and each secondary endpoint before and after treatment.