Kimberly G Blumenthal1, Maxim Topaz2, Li Zhou3, Tyler Harkness4, Roee Sa'adon5, Ofrit Bar-Bachar6, Aidan A Long7. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 2. Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass. 4. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. 5. Treato Ltd, Or Yehuda, Israel. 6. Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. 7. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: aalong@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma is used by 2.6 million Americans annually. Clinical and sterility testing studies identify no risk of contamination or infection from extracts prepared using recommended aseptic techniques, but regulatory concerns persist. Social media can be used to investigate rare adverse effects not captured by traditional studies. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate large social media databases for suggestion of AIT skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) risk and compare this risk to a comparator procedure with a sterile pharmaceutical. METHODS: We analyzed US-restricted data from more than 10 common text-based social media platforms including Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit between 2012 and 2016. We used natural language processing (NLP) to identify posts related to AIT and, separately, influenza vaccination (comparator procedure). NLP was followed by manual review to identify posts suggesting a possible SSTI associated with either AIT or influenza vaccination. SSTI frequencies with 95% CIs were compared. RESULTS: We identified 25,126 AIT posts, which were matched by social media platform to 25,126 influenza vaccination-related posts. NLP identified 4088 (16.3%) AIT posts that required manual review, with 6 posts (0.02%; 95% CI, 0.005%-0.043%) indicative of possible AIT-related SSTI. NLP identified 2689 (10.7%) influenza posts that required manual review, with 7 posts (0.03%; 95% CI, 0.007%-0.048%) indicative of possible influenza vaccination-related SSTI. CONCLUSIONS: Social media data suggest that SSTI from AIT and influenza vaccination are equally rare events. Given that AIT's SSTI risk appears comparable to the risk using a sterile pharmaceutical based on social media data, current aseptic technique procedures seem safe.
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma is used by 2.6 million Americans annually. Clinical and sterility testing studies identify no risk of contamination or infection from extracts prepared using recommended aseptic techniques, but regulatory concerns persist. Social media can be used to investigate rare adverse effects not captured by traditional studies. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate large social media databases for suggestion of AIT skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) risk and compare this risk to a comparator procedure with a sterile pharmaceutical. METHODS: We analyzed US-restricted data from more than 10 common text-based social media platforms including Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit between 2012 and 2016. We used natural language processing (NLP) to identify posts related to AIT and, separately, influenza vaccination (comparator procedure). NLP was followed by manual review to identify posts suggesting a possible SSTI associated with either AIT or influenza vaccination. SSTI frequencies with 95% CIs were compared. RESULTS: We identified 25,126 AIT posts, which were matched by social media platform to 25,126 influenza vaccination-related posts. NLP identified 4088 (16.3%) AIT posts that required manual review, with 6 posts (0.02%; 95% CI, 0.005%-0.043%) indicative of possible AIT-related SSTI. NLP identified 2689 (10.7%) influenza posts that required manual review, with 7 posts (0.03%; 95% CI, 0.007%-0.048%) indicative of possible influenza vaccination-related SSTI. CONCLUSIONS: Social media data suggest that SSTI from AIT and influenza vaccination are equally rare events. Given that AIT's SSTI risk appears comparable to the risk using a sterile pharmaceutical based on social media data, current aseptic technique procedures seem safe.
Authors: Linda Cox; Harold Nelson; Richard Lockey; Christopher Calabria; Thomas Chacko; Ira Finegold; Michael Nelson; Richard Weber; David I Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; David A Khan; David M Lang; Richard A Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Jay M Portnoy; Christopher Randolph; Diane E Schuller; Sheldon L Spector; Stephen Tilles; Dana Wallace Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Dana V Wallace; Mark S Dykewicz; David I Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David A Khan; David M Lang; Richard A Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Jay M Portnoy; Christopher C Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon L Spector; Stephen A Tilles Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: S R Durham; S M Walker; E M Varga; M R Jacobson; F O'Brien; W Noble; S J Till; Q A Hamid; K T Nouri-Aria Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-08-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kyungmi Woo; Victoria Adams; Paula Wilson; Li-Heng Fu; Kenrick Cato; Sarah Collins Rossetti; Margaret McDonald; Jingjing Shang; Maxim Topaz Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 4.669