Literature DB >> 30721689

Estimated Prevalence and Incidence of Dry Eye Disease Based on Coding Analysis of a Large, All-age United States Health Care System.

Reza Dana1, John L Bradley2, Annie Guerin3, Irina Pivneva3, Ipek Özer Stillman4, Amber M Evans5, Debra A Schaumberg6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess overall prevalence, annual prevalence, and incidence of dry eye disease (DED) in a large, representative population in the United States.
DESIGN: Prevalence and incidence study.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis using the Department of Defense (DOD) Military Health System (MHS) data on beneficiary medical claims from United States DOD military and civilian facilities, January 1, 2003 through March 31, 2015. PATIENT POPULATION: Using an algorithm, medical diagnostic codes indicative of DED and prescriptions for cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion identified a DED population from 9.7 million MHS beneficiaries (DOD service members, retirees, and dependents, aged 2-80+ years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: DED overall prevalence (2003-2015), annual prevalence (2005-2012), and annual incidence (2008-2012) stratified by sex, age group, and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Ninth Revision diagnosis code grouping.
RESULTS: DED prevalence was 5.28% overall, 7.78% among female beneficiaries, 2.96% among male beneficiaries and increased with age from 0.20% for ages 2-17 years, to 11.66% for individuals aged 50+ years. Annual prevalence increased from 0.8% to 3.0% overall, from 1.4% to 4.5% in female beneficiaries, and from 0.3% to 1.6% in male beneficiaries. Annual prevalence increased across age groups starting at age 18-39, 0.1%-0.6%, to age 50+, 1.8%-6.0%. Annual incidence increased from 0.6% to 0.9% overall, from 0.8% to 1.2% in female beneficiaries, and from 0.3% to 0.6% in male beneficiaries. Across age groups, annual incidence increased starting at age 18-39 (0.2%-0.3%), to age 50+ (1.0%-1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: DED overall prevalence, annual prevalence, and incidence were found to increase over time for all demographics. These findings highlight the continued importance of research and therapeutic development for this common condition.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30721689     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  36 in total

1.  Nanomolar Potency Aminophenyltriazine CFTR Activator Reverses Corneal Epithelial Injury in a Mouse Model of Dry Eye.

Authors:  Xiaolan Chen; Sujin Lee; Tianyi Zhang; Tianying Duan; Neel D Pasricha; Julie M Schallhorn; Marc H Levin; Vuk Koprivica; Alan S Verkman
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Assessing the Risk Factors For Diagnosed Symptomatic Dry Eye Using a Smartphone App: Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Ngamjit Kasetsuwan; Olan Suwan-Apichon; Kaevalin Lekhanont; Varintorn Chuckpaiwong; Usanee Reinprayoon; Somporn Chantra; Vilavun Puangsricharern; Lalida Pariyakanok; Pinnita Prabhasawat; Nattaporn Tesavibul; Winai Chaidaroon; Napaporn Tananuvat; Chakree Hirunpat; Nauljira Prakairungthong; Wiwan Sansanayudh; Chareenun Chirapapaisan; Pakornkit Phrueksaudomchai
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.947

3.  Efficacy and retention of silicone punctal plugs for treatment of dry eye in patients with and without ocular graft-versus-host-disease.

Authors:  Rohan Bir Singh; Ann Yung; Giulia Coco; Shruti Sinha; Thomas H Dohlman; Jia Yin; Reza Dana
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Aged Mice Exhibit Severe Exacerbations of Dry Eye Disease with an Amplified Memory Th17 Cell Response.

Authors:  William Foulsham; Sharad K Mittal; Yukako Taketani; Yihe Chen; Takeshi Nakao; Sunil K Chauhan; Reza Dana
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Sensory neurons directly promote angiogenesis in response to inflammation via substance P signaling.

Authors:  Lingjia Liu; Reza Dana; Jia Yin
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.834

6.  Association of Severity of Dry Eye Disease with Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study.

Authors:  Giampaolo Greco; Maxwell Pistilli; Penny A Asbell; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 14.277

7.  A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Lipid-Based Lubricant Eye Drops for the Management of Evaporative Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Gary Jerkins; Jack V Greiner; Louis Tong; Jacqueline Tan; Joseph Tauber; Ali Mearza; Sruthi Srinivasan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-18

8.  Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for the Long-Term Treatment of Ocular Pain.

Authors:  Kristen Zayan; Shruti Aggarwal; Elizabeth Felix; Roy Levitt; Konstantinos Sarantopoulos; Anat Galor
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-20

9.  Shift Work and Dry Eye Disease in the Korean Working Population: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Joonho Ahn; So-Jung Ryu; Jihun Song; Hyoung-Ryoul Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Ocular Signs and Ocular Comorbidities in Monoclonal Gammopathy: Analysis of 80 Subjects.

Authors:  Kitti Kormányos; Klaudia Kovács; Orsolya Németh; Gábor Tóth; Gábor László Sándor; Anita Csorba; Cecília Nóra Czakó; Achim Langenbucher; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy; Gergely Varga; László Gopcsa; Gábor Mikala; Nóra Szentmáry
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.