Literature DB >> 30721436

ESSIMAGE: a tool for the assessment of the agroecological performance of agricultural production systems.

Meriam Trabelsi1,2,3, Elisabeth Mandart4, Philippe Le Grusse4,5, Jean-Paul Bord6,5.   

Abstract

Over the last few years, intensive agriculture has often been denounced as a source of negative effects, particularly at the environmental and health level (overexploitation of natural resources, degradation of their quality, appearance and development of several diseases, etc.). Reducing the excessive use of agricultural inputs for the protection of the environment and the preservation of human and animal health is a social requirement nowadays. Investing in more sustainable agricultural models which make it possible to reduce, or even eliminate the risks, has become urgent. A possible solution may be to resort to agroecological systems. In order to be sustainable, these new systems must be performant at the agronomic, economic, social, and environmental levels. There is a multitude of tools for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. These tools are inappropriate for organic and agroecological systems, and do not make it possible to measure the agroecological transition performance of farms (Trabelsi et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:139-156, 2016; Trabelsi 2017). This research project aims to design a decision support tool in order to help farms throughout the agroecological transition process, to assess the performance of this transition, and to put forward improvement scenarios. Contrary to other assessment methods, ESSIMAGE (Evaluation and Simulation of Agroecological Systems) is based on both pressure and impact indicators, and takes the specificities of agricultural production systems into account. It is a dynamic tool which not only makes it possible to assess farm performance at the present moment but also to consider the future by putting forward possible alternative improvement scenarios and by simulating their consequences at a later stage. ESSIMAGE is based on the interaction of two elements: agro-environmental, social, and economic indicators, and the GIS (Geographic Information System) software. This tool has been tested as part of a CASDAR "Post-MAET Gimone" ( agriculture.gouv.fr/ministere/mobilisation-collective-pour-lagroecologie. ) project on the subject of "Collective mobilization for agroecology" by using farm data, most of the farms having been involved in an agro-environmental measure for the progressive reduction of phytosanitary treatments since 2008. It has made it possible to compare the agroecological performances of these farms with an optimal situation, as well as with each other. Considering the research objectives and the approaches discussed, this study is an original step in the development of agricultural management strategies in favor of agroecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agroecological transition; Assessment; Decision support tool; GIS; Indicators; Intensive agriculture; Performance; Risks

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30721436     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04387-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

Review 1.  Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices.

Authors:  David Tilman; Kenneth G Cassman; Pamela A Matson; Rosamond Naylor; Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  How to measure the agroecological performance of farming in order to assist with the transition process.

Authors:  Meriam Trabelsi; Elisabeth Mandart; Philippe Le Grusse; Jean-Paul Bord
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates.

Authors:  Mikhail A Beketov; Ben J Kefford; Ralf B Schäfer; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Assessing plant protection practices using pressure indicator and toxicity risk indicators: analysis of therelationship between these indicators for improved risk management, application in viticulture.

Authors:  Mghirbi Oussama; Ellefi Kamel; Le Grusse Philippe; Mandart Elisabeth; Fabre Jacques; Ayadi Habiba; Bord Jean-Paul
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Pesticides and human health.

Authors:  Aaron Blair; Beate Ritz; Catharina Wesseling; Laura Beane Freeman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Risk assessment for honey bees and pesticides--recent developments and 'new issues'.

Authors:  Helen M Thompson
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.845

7.  OptiPhy, a technical-economic optimisation model for improving the management of plant protection practices in agriculture: a decision-support tool for controlling the toxicity risks related to pesticides.

Authors:  Oussama Mghirbi; Philippe LE Grusse; Jacques Fabre; Elisabeth Mandart; Jean-Paul Bord
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Parkinson's disease and residential exposure to maneb and paraquat from agricultural applications in the central valley of California.

Authors:  Sadie Costello; Myles Cockburn; Jeff Bronstein; Xinbo Zhang; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards.

Authors:  Md Wasim Aktar; Dwaipayan Sengupta; Ashim Chowdhury
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2009-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.