Literature DB >> 26527345

How to measure the agroecological performance of farming in order to assist with the transition process.

Meriam Trabelsi1,2,3, Elisabeth Mandart4, Philippe Le Grusse4,5, Jean-Paul Bord6,5.   

Abstract

The use of plant protection products enables farmers to maximize economic performance and yields, but in return, the environment and human health can be greatly affected because of their toxicity. There are currently strong calls for farmers to reduce the use of these toxic products for the preservation of the environment and the human health, and it has become urgent to invest in more sustainable models that help reduce these risks. One possible solution is the transition toward agroecological production systems. These new systems must be beneficial economically, socially, and environmentally in terms of human health. There are many tools available, based on a range of indicators, for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems on conventional farm holdings. These methods are little suitable to agroecological farms and do not measure the performance of agroecological transition farms. In this article, we therefore develop a model for the strategic definition, guidance, and assistance for a transition to agroecological practices, capable of assessing performance of this transition and simulating the consequences of possible changes. This model was built by coupling (i) a decision-support tool and a technico-economic simulator with (ii) a conceptual model built from the dynamics of agroecological practices. This tool is currently being tested in the framework of a Compte d'Affectation Spéciale pour le Développement Agricole et Rural (CASDAR) project (CASDAR: project launched in 2013 by the French Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, on the theme "collective mobilisation for agroecology," http://agriculture.gouv.fr/Appel-a-projets-CASDAR ) using data from farms, most of which are engaged in agroenvironmental process and reducing plant protection treatments since 2008.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agroecological practices; Assistance; Guidance; Performance; Plant protection products; Risks; Transition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26527345     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5680-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  3 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic maize and the evolution of landrace diversity in Mexico. The importance of farmers' behavior.

Authors:  Mauricio R Bellon; Julien Berthaud
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates.

Authors:  Mikhail A Beketov; Ben J Kefford; Ralf B Schäfer; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture.

Authors:  K G Cassman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  ESSIMAGE: a tool for the assessment of the agroecological performance of agricultural production systems.

Authors:  Meriam Trabelsi; Elisabeth Mandart; Philippe Le Grusse; Jean-Paul Bord
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  OptiPhy, a technical-economic optimisation model for improving the management of plant protection practices in agriculture: a decision-support tool for controlling the toxicity risks related to pesticides.

Authors:  Oussama Mghirbi; Philippe LE Grusse; Jacques Fabre; Elisabeth Mandart; Jean-Paul Bord
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.