Literature DB >> 30721328

[Cost effectiveness of using disposable ureterorenoscopes for diagnosis and treatment].

M J P Hennig1, T Knoll2, J P Struck3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30721328     DOI： 10.1007/s00120-019-0867-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN： 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.

Authors:  Eugene Kramolowsky; Zachary McDowell; Blake Moore; Brigette Booth; Nada Wood
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  N F Davis; M R Quinlan; C Browne; N R Bhatt; R P Manecksha; F T D'Arcy; N Lawrentschuk; D M Bolton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.

Authors:  Derek B Hennessey; Grzegorz L Fojecki; Nathan P Papa; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien Bolton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Dylan S Isaacson; Kazumi Taguchi; David T Tzou; Ryan S Hsi; Benjamin A Sherer; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Kazumi Taguchi; Manint Usawachintachit; David T Tzou; Benjamin A Sherer; Ian Metzler; Dylan Isaacson; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.942
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.