| Literature DB >> 30721138 |
Jiangtao Zhang1,2, Wenbo Luo1,2, Jie Zeng1, Tianjiao Zhang1, Weiyan Zhou1, Haijian Zhao1, Ying Yan1, Cuihua Hu1, Rong Ma1, Jing Wang1, Wenxiang Chen3,4, Chuanbao Zhang3,4.
Abstract
Background Serum uric acid is a critical clinical indicator, and results without equivalence among laboratories cause troubles for disease diagnosis and patient management. External quality assessment (EQA) is a common tool for enhancing harmonization/standardization, therefore, the National Center for Clinical Laboratories in China has initiated a category 1 EQA for serum uric acid measurement since 2010 for evaluating its process of standardization. Methods Commutable EQA samples with target values assigned by reference measurement procedures were sent to participant laboratories. Both concentrations were measured 15 times in 3 days then means and intra-laboratory coefficient of variations (CVs) were reported. Biological variation criteria were used for analysis with CLIA88 criteria as a comparison. Results A total of 1250 laboratories participated in EQA programs from 2010 to 2017, pass rates calculated according to desirable specifications in biological variation database were on a rise overall and inter-laboratory mean bias and CVs were on a decrease. Homogeneous systems showed better inter-laboratory CVs and pass rates than heterogeneous systems. For the mostly used measurement systems; Abbott, Beckman, Roche Modular, Siemens and Hitachi showed desirable performances other than Roche Cobas, according to biological variation criteria. Conclusions Our study provides reliable information on the standardization of measurement procedures for serum uric acid for manufacturers and laboratories. Further improvements for standardization are still needed to make laboratories more patient-centered.Entities:
Keywords: bias; biological variation; coefficient of variation; external quality assessment; serum uric acid; standardization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30721138 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med ISSN: 1434-6621 Impact factor: 3.694