Literature DB >> 30720678

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Access and Outcomes of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Among Liver Transplant Candidates With Renal Dysfunction in the United States.

Su-Hsin Chang1, Mei Wang1, Xiaoyan Liu2, Tarek Alhamad3, Krista L Lentine4, Mark A Schnitzler4, Graham A Colditz1, Yikyung Park1, William C Chapman5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) allocation system was implemented, the proportion of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) has increased significantly. However, whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in access to SLKT and post-SLKT survival remains understudied.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥18 years with renal dysfunction on the liver transplant (LT) waiting list was obtained from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m at listing for LT. Multilevel time-to-competing-events regression adjusting for center effect was used to examine the likelihood of receiving SLKT. Inverse probability of treatment weighted survival analyses were used to analyze posttransplant mortality outcomes.
RESULTS: For patients with renal dysfunction at listing for LT, not listed for simultaneous kidney transplant, non-Hispanic black (NHB) and Hispanic patients were more likely to receive SLKT than non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients (NHB: multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-4.65; Hispanic: aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.14-3.60). For post-SLKT outcomes, compared to NHW patients, NHB patients had a lower mortality risk before 24 months (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97) but had a higher mortality risk (aHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.59-2.55) afterward; in contrast, Hispanic patients had a lower overall mortality risk than NHW patients (aHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.74).
CONCLUSIONS: In the MELD era, racial/ethnic differences exist in access and survival of SLKT for patients with renal dysfunction at listing for LT. Future studies are warranted to examine whether these differences remain in the post-SLK allocation policy era.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30720678      PMCID: PMC6779036          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  36 in total

1.  Impact of MELD-based allocation on end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation.

Authors:  P Sharma; D E Schaubel; M K Guidinger; N P Goodrich; A O Ojo; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Proceedings of Consensus Conference on Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation (SLK).

Authors:  J D Eason; T A Gonwa; C L Davis; R S Sung; D Gerber; R D Bloom
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Outcomes of liver transplantation alone after listing for simultaneous kidney: comparison to simultaneous liver kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Bashar Hmoud; Yong-Fang Kuo; Russell H Wiesner; Ashwani K Singal
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.

Authors:  Sandrine Katsahian; Christian Boudreau
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.126

6.  Pretransplant renal function predicts survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Satheesh Nair; Sumita Verma; Paul J Thuluvath
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Amy S Kelley; Julia Paris; Katherine Roza; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison; Melissa D Aldridge
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Race: a critical factor in organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation?

Authors:  D E Eckhoff; B M McGuire; C J Young; M T Sellers; L R Frenette; S L Hudson; J L Contreras; S Bynon
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1998-11

9.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Liver Disease in the United States: An Analysis from UNOS Database.

Authors:  Yefei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-03-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Trends in Discard of Kidneys from Hepatitis C Viremic Donors in the United States.

Authors:  Su-Hsin Chang; Massini Merzkani; Krista L Lentine; Mei Wang; David A Axelrod; Siddiq Anwar; Mark A Schnitzler; Jason Wellen; William C Chapman; Tarek Alhamad
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Association of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution With Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Su-Hsin Chang; Massini Merzkani; Haris Murad; Mei Wang; Benjamin Bowe; Krista L Lentine; Ziyad Al-Aly; Tarek Alhamad
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.