BACKGROUND: Trace metal concentrations may affect cardiometabolic risk, but the role of prenatal exposure is unclear. We examined (1) the relation between blood metal concentrations during pregnancy and child cardiometabolic risk factors; (2) overall effects of metals mixture (essential vs. nonessential); and (3) interactions between metals. METHODS: We measured 11 metals in maternal second-trimester whole blood in a prospective birth cohort in Mexico City. In children 4-6 years old, we measured body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and blood pressure (N = 609); and plasma hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, leptin, and adiponectin (N = 411). We constructed cardiometabolic component scores using age- and sex-adjusted z scores and averaged five scores to create a global risk score. We estimated linear associations of each metal with individual z scores and used Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression to assess metal mixtures and interactions. RESULTS: Higher total metals were associated with lower HbA1c, leptin, and systolic blood pressure, and with higher adiponectin and non-HDL cholesterol. We observed no interactions between metals. Higher selenium was associated with lower triglycerides in linear (β = -1.01 z score units per 1 unit ln(Se), 95% CI = -1.84, -0.18) and Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression models. Manganese was associated with decreased HbA1c in linear models (β = -0.32 and 95% CI = -0.61, -0.03). Antimony and arsenic were associated with lower leptin in Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression models. Essential metals were more strongly associated with cardiometabolic risk than were nonessential metals. CONCLUSIONS: Low essential metals during pregnancy were associated with increased cardiometabolic risk factors in childhood.
BACKGROUND: Trace metal concentrations may affect cardiometabolic risk, but the role of prenatal exposure is unclear. We examined (1) the relation between blood metal concentrations during pregnancy and child cardiometabolic risk factors; (2) overall effects of metals mixture (essential vs. nonessential); and (3) interactions between metals. METHODS: We measured 11 metals in maternal second-trimester whole blood in a prospective birth cohort in Mexico City. In children 4-6 years old, we measured body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and blood pressure (N = 609); and plasma hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, leptin, and adiponectin (N = 411). We constructed cardiometabolic component scores using age- and sex-adjusted z scores and averaged five scores to create a global risk score. We estimated linear associations of each metal with individual z scores and used Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression to assess metal mixtures and interactions. RESULTS: Higher total metals were associated with lower HbA1c, leptin, and systolic blood pressure, and with higher adiponectin and non-HDL cholesterol. We observed no interactions between metals. Higher selenium was associated with lower triglycerides in linear (β = -1.01 z score units per 1 unit ln(Se), 95% CI = -1.84, -0.18) and Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression models. Manganese was associated with decreased HbA1c in linear models (β = -0.32 and 95% CI = -0.61, -0.03). Antimony and arsenic were associated with lower leptin in Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression models. Essential metals were more strongly associated with cardiometabolic risk than were nonessential metals. CONCLUSIONS: Low essential metals during pregnancy were associated with increased cardiometabolic risk factors in childhood.
Authors: Qixuan Chen; David H Garabrant; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Roderick J A Little; Michael R Elliott; Brenda Gillespie; Biling Hong; Shih-Yuan Lee; James M Lepkowski; Alfred Franzblau; Peter Adriaens; Avery H Demond; Donald G Patterson Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Martin Laclaustra; Saverio Stranges; Ana Navas-Acien; Jose M Ordovas; Eliseo Guallar Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Ana Navas-Acien; Ellen K Silbergeld; Richey Sharrett; Emma Calderon-Aranda; Elizabeth Selvin; Eliseo Guallar Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: J Leigh Leasure; Anand Giddabasappa; Shawntay Chaney; Jerry E Johnson; Konstantinos Pothakos; Yuen Sum Lau; Donald A Fox Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: C S Yajnik; S S Deshpande; A A Jackson; H Refsum; S Rao; D J Fisher; D S Bhat; S S Naik; K J Coyaji; C V Joglekar; N Joshi; H G Lubree; V U Deshpande; S S Rege; C H D Fall Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2007-09-13 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: João Paulo B Ximenez; Ariane Zamarioli; Melissa A Kacena; Rommel Melgaço Barbosa; Fernando Barbosa Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Gyeyoon Yim; Lorena Reynaga; Velia Nunez; Caitlin G Howe; Megan E Romano; Yu Chen; Margaret R Karagas; Claudia Toledo-Corral; Shohreh F Farzan Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2022-08-18
Authors: Maria José Rosa; Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz; Adriana Mercado Garcia; Nadya Y Rivera Rivera; Douglas Bush; Alison G Lee; Maritsa Solano-González; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Xin Wang; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Bhramar Mukherjee; William H Herman; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Stephani S Kim; John D Meeker; Alexander P Keil; Max T Aung; Paige A Bommarito; David E Cantonwine; Thomas F McElrath; Kelly K Ferguson Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 8.431