Literature DB >> 30720570

The Role of Intraoperative Navigation in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Alexa J Karkenny1, Joseph R Mendelis, David S Geller, Jaime A Gomez.   

Abstract

An orthopaedic surgeon's knowledge of anatomical landmarks is crucial, but other modalities supplement this by providing guidance and feedback to a surgeon. Advances in imaging have enabled three-dimensional visualization of the surgical field and patient anatomy, whereas advances in computer technology have allowed for real-time tracking of instruments and implants. Together, these innovations have given rise to intraoperative navigation systems. The authors review these advances in intraoperative navigation across orthopaedic subspecialties, focusing on the most recent evidence on patient outcomes and complications, the associated learning curve, and the effects on operative time, radiation exposure, and cost. In spine surgery, navigated pedicle screw placement may increase accuracy and safety, especially valuable when treating complex deformities. Improved accuracy of pelvic and peri-articular tumor resection and percutaneous fixation of acetabular and femoral neck fractures has also been achieved using navigation. Early applications in arthroscopy have included surface-based registration for tunnel positioning for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and osteochondroplasty for femoro-acetabular impingement. Navigated arthroplasty techniques have addressed knee gap balancing and mechanical axis restoration as well as acetabular cup and glenoid baseplate positioning. Among these orthopaedic subspecialties, significant variation is found in the clinical relevance and dedication to research of navigation techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30720570     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of augmented reality in orthopaedic surgery: a comprehensive narrative review.

Authors:  Johnathan R Lex; Robert Koucheki; Jay Toor; David J Backstein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 2.  Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws.

Authors:  Kyle W Morse; Hila Otremski; Kira Page; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-08

3.  Clinical impact of intraoperative cone beam tomography and navigation for displaced acetabular fractures: a comparative study at medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Maroun Rizkallah; Amer Sebaaly; Elias Melhem; Pierre-Emmanuel Moreau; Peter Upex; Pomme Jouffroy; Guillaume Riouallon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Computer navigation-assisted minimally invasive percutaneous screw placement for pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Tong Yu; Xue-Liang Cheng; Yang Qu; Rong-Peng Dong; Ming-Yang Kang; Jian-Wu Zhao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 5.  Preoperative planning for intraoperative navigation guidance.

Authors:  Shahbaaz A Sabri; Philip J York
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  Investigation of the Importance of Knee Position during Femoral Tunnel Reaming; Figure 4 versus Hyperflexion.

Authors:  A Kose; M S Ayas; M C Turgut; O N Altay
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2022-07

7.  A real-time 3D electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in traumatic thoraco-lumbar fractures: implications for efficiency, fluoroscopic time, and accuracy compared with those of conventional fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors:  Yawei Yao; Xiang Jiang; Tanjun Wei; Zhipeng Yao; Boyu Wu; Feng Xu; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.