Takeshi Yoshida1, Marcelo B P Amato2, Brian P Kavanagh3,4, Yuji Fujino1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan. 2. Divisao de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Department of Critical Care Medicine. 4. Department of Anesthesia, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Facilitating spontaneous breathing has been traditionally recommended during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, early, short-term use of neuromuscular blockade appears to improve survival, and spontaneous effort has been shown to potentiate lung injury in animal and clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to describe the beneficial and deleterious effects of spontaneous breathing in ARDS, explain potential mechanisms for harm, and provide contemporary suggestions for clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: Gentle spontaneous effort can improve lung function and prevent diaphragm atrophy. However, accumulating evidence indicates that spontaneous effort may cause or worsen lung and diaphragm injury, especially if the ARDS is severe or spontaneous effort is vigorous. Recently, such effort-dependent lung injury has been termed patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). Finally, several approaches to minimize P-SILI while maintaining some diaphragm activity (e.g. partial neuromuscular blockade, high PEEP) appear promising. SUMMARY: We update and summarize the role of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation in ARDS, which can be beneficial or deleterious, depending on the strength of spontaneous activity and severity of lung injury. Future studies are needed to determine ventilator strategies that minimize injury but maintaining some diaphragm activity.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Facilitating spontaneous breathing has been traditionally recommended during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, early, short-term use of neuromuscular blockade appears to improve survival, and spontaneous effort has been shown to potentiate lung injury in animal and clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to describe the beneficial and deleterious effects of spontaneous breathing in ARDS, explain potential mechanisms for harm, and provide contemporary suggestions for clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: Gentle spontaneous effort can improve lung function and prevent diaphragm atrophy. However, accumulating evidence indicates that spontaneous effort may cause or worsen lung and diaphragm injury, especially if the ARDS is severe or spontaneous effort is vigorous. Recently, such effort-dependent lung injury has been termed patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). Finally, several approaches to minimize P-SILI while maintaining some diaphragm activity (e.g. partial neuromuscular blockade, high PEEP) appear promising. SUMMARY: We update and summarize the role of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation in ARDS, which can be beneficial or deleterious, depending on the strength of spontaneous activity and severity of lung injury. Future studies are needed to determine ventilator strategies that minimize injury but maintaining some diaphragm activity.
Authors: Elena Spinelli; Tommaso Mauri; Jeremy R Beitler; Antonio Pesenti; Daniel Brodie Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Lucas M Fleuren; Tariq A Dam; Michele Tonutti; Daan P de Bruin; Robbert C A Lalisang; Diederik Gommers; Olaf L Cremer; Rob J Bosman; Sander Rigter; Evert-Jan Wils; Tim Frenzel; Dave A Dongelmans; Remko de Jong; Marco Peters; Marlijn J A Kamps; Dharmanand Ramnarain; Ralph Nowitzky; Fleur G C A Nooteboom; Wouter de Ruijter; Louise C Urlings-Strop; Ellen G M Smit; D Jannet Mehagnoul-Schipper; Tom Dormans; Cornelis P C de Jager; Stefaan H A Hendriks; Sefanja Achterberg; Evelien Oostdijk; Auke C Reidinga; Barbara Festen-Spanjer; Gert B Brunnekreef; Alexander D Cornet; Walter van den Tempel; Age D Boelens; Peter Koetsier; Judith Lens; Harald J Faber; A Karakus; Robert Entjes; Paul de Jong; Thijs C D Rettig; Sesmu Arbous; Sebastiaan J J Vonk; Mattia Fornasa; Tomas Machado; Taco Houwert; Hidde Hovenkamp; Roberto Noorduijn Londono; Davide Quintarelli; Martijn G Scholtemeijer; Aletta A de Beer; Giovanni Cinà; Adam Kantorik; Tom de Ruijter; Willem E Herter; Martijn Beudel; Armand R J Girbes; Mark Hoogendoorn; Patrick J Thoral; Paul W G Elbers Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-12-27 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nam Eun Kim; Ala Woo; Song Yee Kim; Ah Young Leem; Youngmok Park; Se Hyun Kwak; Seung Hyun Yong; Kyungsoo Chung; Moo Suk Park; Young Sam Kim; Ha Eun Kim; Jin Gu Lee; Hyo Chae Paik; Su Hwan Lee Journal: Respir Res Date: 2021-11-28
Authors: Francesca Simioli; Anna Annunziata; Giorgio Emanuele Polistina; Antonietta Coppola; Valentina Di Spirito; Giuseppe Fiorentino Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-05-22
Authors: Gaetano Florio; Roberta Ribeiro De Santis Santiago; Jacopo Fumagalli; David A Imber; Francesco Marrazzo; Abraham Sonny; Aranya Bagchi; Angela K Fitch; Chika V Anekwe; Marcelo Britto Passos Amato; Pankaj Arora; Robert M Kacmarek; Lorenzo Berra Journal: Chest Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 10.262