Literature DB >> 30720421

Clinical and laboratory-induced colistin-resistance mechanisms in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Christine J Boinett1,2,3, Amy K Cain1,4, Jane Hawkey5,6,7, Nhu Tran Do Hoang2, Nhu Nguyen Thi Khanh8, Duy Pham Thanh2, Janina Dordel1,9, James I Campbell2,3, Nguyen Phu Huong Lan2,10, Matthew Mayho1, Gemma C Langridge1,11, James Hadfield1, Nguyen Van Vinh Chau10, Guy E Thwaites2,3, Julian Parkhill1, Nicholas R Thomson1,12, Kathryn E Holt5,6, Stephen Baker2,13,3.   

Abstract

The increasing incidence and emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii has become a major global health concern. Colistin is a historic antimicrobial that has become commonly used as a treatment for MDR A. baumannii infections. The increase in colistin usage has been mirrored by an increase in colistin resistance. We aimed to identify the mechanisms associated with colistin resistance in A. baumannii using multiple high-throughput-sequencing technologies, including transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (TraDIS), RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate the genotypic changes of colistin resistance in A. baumannii. Using TraDIS, we found that genes involved in drug efflux (adeIJK), and phospholipid (mlaC, mlaF and mlaD) and lipooligosaccharide synthesis (lpxC and lpsO) were required for survival in sub-inhibitory concentrations of colistin. Transcriptomic (RNAseq) analysis revealed that expression of genes encoding efflux proteins (adeI, adeC, emrB, mexB and macAB) was enhanced in in vitro generated colistin-resistant strains. WGS of these organisms identified disruptions in genes involved in lipid A (lpxC) and phospholipid synthesis (mlaA), and in the baeS/R two-component system (TCS). We additionally found that mutations in the pmrB TCS genes were the primary colistin-resistance-associated mechanisms in three Vietnamese clinical colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains. Our results outline the entire range of mechanisms employed in A. baumannii for resistance against colistin, including drug extrusion and the loss of lipid A moieties by gene disruption or modification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acinetobacter baumannii; RNAseq; TraDIS; colistin resistance; multi-drug resistance; whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30720421      PMCID: PMC6421349          DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Genom        ISSN: 2057-5858


Data Summary

1. The PacBio (Pacific Biosciences) sequence data and assembly for BAL062 can be found at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession numbers: ERR581111 andERR581112, ERR581112 (www.ebi.ac.uk/ena). 2. Genome BAL062 has been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers LT594095 (chromosome) and LT594096 (plasmid) (url: www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/LT594095 and www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/LT594096). 3. RNA sequencing, transposon-directed insertion site sequencing and whole-genome sequencing data is available at the ENA (www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under the study accession numbers detailed in Table S1 (available with the online version of this article). Colistin was first introduced into the clinical field in the late 1950s, but its use later declined due to toxicity. In recent years, colistin has been reintroduced as a last-line therapy in treating multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections, including . The rise in colistin-resistant clinical strains has been reported and the lack of new antimicrobials in the pipeline to treat Gram-negative bacteria greatly decreases the chance of a positive outcome in treating MDR infections. We used multiple sequence-based approaches to identify the mechanisms behind the development of colistin resistance in . In addition to other known mechanisms of colistin resistance, we observed recombination events in clinical colistin-resistant strains, a novel mechanism that may contribute to fitness recovery. We also highlight the use of a high-throughput mutagenesis approach that simultaneously assays the genome for novel candidate genes involved in colistin resistance.

Introduction

The incidence of healthcare-acquired infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) and pan-drug resistant has increased dramatically in recent years [1]. With limited alternative treatment strategies available, there has been an increasing use of the polymyxin antimicrobial, colistin, an older generation last-line antimicrobial that is frequently used alone or in combination with tigecycline, carbapenems or rifampicin [2-4]. Despite the use of combination therapy, the incidence of heteroresistance and complete resistance to colistin (colR) alone has been frequently reported in clinical isolates of , and can result in treatment failure [5, 6]. In vivo and in vitro studies of have identified two main genetic mechanisms for the induction of colR: (i) lipooligosaccharide (LOS) modification through the acquisition of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pmrAB; or (ii) the complete loss of the LOS owing to SNPs in genes encoding lipid A biosynthesis genes lpxA, lpxC and lpxD [7]. Alteration or loss of the LOS results in the reduction of the net negative charge of the LOS; thus, decreasing the affinity between colistin and the cell membrane [8-11]. Insertion sequence (IS) elements, such as ISAba1 and ISAba11, have also been associated with the development of colR via the disruption of genes in the lpx gene cluster [12, 13]. Here, we aimed to gain insight into the genetic mechanisms associated with colR in isolates from Vietnam. This type of study is essential for cataloguing the various mechanisms associated with the development of antimicrobial resistance in in clinical and in vitro generated colR mechanisms. This is particularly relevant given the different forms of colistin used clinically, such as colistin methanosulphate for therapy and colistin sulphate for selective decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract [14]. Previous studies have utilized genomic and transcriptomic analysis of in vivo and in vitro induced colR mutants to determine mechanisms associated with resistance; however, genome-wide high-throughput mutagenesis has not been conducted. In this study, we used a colistin susceptible (colS) strain (BAL062) to generate a mutant library to assay for genes required for survival in sub-inhibitory concentrations of colistin. Additionally, we used a controlled directed-evolution approach to generate a colR variant from a colistin-susceptible MDR isolated from a patient with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) on an adult intensive care unit in a Vietnamese hospital to investigate the genetic and transcriptional changes in the colR cultures [15]. We additionally performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on three clinical VAP colR isolated between 2012 and 2013 from the same ward to assess the mechanisms and relation, if any, to in vitro-derived colR .

Methods

All four MDR organisms used in this study were collected as part of a larger study investigating the aetiology of VAP at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, in 2009 [16]. These organisms, BAL062, BAL505, BAL546 and BAL719, were isolates from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). BAL062 (colS) [17] was used to generate the transposon library and also to generate a colR variant for the RNA sequencing (RNAseq) experiments. BAL505, BAL546 and BAL719 were all determined to be clinically colR by disc diffusion [16] and were selected for WGS.

Susceptibility testing

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the broth dilution method according to methods described elsewhere [18]. MICs were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [19].

Inducing colistin resistance

Duplicate cultures (C1 and C2) were subjected to serial daily passage on Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar (Oxoid) plates with increasing concentrations (double dilutions) of colistin (1–128 mg l−1; Sigma-Aldrich) until the cultures were able to grow in 128 mg colistin l−1 (MIC >128 mg l−1), i.e. ‘endpoint’. The endpoints for C1 and C2 were day 6 and day 5, respectively. Briefly, approximately 109 c.f.u. were resuspended in 100 µl PBS (0.9 %) and 3 µl was spotted onto agar plates with increasing concentrations of colistin sulphate ranging from 1 to 128 mg l−1 (serial dilutions) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Colonies (>20 colonies) were taken from the plate with the highest concentration of colistin sulphate from each culture (C1/C2) and resuspended in 100 µl 0.9 % PBS, which was used to inoculate a fresh batch of plates containing colistin. This procedure was repeated for the duration of the experiment (5/6 days) until the defined endpoint. At key time points, day 0 (WT), at 32 mg colistin l−1, midpoint (64 mg colistin l−1) and endpoint (128 mg colistin l−1), 10 µl cell suspension was used to inoculate 10 ml fresh MH broth (Oxoid) and cultures were incubated at 37 °C with agitation. RNA and DNA were extracted at mid-log phase and after overnight incubation for RNAseq and WGS, respectively. No 32 mg colistin l−1 time point was collected for C2, as it achieved midpoint colR after one serial passage.

PacBio (Pacific Biosciences) sequencing of BAL062

Genomic DNA was sequenced using the PacBio RSII sequencer (PacBio), as previously described [20]. This yielded >65 094 individual reads with an N50 of 8.8 kb (post-filtering), generating at least 100× coverage. De novo assembly of the resulting reads was performed using HGAP.3 (PacBio). The genomes were annotated with Prokka [21] and set to start at dnaA. The sequence data and assembly can be found in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession numbers ERR581111 and ERR581112, and (chromosome) LT594095 and (plasmid) LT594096.

WGS

DNA was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq or HiSeq2000 (Illumina) using a method described elsewhere [22]. These data have been deposited in the ENA (Table S1). The clinical isolates were mapped onto the GC2 (global clone 2) 1652–2 reference genome (GenBank accession no. CP001921.1), as with previous VAP and carriage isolates [15], to identify SNPs using a previously described method [23]. Accession numbers for the VAP and carriage isolates are shown in Table S2. SNPs in the pmr locus were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Table 3) using the primers detailed in Table S3. Reads from the in vitro colR-generated organism were mapped to a complete genome sequence of BAL062. SNPs were determined as previously described using the RedDog mapping pipeline (https://github.com/katholt/RedDog) [15]. To identify regions disrupted by IS elements, the BAL062 reference genome was annotated using ISSaga (www-is.biotoul.fr/) to identify ISs for screening with ISMapper [24].
Table 3.

Summary of amino acid changes identified in colistin-resistant clinical isolates

OrganismAmino acid changes in PmrBMIC (mg l−1)
BAL505H266Y24
BAL543L94W16
BAL719P170L64

Transcriptomics and differential expression analysis

RNA was extracted from the initial, midpoint and endpoint C1 and C2 cultures at OD600 0.5+/−0.05 using a modified phenol/chloroform extraction protocol [25]. Ribosomal RNA was depleted using a Ribo-Zero Magnetic kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies). The libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Illumina protocol and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. Reads were mapped onto the BAL062 reference using smalt v0.7.4 and the resulting mapped reads were used for differential expression analysis, which was performed using DESeq (v. 1.8.2) [26]. Read counts from the colR cultures, grown in the presence (64 or 128 mg l−1) or absence of colistin, were compared to the colistin-naïve initial culture to determine the genes with altered expression during colR. In addition, the initial colistin-naïve culture was compared to the BAL062 reference to remove genes with differential expression in response to ageing on solid media. Genes with a log2 fold-change (log2FC) of >1.5 (increased expression) or a log2FC ≤1.5 (decreased expression) and a q value <0.05 were considered in this analysis.

Transposon mutant library generation and sequencing

The transposon mutant library in WT BAL062 was generated using an EZ:Tn5 transposon containing a kanamycin-resistance cassette (Epicentre Biotechnologies), as described previously [27]. The colony number was estimated and cells batch pooled as described in [28] to yield a total of 600 000 cells in the library. For the experiment, approximately 1×109 cells were inoculated into 10 ml MH broth containing 0.05 mg colistin sulphate l−1 (1/10th MIC; Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated overnight in a shaking incubator at 37 °C. The control did not contain colistin and experimental conditions were assessed in duplicate. The culture was serially passaged, taking 100 µl and inoculating 10 ml fresh broth with the same amount of colistin or none for the control. After an overnight incubation, DNA was extracted from 2 ml culture using the Wizard genomic DNA purification protocol (Promega) and sequenced as previously described [29].

Analysis of transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (TraDIS) data

TraDIS sequence analysis was performed as previously described [29, 30]. Significant differences in mutant frequencies between the colistin-exposed library and the control were determined by using the edgeR package [31]. Only genes with a fold-change (log2FC) of >2 were considered and a corrected P value (q value, Benjamini Hochberg, of <0.05). Table S4 shows the insertion frequency results of the base library used in all challenge experiments.

Recombination testing

We reconstructed a phylogenetic tree (midpoint rooted) of the colR organisms and a subset of isolates from VAP (n=50) and asymptomatic carriage (n=16) from a previously reported study [16] using RAxML v7.8.6 with the GTRGAMMA model [32] and putative recombination blocks were predicted using gubbins, as previously described [33]. Results were viewed using Phandango (http://jameshadfield.github.io/phandango/)[34].

Results and Discussion

Intrinsic mediators of colistin resistance in

We used a TraDIS screen to investigate the intrinsic mediators of colR by exposing a colS transposon library to a sub-inhibitory concentration of colistin. High-throughput transposon mutagenesis methods, such as TraDIS, have been commonly used to assay for essential genes and genes required for survival in a given experimental condition (reviewed in [35]). We constructed a Tn5 library in a GC2 isolate, BAL062, from a patient with VAP. The library consisted of >115 000 unique mutants (roughly 1 insertion every 35 bp). We sequenced the base library and identified 445 essential genes (Table S4) that had an insertion index ≤0.0047, accounting for ~12 % of the genome. This base library was used in all subsequent TraDIS experiments in the presence or absence (control) of colistin sulphate (0.5 mg l−1). Candidate genes required for colistin tolerance (where mutants are lost under the experimental conditions) or those whose loss is beneficial in the presence of colistin (where mutants expand under the experimental conditions) were determined as previously described [28, 29]. We identified 22 candidate genetic loci that were required for colistin tolerance (Table 1). The identified loci included genes that were directly involved in LOS synthesis (lpxO and lpsC) and peptidoglycan synthesis (mcrB and galE), and genes involved in transcription (sigX) and translation (rplN, rpmA and rpsO). We also identified a glycosyl transferase, mfpsA (similar to lpsB), which has been previously identified in transposon mutagenesis studies as being important for LOS synthesis [36]. Notably, sigX in has been shown to be involved in modifying the cell envelope and conferring resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides [37]. Additionally, a recent study using TraDIS to investigate candidate genes involved in colistin resistance identified multiple genes involved in membrane biogenesis and cellular integrity as important for colistin tolerance [38].
Table 1.

genes involved in colistin tolerance identified by TraDIS

Locus tagGene namePredicted functionlog2FCq value
Candidate genes involved in colistin tolerance
BAL062_00718Hypothetical protein−4.465.99e−08
BAL062_00584Glycosyltransferase, uncharacterized protein conserved in bacteria−4.366.56e−12
BAL062_00901sigXRNA polymerase factor sigma-70−4.311.51e−07
BAL062_00589Glycosyltransferase involved in LOS biosynthesis−3.821.17e−22
BAL062_03855tuaD_1Udg/UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase−3.812.87e−04
BAL062_03869tuaD_2UDP-glucose/GDP-mannose dehydrogenase−3.819.04e−10
BAL062_03850manBPhosphomannomutase−3.784.25e−06
BAL062_00588Hypothetical protein−3.635.50e−12
BAL062_00587UDP-d-galactose: (glucosyl)lip opolysaccharide-1,6-d-galactosyltransferase, glycosyl transferases group 1−3.591.46e−21
BAL062_00586lpsCLipooligosaccharide core biosynthesis glycosyl transferase, glycosyl transferase family 2−3.592.07e−21
BAL062_03854pgiGlucose-6-phosphate isomerase−3.526.12e−08
BAL062_03856galUUTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase−3.373.83e−02
BAL062_03481mfpsALipopolysaccharide 1,2-N-acetylglucosaminetransferase, glycosyl transferases group 1−3.345.86e−05
BAL062_01632rsePPutative membrane-associated Zn-dependent proteases 1−3.298.93e−07
BAL062_03605lpxOβ-Hydroxylase, aspartyl/asparaginyl β-hydroxylase−3.253.70e−06
BAL062_03853galE_2UDP-glucose 4-epimerase−3.113.19e−29
BAL062_00384mlaCToluene tolerance protein (Ttg2D)/mlaC−2.792.93e−08
BAL062_01261mrcBMurein polymerase, penicillin-binding protein 1B−2.774.92e−12
BAL062_00383ttg2CToluene tolerance efflux transporter (ABC superfamily)/mlaD−2.662.37e−10
BAL062_00585icaBPutative polysaccharide deacetylase, poly-β-1,6-N-acetyl-d-glucosamine N-deacetylase precursor,−2.471.79e−02
BAL062_00381ttg2AToluene tolerance efflux transporter (ABC superfamily)/mlaF−2.453.32e−13
Candidate genes contributing to colistin sensitivity
BAL062_03783guaA_3GMP synthase, GMP synthase [glutamine-hydrolysing]5.866.64e−02
BAL062_03861lstPutative polysaccharide biosynthesis protein, glycosyltransferase family 525.866.64e−02
BAL062_02787Hypothetical protein4.236.01e−03
BAL062_03154ligADNA ligase3.834.02e−02
BAL062_00203Putative NAD/FAD-binding protein2.653.33e−05
BAL062_03033Hypothetical protein2.632.58e−02
BAL062_01328TetR family transcriptional regulator, transcriptional regulator BetI, transcriptional repressor2.316.68e−02
BAL062_01331Protein CsuB, uncharacterized secreted protein, spore coat protein U domain2.224.81e−02
BAL062_01669Glycolate/propanediol utilization protein, hypothetical protein, domain of unknown function (DUF336)2.179.73e−02
BAL062_01330Protein CsuA, uncharacterized secreted protein2.135.27e−02
BAL062_01329Protein CsuA/B, uncharacterized secreted protein, spore coat protein U domain2.032.57e−02
BAL062_01333caf1AProtein CsuD, F1 capsule-anchoring protein precursor, fimbrial outer-membrane usher protein PefC, fimbrial usher protein1.931.32e−02
BAL062_01332P pilus assembly protein, chaperone PapD, putative chaperone protein EcpD, Gram-negative pili assembly chaperone, N-terminal domain1.888.15e−02
Candidate genes involved in maintaining cell-surface lipid symmetry [39] were also amongst those that we identified to be required for tolerance to colistin, including ttg2D/mlaC, ttg2A/mlaF and ttg2C/mlaD (Table 1). Other genes within the mla locus were just below the stringent log2FC ≤2 (q value <0.05) cut-off for genes required for tolerance (Table S5). Previous studies have found that the mlaBCD genes are upregulated in colR strains lacking LOS [40] and deletion of any component of the Mla pathway results in outer-membrane (OM) instability [39]. These data highlight the critical role of maintaining the lipid component and stability of the OM in colistin-susceptible organisms in . Candidate genes that were thought to contribute to colistin susceptibility (i.e. the disruption of genes beneficial for survival in the presence of colistin) included putative pilus assembly genes (BAL062_01329, caf1A and BAL062_01332) and a gene encoding a TetR family protein (BAL062_01328) with 99 % DNA sequence similarity to adeN. Previous studies have reported a decrease in the expression of OM structures, such as pili, in response to disruption or damage of the OM that may act to limit membrane spanning surface structures to maintain cellular integrity [40]. AdeN is member of the TetR transcriptional repressor family and has been shown to regulate the expression of adeIJK efflux proteins [41], suggesting the involvement of efflux for survival in the presence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of colistin.

ISAbA1-mediated mlaA, lpx and baeSR gene disruption confers resistance to colistin

To determine the genetic changes in in vitro generated colR organisms, two independent biological replicate cultures (C1 and C2) of BAL062 that achieved an MIC of >64 mg l−1 (midpoint)/ ≥128 mg l−1 (endpoint) were subjected to WGS (Table 2). We detected multiple ISAbA1-mediated disruptions in the lpxC gene in the induced colR organisms (C1 and C2) grown in media supplemented with 64 and 128 mg colistin l−1 (Table 2). The lpxC gene is almost ubiquitous across Gram-negative bacteria and is an essential component of the lipid-A biosynthesis pathway. Mutations in the lpx genes have previously been shown to confer resistance to colistin in [11-13]. We identified only two mutations in yet uncharacterized genes, −404 upstream of a putative OMP gene, BAL062_00181 and BAL062_01694 (Q212*); however, the effect of these mutations in colR or as compensatory mutations requires further investigation.
Table 2.

ISAba1-mediated disruptions in colistin-resistant BAL062-derived

CulturePassage dayColistin concn (mg l−1)Further growth with colistin†Further growth without colistin†
C110None
232NoneNone
564lpxC (572), mlaA (894)lpxC (572), lpxD (828), baeR (159)
6128lpxC (572), mlaA (894)lpxC (572), mlaA (894), −404 upstream of OMP BAL062_00181
C2264lpxC (572), baeS (1033), BAL062_01694 (Q212*)None
5128lpxC (523, 270), mlaA (561), BAL062_01694 (Q212*)lpxC (523, 270), BAL062_01694 (Q212*)

†Gene names indicate ISAba1-disrupted genes and the amino acid positions are given in brackets. Q212* is the nonsense mutation at position 212 in BAL062_01694.

†Gene names indicate ISAba1-disrupted genes and the amino acid positions are given in brackets. Q212* is the nonsense mutation at position 212 in BAL062_01694. We additionally observed the disruption of mlaA (a transmembrane protein) by ISAba1 in both the C1 and C2 colR (≥128 mg l−1) cultures (Table 2). MlaA is an OM lipoprotein of unknown function that has been previously implicated in colR [39]. The disruption of mlaA by ISAba1 suggests this protein contributes toward colistin tolerance. Mutations in this gene have also been observed previously in colR [17]. However, this finding contradicts the results observed using TraDIS, where mlaA inactivation resulted in increased susceptibility. We hypothesize that maintaining cellular integrity is crucial for survival at low sub-inhibitory concentrations (as in the TraDIS experiments) and may be present in a mixed population (Fig. S1); however, once resistance is achieved (directed evolution experiments), the disruption of LOS synthesis, mediated by mutations in lpx, becomes the primary mechanism of resistance and mlaA becomes less critical as colistin can no longer bind to the negatively charged LOS polymer due to charge interactions. We hypothesize that this dynamic shift in resistance mechanisms at the different concentrations of colistin could be a novel colR mechanism employed by associated with tolerance to colistin until full resistance is achieved. The C1 and C2 midpoint cultures grown in the presence of 64 mg colistin sulphate l−1 additionally had ISAba1 disruptions in baeS (C2) or baeR (C1). These loci constitute part of a two-component system (TCS) involved in bacterial stress response and increased expression of multidrug efflux proteins [42-44]. We subjected the C1 culture (baeR disrupted) to RNAseq to investigate any changes in efflux. Surprisingly, we found a ~3- and ~5-fold increase in expression in macAB and adeABC efflux systems, respectively, in the presence of 64 mg colistin l−1 (Fig. 1, Table S6). This is an unusual observation, and we can only hypothesize that other TCSs not yet characterized may be responsible for this observation. Another unexplained observation was the lack of genotypic changes that could account for the C1 culture able to grow in 32 mg colistin l−1 (Table 2). This lack of fixation of a mutant population has previously been reported in a heteroresistant [45]. In a recent study, Band and colleagues [46] described a loss of colR of an otherwise resistant population upon removal of selection, further demonstrating the heteroresistant nature of colistin exposure to bacterial populations. We postulate that this phenomenon may also occur in , where the SNP changes would be present in a subpopulation. However, we would need to carry out further work to confirm this and explain the genetic basis of the would-be out-competition of these mutant variants by WT variants.
Fig. 1.

Transcriptional changes in in vitro generated colistin-resistant Differentially expressed genes common to all colistin-resistant cultures (C1 and C2) grown in the presence of colistin (64 or 128 mg l−1) or without selection compared to the day 0 BAL062 culture (WT). The heat map, obtained using values from DESeq2 analysis, excludes genes that were differentially expressed in the passaged BAL062 culture that was not exposed to any colistin. Blue colours indicate genes with higher expression relative to the comparator, red colours indicate lower expression.

Transcriptional changes in in vitro generated colistin-resistant Differentially expressed genes common to all colistin-resistant cultures (C1 and C2) grown in the presence of colistin (64 or 128 mg l−1) or without selection compared to the day 0 BAL062 culture (WT). The heat map, obtained using values from DESeq2 analysis, excludes genes that were differentially expressed in the passaged BAL062 culture that was not exposed to any colistin. Blue colours indicate genes with higher expression relative to the comparator, red colours indicate lower expression.

Mutation in a zinc peptidase may provide an alternative colistin-resistance mechanism

We further observed a nonsense mutation (Q212) in a zinc peptidase (BAL062_01694) in one of the passage cultures (C2) when grown in 64 and 128 mg colistin l−1. Zinc peptidases catalyse the cleavage of peptide bonds in a metal-dependent manner [47]. The nonsense mutation in colR organisms occurred upstream of the active site (E270), and likely rendered this enzyme inactive. Zinc metalloproteases have been linked in antimicrobial peptide resistance in spp. [48]. This mutation has previously been identified in a colR BAL062 strain and is thought to be involved in OM processing [17].

Mutations in the pmr locus confer colistin resistance in clinical isolates of

We investigated mechanisms of colR in three clinical strains. These organisms were isolated in late 2012 and early 2013 from patients treated with empirical low dose colistin (2.3 mg−1 kg−1 per day). After repeated treatment failure, clinical specimens were taken and the isolates were subjected to WGS after they were found to be resistant to both colistin and meropenem. These three clinical isolates, BAL505, BAL543 and BAL719, had MIC values of 24, 16 and 64 mg colistin l−1, respectively. WGS indicated that all three isolates belonged to GC2, but harboured a large number of non-synonymous SNPs in pmrB relative to the colS GC2 1652–2 reference genome. On further investigation, we observed that the genomes of two of the colR isolates (BAL505 and BAL543) exhibited evidence of substantial recombination with other co-circulating of approximately 700 kb in length with a total of 14 296 SNPs (Fig. 2)(Table S7). Recombination events are frequently reported in the capsule and outer core regions in MDR , and are thought to be an important source of diversification [49-51]. The putative recombinogenic region harboured the pmr locus, which explained the high number of SNPs. We conducted a blastn and blastp search to identify mutations that may confer a colR phenotype. We found BAL505 harboured a H266Y mutation in the histidine kinase domain of pmrB, whilst BAL543 and BAL719 harboured mutations at positions L94W and P170L (Table 3). The P170L mutation has previously been reported in a polymyxin-resistant clinical isolate [8], the other two mutations have not been observed previously in colR. Mutations in the pmrAB locus have previously been shown to confer colR in [7, 14, 52, 53].
Fig. 2.

Inferred recombination in clinical isolates of colistin-resistant These data were visualized using Phandango (https://github.com/jameshadfield/phandango/). (a) A maximum-likelihood tree of the clinical colistin-resistant organisms (BAL505, BAL543 and BAL719) and colistin-sensitive GC strains [42]. (b) Schematic representation of the reference genome. (c) Recombination regions are indicated as coloured blocks relative to the taxa involved, red blocks indicate predicted recombination that occurred on an internal branch, blue blocks are only present in one isolate (I) and the genomic region affected (II). (d) The line graph summarizes the data in (c).

Inferred recombination in clinical isolates of colistin-resistant These data were visualized using Phandango (https://github.com/jameshadfield/phandango/). (a) A maximum-likelihood tree of the clinical colistin-resistant organisms (BAL505, BAL543 and BAL719) and colistin-sensitive GC strains [42]. (b) Schematic representation of the reference genome. (c) Recombination regions are indicated as coloured blocks relative to the taxa involved, red blocks indicate predicted recombination that occurred on an internal branch, blue blocks are only present in one isolate (I) and the genomic region affected (II). (d) The line graph summarizes the data in (c).

Transcriptional analysis of in vitro generated colR strains

We compared genes that were differentially expressed between the two independent colR organisms in the presence and absence of colistin, midpoint and endpoint for C1 and endpoint for C2 (Tables S1 and S8). To rule out changes in expression as a result of passaging, we compared aged colonies to an independent culture maintained over the same period without antimicrobial selection.

Genes with decreased expression

ColR cultures (C1 and C2) grown in either the presence (64 and 128 mg l−1) or absence of colistin exhibited a decreased expression of genes involved in metabolic processes such as histidine utilization, i.e. hutUHI, fatty acid catabolism and the CoA thioester intermediates (e.g. paa, echA8 and mgh) (Table S6). The hut genes are involved in the formation of formiminoglutamate and is an essential amino acid in protein synthesis [54, 55], whereas fatty acid catabolism is involved in the breakdown of LOS, the primary target for colistin [6]. We expected that the decreased expression of these genes reduced the destructive impact of colistin exposure reinforcing the cell membrane and maintaining cellular integrity.

Genes with increased expression

Differentially expressed genes between the different colR cultures (C1 and C2) grown in the presence of colistin, at 64 or 128 mg l−1, or in the absence of colistin were also compared. Genes common to all four conditions (colR +/− colistin) and not in aged colonies (control) were considered. A 2–11-fold (log2FC 1.5–5.8) increase in expression was observed in genes encoding the efflux proteins adeI, adeC, emrB, mexB/adeJ and macAB relative to the parent strain when not exposed or grown in colistin (Fig. 1, Table S6). Previous studies have also seen an increase in expression of efflux proteins adeIJK and macAB-tolC in a lpx-deficient strain in the presence of colistin [40]. In in our study, adek (BAL062_00757) and tolC (BAL062_03655) did not meet the minimum threshold (Table S8). Notably, a transcriptional regulator nemR, which is upstream of macAB and part of the TetR family, exhibited a 3–6-fold decrease in expression in the colR cultures, indicating that this efflux system may be under the control of nemR, a common feature of the TetR repressors [56]. Efflux is a collective mechanism employed by bacteria to confer resistance to multiple drugs including colistin in [57-59]. We hypothesize that along with the involvement of mla in subinhibitory concentrations in the TraDIS experiment, initial response to colistin is primarily by efflux until lipid-A synthesis is disrupted due to the ISAba1-mediated disruption of lpxC, where both resistance mechanisms may function together. Further experiments will be needed to confirm this. Other genes with increased expression included those encoding putative signal peptides BAL062_00353, BAL062_00598 and BAL062_03891, an acid shock protein (BAL062_00604), two 17 kDa surface antigens (BAL062_01389 and BAL062_01390), and a lipoprotein (BAL062_03623). These genes had a 4–17-fold increase in expression. Future work is required to elucidate the function of these genes and their role in colistin resistance/tolerance.

Conclusion

Our analysis showed that multiple mechanisms are associated with intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of colR in . Genes involved in the maintenance of cellular integrity appear to be crucial in permitting bacteria to survive in sub-inhibitory concentrations of colistin, in addition to genes involved in peptidoglycanand LOS synthesis. The colR mechanisms outlined above were mainly associated with ISAba1 or mutational changes in genes critical for cell wall synthesis or genes controlling their expression. This included the disruption of baeR, a TCS, resulting in the increased expression of efflux pumps, such as MacAB and AdeIJK. Drug efflux is an important resistance mechanism in bacteria, and has recently been identified in mediating colR in [60]. A recent study using an efflux pump inhibitor found that carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazine (CCCP) reversed and/or suppressed colR in [61]. Although this chemical compound is not suitable for clinical use, our work highlights the crucial role of MDR efflux pumps in acquired colR, which could be useful targets for future therapies to be used in combination with colistin to maintain the efficacy of this crucial last-line therapy. Our results have described the complex yet linked nature of colistin tolerance and colR, highlighting the interaction of a multitude of effectors and stress-related genes required to generate this phenotype. Sequence data (WGS and RNAseq) from this study were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive and the accession numbers may be be found in Table S2. The complete genome sequence for baumanniiGC2 1652-2 was obtained from Park JY, Kim S, Kim S-M, Cha SH, Lim S-K, et al. Complete genome sequence of multidrug resistant strain 1656-2, which forms sturdy biofilm. J Bacteriol 2011;193:6393–4.
  60 in total

1.  Combined colistin and rifampicin therapy for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: clinical outcome and adverse events.

Authors:  N Petrosillo; P Chinello; M F Proietti; L Cecchini; M Masala; C Franchi; M Venditti; S Esposito; E Nicastri
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 2.  Clinically relevant chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps in bacteria.

Authors:  Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Effects of Efflux Pump Inhibitors on Colistin Resistance in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Wentao Ni; Yanjun Li; Jie Guan; Jin Zhao; Junchang Cui; Rui Wang; Youning Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with intravenous colistin: a comparison with imipenem-susceptible VAP.

Authors:  J Garnacho-Montero; C Ortiz-Leyba; F J Jiménez-Jiménez; A E Barrero-Almodóvar; J L García-Garmendia; M Bernabeu-WittelI; S L Gallego-Lara; J Madrazo-Osuna
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Antibiograms of multidrug-resistant clinical Acinetobacter baumannii: promising therapeutic options for treatment of infection with colistin-resistant strains.

Authors:  Jian Li; Roger L Nation; Roxanne J Owen; Stephanie Wong; Denis Spelman; Clare Franklin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system.

Authors:  Mark D Adams; Gabrielle C Nickel; Saralee Bajaksouzian; Heather Lavender; A Rekha Murthy; Michael R Jacobs; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antibiotic modulation of capsular exopolysaccharide and virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Edward Geisinger; Ralph R Isberg
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Variation in the complex carbohydrate biosynthesis loci of Acinetobacter baumannii genomes.

Authors:  Johanna J Kenyon; Ruth M Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Polymyxin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: Genetic Mutations and Transcriptomic Changes in Response to Clinically Relevant Dosage Regimens.

Authors:  Soon-Ee Cheah; Matthew D Johnson; Yan Zhu; Brian T Tsuji; Alan Forrest; Jurgen B Bulitta; John D Boyce; Roger L Nation; Jian Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Evasion of Antimicrobial Activity in Acinetobacter baumannii by Target Site Modifications: An Effective Resistance Mechanism.

Authors:  Arturo Martínez-Trejo; Juan Manuel Ruiz-Ruiz; Luis Uriel Gonzalez-Avila; Andrés Saldaña-Padilla; Cecilia Hernández-Cortez; Miguel Angel Loyola-Cruz; Juan Manuel Bello-López; Graciela Castro-Escarpulli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  The StkSR Two-Component System Influences Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Sarah K Giles; Uwe H Stroeher; Bhavya Papudeshi; Robert A Edwards; Jessica Ap Carlson-Jones; Michael Roach; Melissa H Brown
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-08

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Genetic Tools for Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Ellen M E Sykes; Soumya Deo; Ayush Kumar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Combined exposure to non-antibiotic pharmaceutics and antibiotics in the gut synergistically promote the development of multi-drug-resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Danyang Shi; Han Hao; Zilin Wei; Dong Yang; Jing Yin; Haibei Li; Zhengshan Chen; Zhongwei Yang; Tianjiao Chen; Shuqing Zhou; Haiyan Wu; Junwen Li; Min Jin
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

5.  Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms.

Authors:  Diana Albertos Torres; Helena M B Seth-Smith; Nicole Joosse; Claudia Lang; Olivier Dubuis; Magdalena Nüesch-Inderbinen; Vladimira Hinic; Adrian Egli
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Genomic and phenotypic analyses of diverse non-clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strains reveals strain-specific virulence and resistance capacity.

Authors:  Mohammad Hamidian; Ram P Maharjan; Daniel N Farrugia; Natasha N Delgado; Hue Dinh; Francesca L Short; Xenia Kostoulias; Anton Y Peleg; Ian T Paulsen; Amy K Cain
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2022-02

7.  Integrative analysis of outer membrane vesicles proteomics and whole-cell transcriptome analysis of eravacycline induced Acinetobacter baumannii strains.

Authors:  DineshKumar Kesavan; Aparna Vasudevan; Liang Wu; Jianguo Chen; Zhaoliang Su; Shengjun Wang; Huaxi Xu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Genetic variation in the MacAB-TolC efflux pump influences pathogenesis of invasive Salmonella isolates from Africa.

Authors:  Jared D Honeycutt; Nicolas Wenner; Yan Li; Susan M Brewer; Liliana M Massis; Sky W Brubaker; Phoom Chairatana; Siân V Owen; Rocío Canals; Jay C D Hinton; Denise M Monack
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.823

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.