Literature DB >> 19679440

Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis using minimally invasive surgery.

Sandeep Biswal1, Roger W Brighton.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intermediate-term survivorship of cemented fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). One hundred twenty-eight consecutive UKAs in 98 patients were performed by a single surgeon with "Allegretto" UKA prostheses. Six patients died and 5 were lost to follow-up, leaving 87 patients (116 knees) with an average follow-up of 5.7 years (range, 3-8 years). At the latest follow-up, the survival rate was 92.2%; average clinical and functional knee society scores improved from 50 and 64 points preoperatively to 89 and 88 points, respectively; and average total knee score was 171 (range, 94-200). Radiographic follow-up demonstrated average alignment of 3 degrees valgus (range, 6 degrees varus to 7 degrees valgus). Ninety-two percent of the patients indicated satisfaction with the procedure. Nine knees failed requiring revision at an average of 40.4 months. We are encouraged with the satisfactory results, considering the broader spectrum of selected patients. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679440     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  High rate of implant loosening for uncemented resurfacing-type medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Iacono; Laura Bragonzoni; Mirco Lo Presti; Maria Pia Neri; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Marco Nitri; Giovanni Raspugli; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Long-term survival is similar between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with similar demographics.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Dae Kyung Bae; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty combined to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Alberto Ventura; Claudio Legnani; Clara Terzaghi; Stefano Iori; Enrico Borgo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Ibrahim Akkawi; Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Michele Gagliardi; Marco Nitri; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A novel standardized algorithm using SPECT/CT evaluating unhappy patients after unicondylar knee arthroplasty--a combined analysis of tracer uptake distribution and component position.

Authors:  Basil Suter; Enrique Testa; Patrick Stämpfli; Praveen Konala; Helmut Rasch; Niklaus F Friederich; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 7.  Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Anurag Mittal; Prashant Meshram; Woo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  The Survivorship and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Jee Hyoung Kim; Sung Won Hong; Woo Shik Jung; Won Shik Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

9.  Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: implants used and causes of failure.

Authors:  Alan de Paula Mozella; Felipe Borges Gonçalves; Jansen Osterno Vasconcelos; Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros Cobra
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 10.  Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Tjeerd Jager; Matthew S Dooley; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.