| Literature DB >> 30719440 |
Atais Bacchi1, Ricardo Armini Caldas2, Daniel Schmidt3, Mauricio Detoni3, Doglas Cecchin3, Ana Paula Farina3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ferule and the post type on the fracture strength and stress distribution in premolars.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30719440 PMCID: PMC6335778 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2196519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Mechanical properties of materials simulated in the study.
| Material | E (GPa) | Poisson ratio ( | Shear modulus (GPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dentin [ | 18 | 0.31 | |
| Polyether [ | 5 × 10−2 | 0.45 | |
| Polystyrene resin [ | 13.5 | 0.31 | |
| Composite resin [ | 15.8 | 0.24 | |
| Stainless steel [ | 19.3 | 0.3 | |
| Cu-Al alloy [ | 109 | 0.33 | |
| Nickel-chromium alloy [ | 205 | 0.33 | |
| Resin cement [ | 18.6 | 0.28 | |
| Gutta percha [ | 1.4 × 10−1 | 0.45 | |
| Glass Fiber post [ | X=37 | Xy=0.27 | Gxy=3.1 |
| Y=9.5 | Xz=0.34 | Gxz=3.5 | |
| Z=9.5 | Yz=0.27 | Gyz=3.1 |
The mean fracture strength (N), standard deviation (±SD), and failure mode for each experimental condition.
| Groups | Fracture strength (N) | Failure mode distribution | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 5 | Repairable | Irreparable | ||
| FPC - F | 1,031.93 | - | 5 | 5 | - | - | 5 | 5 |
| FPC - NF | 620.15 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| CPC - F | 1,266.57 | - | 3 | 7 | - | - | 3 | 7 |
| CPC - NF | 809.72 | - | 6 | 3 | - | 1 | 6 | 4 |
|
| ||||||||
| Main effect: | ||||||||
| Interaction effect: | ||||||||
FPC, fiber post relined with composite resin; CPC, cast post-and-core. F – Ferule; NF – no ferule. Uppercase letters represent the significance for the factor “ferule” within the same post material; lowercase letters represent significance for the factor “post material” within the same ferule condition.
Figure 1Examples of failure patterns observed in the study. (a) Type 1, cementation fracture. (b) Type 2, fracture in the cervical third. (c) Type 3, fracture in the middle third. (d) Type 4, fracture in the apical third. (e) Type 5, longitudinal fracture. (a) and (b) repairable fractures; (c), (d), and (e) irreparable fractures.
Stress results (MPa) in dentin in samples with a standard load of 300 N.
| Group | Load (N) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CPC-NF | 300 | 101 | 14 |
| CPC-F | 86 | 4 | |
| FPC-NF | 84 | 3 | |
| FPC-F | 84 | 2 |
Figure 2Representation of the σmax and σmin stress concentration in the groups with a standard load of 300 N.
Stress results (MPa) in dentin for the finite element analysis with the load of fracture strength of each group.
| Group | Load (N) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CPC-NF | 806 | 280 | 41 |
| CPC-F | 1272 | 297 | 11 |
| FPC-NF | 622 | 349 | 19 |
| FPC-F | 1032 | 248 | 7 |
Figure 3Representation of the σmax and σmin stress concentration in the groups when the load of fracture strength teste was applied.