OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fracture strength and pattern of failure of teeth with weakened roots reconstructed by different procedures. METHODS: In an in vitro study root posts were placed in 50 endodontically treated canines, divided into 5 groups (n=10) as follows: cast metallic post; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal + glass fibre strips; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal + accessory glass fibre posts; anatomical post (glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal, relined with low viscosity composite resin). Posts were luted with resin cement and the coronal portion of posts was constructed with composite resin. Metallic crowns were cemented on the posts. Specimens were submitted to compressive load in a universal testing machine. Fracture strength values of each group were compared. RESULTS: Fracture strength values were for Groups 1-5 respectively: 1087.06; 745.69; 775.41; 920.64; 876.12kgf, with significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 1 and 3 (p<0.05). Observed patterns of fracture were: Group 1 - 100% of roots fractured; Groups 2 and 4 - variable fracture modes; Group 3 - 60% of fractures occurred in the cervical root third; Group 5 - 50% of failures occurred in the coronal portion of the post. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture strength of teeth with cast metallic posts, teeth with anatomical posts or teeth with glass fibre posts combined with accessory posts was similar. All teeth restored with cast metallic posts presented fractures and were unfavourable to maintenance of the remaining tooth structure. Teeth with fibre posts (Groups 2 to 5) presented variable fracture modes; however, the maximum percentage of unfavourable fractures was 30%.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fracture strength and pattern of failure of teeth with weakened roots reconstructed by different procedures. METHODS: In an in vitro study root posts were placed in 50 endodontically treated canines, divided into 5 groups (n=10) as follows: cast metallic post; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal + glass fibre strips; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal + accessory glass fibre posts; anatomical post (glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal, relined with low viscosity composite resin). Posts were luted with resin cement and the coronal portion of posts was constructed with composite resin. Metallic crowns were cemented on the posts. Specimens were submitted to compressive load in a universal testing machine. Fracture strength values of each group were compared. RESULTS:Fracture strength values were for Groups 1-5 respectively: 1087.06; 745.69; 775.41; 920.64; 876.12kgf, with significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 1 and 3 (p<0.05). Observed patterns of fracture were: Group 1 - 100% of roots fractured; Groups 2 and 4 - variable fracture modes; Group 3 - 60% of fractures occurred in the cervical root third; Group 5 - 50% of failures occurred in the coronal portion of the post. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture strength of teeth with cast metallic posts, teeth with anatomical posts or teeth with glass fibre posts combined with accessory posts was similar. All teeth restored with cast metallic posts presented fractures and were unfavourable to maintenance of the remaining tooth structure. Teeth with fibre posts (Groups 2 to 5) presented variable fracture modes; however, the maximum percentage of unfavourable fractures was 30%.
Authors: Victor Grover Rene Clavijo; José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Reis; William Kabbach; André Luis Faria e Silva; Osmir Batista de Oliveira Junior; Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Atais Bacchi; Ricardo Armini Caldas; Daniel Schmidt; Mauricio Detoni; Doglas Cecchin; Ana Paula Farina Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Luanne Mara Rodrigues De Matos; Lucas Portela Oliveira; Aryvelto Miranda Silva; Jessica Katarine De Abreu Silva; Marcelo Lopes Silva Journal: Dent Res J (Isfahan) Date: 2020-12-10