| Literature DB >> 30719071 |
Chaofei Zhang1, Wenjun Wang1, Dennis Anderson2, Sishu Guan3, Guofa Li4, Hongyi Xiang3, Hui Zhao3, Bo Cheng1.
Abstract
Stretch reflex is an important factor that influences the biomechanical response of the human body under whole-body vibration. However, there is a lack of quantitative evaluation at lower frequencies. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of vibration on the stretch reflex and, in particular, to explore the quantitative relationship between dynamic muscle responses and low-frequency vibrations. The gastrocnemius muscle of 45 Sprague-Dawley rats was dissected. Sinusoidal vibrations of five discrete frequencies (2~16 Hz) with peak-to-peak amplitudes of 1 mm were applied to the gastrocnemius muscles with 2 mm or 3 mm prelengthening. Variables including dynamic muscle force, vibration acceleration, and displacement were recorded in two conditions, with and without the stretch reflex. Results showed that the dynamic muscle forces decreased by 20% on average for the 2 mm prelengthening group after the stretch reflex was blocked and by 24% for the 3 mm prelengthening group. Statistical analysis indicated that the amplitude of dynamic muscle force in the "with stretch reflex" condition was significantly larger than that in the "without stretch reflex" condition (p < 0.001). The tension-length curve was found to be a nonlinear hysteresis loop that changed with frequency. The phase difference between the dynamic muscle force and the length change was affected significantly by vibration frequency (p < 0.01), and the minimum frequency was 4-8 Hz. Experimental results of this study could benefit musculoskeletal model by providing a theoretical support to build a stretch reflex model for low-frequency vibration.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30719071 PMCID: PMC6335862 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1971045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Figure 1Two experimental conditions.
Figure 2Experiment configuration.
Figure 3Typical example of raw data and fitting result at 8 Hz with stretch reflex under 2 mm prelengthening condition.
Figure 4Comparison of muscle response force with/without stretch reflex for 2 mm and 3 mm prelengthening group.
Percent decrease of dynamic muscle force from WSR to WOSR condition.
| (1 − ( | 2 Hz | 4 Hz | 8 Hz | 12 Hz | 16 Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 mm prelengthening condition | 20.1% | 20.3% | 18.9% | 18.9% | 17.7% |
| 3 mm prelengthening condition | 27.2% | 25.5% | 22.7% | 21.1% | 22.6% |
Three-way ANOVA analysis result of dynamic muscle force.
| Source | df |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 2.06 | 0.1522 |
|
| 4 | 17.74 | 0.000 |
|
| 1 | 25.21 | 0.000 |
|
| 4 | 0.06 | 0.9931 |
|
| 1 | 0.61 | 0.4358 |
|
| 4 | 0.11 | 0.9782 |
Figure 5Comparison of normalized muscle response force between 2 and 3 mm prelengthening group.
Figure 6Phase difference between dynamic muscle force and length change for 2 mm and 3 mm prelengthening group.
Figure 7Representative muscle force vs. length curve (2 mm prelengthening group).
Figure 8Identification of average stiffness force and damp force of the hysteresis loops.
Figure 9Diagram of current muscle model in solid line and potential stretch reflex module in dash line.