| Literature DB >> 30718634 |
Elena Najdenovska1,2, Constantin Tuleasca3,4,5,6,7, João Jorge8,9, Philippe Maeder10, José P Marques11, Timo Roine8,10,12, Daniel Gallichan13, Jean-Philippe Thiran10,4, Marc Levivier3,5, Meritxell Bach Cuadra8,10,4.
Abstract
The ventro-intermediate nucleus (Vim), as part of the motor thalamic nuclei, is a commonly used target in functional stereotactic neurosurgery for treatment of drug-resistant tremor. As it cannot be directly visualized on routinely used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), its clinical targeting is performed using indirect methods. Recent literature suggests that the Vim can be directly visualized on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) acquired at 7 T. Our work aims to assess the distinguishable Vim on 7 T SWI in both healthy-population and patients and, using it as a reference, to compare it with: (1) The clinical targeting, (2) The automated parcellation of thalamic subparts based on 3 T diffusion MRI (dMRI), and (3) The multi-atlas segmentation techniques. In 95.2% of the data, the manual outline was adjacent to the inferior lateral border of the dMRI-based motor-nuclei group, while in 77.8% of the involved cases, its ventral part enclosed the Guiot points. Moreover, the late MRI signature in the patients was always observed in the anterior part of the manual delineation and it overlapped with the multi-atlas outline. Overall, our study provides new insight on Vim discrimination through MRI and imply novel strategies for its automated segmentation, thereby opening new perspectives for standardizing the clinical targeting.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30718634 PMCID: PMC6361927 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37825-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Illustration of the visible structures corresponding to the thalamic area in axial view on the SWI acquired at 7T, based upon the illustration from the pioneering work of Abosch et al.[21]. In panel A the SWI features are compared with the Schalterbrand atlas (plate 53 Hd + 3.5) superimposed on the right thalamus. The arrows and the respective color contours indicate the nuclei: Vim, Pulvinar (Pu), ventro-caudalus (Vc), ventro-odalis (Vo), the medio-dorsal group (MD) and the internal capsule (ic). The shown SWI image is part of the dataset used in this study. Panel B gives a corresponding axial plate of the Morel’s atlas where the (same) color (shade) matches appropriate regions of the Shalternbrand’s atlas, while keeping the same nomenclature used in each one of them. In fact, considering the Morel’s atlas[59] nomenclature, Vim is part of the Ventro-Lateral-posterior nuclei, which furthermore, together with ventro-lateral anterior and ventro-posterior nuclei form the ventral latero-ventral (VLV) group of nuclei.
Figure 2A schematic overview of the performed analysis and comparison in the presented study.
Figure 3Visual representation of the comparison between the methods. Panel a give the results in axial view of each young subject respectively (YS1-YS5), while panel b shows a 3D view of the Subject YS2’s outlined Vim, as well as its localization inside the VLV cluster and within the thalamus. Among the shown findings, the Guiot points are given in magenta, the manual Vim delineation in yellow and the automatically segmented VLV cluster in red. The remaining automatically delineated clusters shown in panel A are: Pulvinar (Pu), medio-dorsal (MD) and the anterior (A) group of nuclei as well as the cluster enclosing the centro-lateral and the lateral posterior nuclei along with the medial part of the Pulvinar (CL-LP-PuM). It can be seen that for all the subjects the Guiot points are always inside and/or on the border of the manual delineation, which furthermore is observed in the anterior-lateral part of the VLV cluster close to its lateral border.
Figure 4Illustration of the difficulties encountered for the manual delineation of the Vim regarding the image contrast on SWI acquired at 7T and the presence of blood vessels in the targeted area. We can observe that the contrast varies between subjects, but also between the two groups, young (here YS1 and YS2) versus the elderly (ES2 and ES3). The arrow for Subject YS1, illustrates the relatively big blood vessel passing through the left targeted thalamic region that prevented manual discrimination of the Vim. The presence of small vessels surrounding the Vim can be observed in each panel.
The calculated volume of the manually delineated Vim and the VLV cluster.
| Volume | Vim | VLV | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual delineation | Multi-atlas segmentation | Diffusion-based outline | ||||||||||
| Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | |||||||
| mm3 | normalized | mm3 | normalized | mm3 | normalized | mm3 | normalized | cm3 | normalized | cm3 | normalized | |
| Subject YS1 | /(*) | /(*) | 77.6 | 1% | /(**) | /(**) | /(**) | /(**) | 1.1 | 15% | 1 | 14% |
| Subject YS2 | 76.3 | 1% | 82 | 1.1% | 66.9 | 0.9% | 71.6 | 1% | 1.3 | 17% | 1.3 | 18% |
| Subject YS3 | 83.3 | 1.5% | 82.9 | 1.2% | 28.5 | 0.5% | 44.4 | 0.6% | 1.1 | 18% | 1.1 | 16% |
| Subject YS4 | 82.8 | 1.1% | 73 | 1.1% | 42.4 | 0.6% | 42.4 | 0.6% | 1 | 14% | 0.9 | 15% |
| Subject YS5 | 67.2 | 1% | 78.7 | 1% | 43 | 0.6% | 41.5 | 0.5% | 1.2 | 19% | 1 | 15% |
| Subject ES1 | 93 | 1.2% | 94.5 | 1.3% | 42.7 | 0.6% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 0.9 | 13% | 0.8 | 13% |
| Subject ES2 | 58 | 0.5% | 56.5 | 0.5% | 19.4 | 0.2% | 44.9 | 0.4% | 1.4 | 14% | 1.4 | 15% |
| Subject ES3 | 81.5 | 0.9% | 65.5 | 0.8% | 32.4 | 0.4% | 9.7 | 0.1% | 1.2 | 15% | 1 | 14% |
| Subject ES4 | 71.4 | 1.1% | 69.1 | 1% | 20.2 | 0.3% | 6.1 | 0.1% | 0.7 | 13% | 0.8 | 13% |
The presence of a blood vessel made impossible the manual delineation of the Subject YS1’s right Vim (*) and therefore this subject was not considered in the analysis of multi-atlas segmentation (**).
Figure 5Boxplot showing the difference between the six targeting points obtained by the quadrilatere of Guiot for each young healthy subject respectively.
Figure 6Visual comparison between the manual delineation and the multi-atlas outline of the Vim. The Dice coefficient estimates the overlap between the two outlines.
Figure 7Illustration of the results from tremor patients. Both patients were treated on the left thalamus, with left Vim radiosurgery for right-sided drug-resistant essential tremor.
MRI protocol. The abbreviation YS denotes the parameters used for the acquisitions from the young cohort, ES from the elderly one, and P for the patients, where they differed between them.
| Sequence | 3T T2-w | 3T T2-w CISS | 3T MPRAGE | 3T DWI | 7T MP2RAGE | 7T SWI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scanning Machine (Siemens) | YS: Tim Trio | YS: Tim Trio | YS: Tim Trio;ES,P: Prisma | YS: Tim Trio; ES,P: Prisma | Magnetom (head only) | Magnetom (head only) |
| Resolution, mm3 | YS: 0.5 × 0.5 × 1.0 | YS: 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 | 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 | 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.2 | YS1, YS2, ES2, P1, P2: 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8; Others: 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 | 0.375 × 0.375 × 1.0 |
| Axial matrix size | YS: 512 × 512 | YS: 320 × 320 | 256 × 256 | 98 × 98 | YS1, YS2, ES3, P1, P2: 240 × 256; Others: 256 × 320 | 512 × 512 |
| Slice/partitions | YS: 160 | YS: 80 | YS: 160; ES, P: 192 | YS: 52; ES, P: 62 | YS1, YS2, ES3, P1, P2: 176; Others: 320 | 72 |
| Repetition time, ms | YS: 3200 | YS: 6.18 | 2300 | YS: 6300; ES, P: 7100 | 6000 | 28 |
| Echo time, ms | YS: 402 | YS: 2.75 | YS: 2.98; ES, P: 2.03 | 84 | YS: 2.64; ES: 2.05 | 20 |
| Inversion time, ms | / | / | 900 | / | 800/2700 | / |
| Flip angles, degrees | YS: 120 | YS: 49 | 9 | 90 | 7/5 | 10 |
| Target | Whole Brain | Thalamus | Whole Brain | Whole Brain | Whole Brain | Thalamus |