P Alison Paprica1, Magda Nunes de Melo2, Michael J Schull2. 1. ICES (Paprica, Nunes de Melo, Schull), Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Paprica, Schull), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Schull), Toronto, Ont. alison.paprica@utoronto.ca. 2. ICES (Paprica, Nunes de Melo, Schull), Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Paprica, Schull), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Schull), Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both the research literature and headline news stories indicate that the public cares about how their health data are used. The objective of this study was to learn more about the general public's attitudes toward users and uses of linked administrative health data held by ICES in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Eight focus groups, with a total of 65 members of the general public, were conducted in urban and northern settings in Ontario, Canada, in 2015 and 2017 using qualitative market research panels established by a market research/public opinion research firm. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged: (a) the need for assurance about privacy and security, (b) general support for research based on linked administrative health data with some conditions and (c) mixed and more negative reaction when there is private sector involvement. Two minor themes were also derived from the data: (a) low knowledge and understanding of how linked administrative health data are used for research and (b) mixed views on the need to obtain consent when health data do not include identifying information. INTERPRETATION: The public generally supports research based on linked administrative health data, but there is no blanket approval. Researchers and organizations that hold health data should engage with members of the public to understand and address their concerns about privacy and security and to ensure that research is aligned with social licence, particularly where there is private sector involvement. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Both the research literature and headline news stories indicate that the public cares about how their health data are used. The objective of this study was to learn more about the general public's attitudes toward users and uses of linked administrative health data held by ICES in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Eight focus groups, with a total of 65 members of the general public, were conducted in urban and northern settings in Ontario, Canada, in 2015 and 2017 using qualitative market research panels established by a market research/public opinion research firm. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged: (a) the need for assurance about privacy and security, (b) general support for research based on linked administrative health data with some conditions and (c) mixed and more negative reaction when there is private sector involvement. Two minor themes were also derived from the data: (a) low knowledge and understanding of how linked administrative health data are used for research and (b) mixed views on the need to obtain consent when health data do not include identifying information. INTERPRETATION: The public generally supports research based on linked administrative health data, but there is no blanket approval. Researchers and organizations that hold health data should engage with members of the public to understand and address their concerns about privacy and security and to ensure that research is aligned with social licence, particularly where there is private sector involvement. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Muhammad Mamdani; Paula Rochon; David N Juurlink; Geoffrey M Anderson; Alex Kopp; Gary Naglie; Peter C Austin; Andreas Laupacis Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-02-24
Authors: Melissa D McCradden; Ami Baba; Ashirbani Saha; Sidra Ahmad; Kanwar Boparai; Pantea Fadaiefard; Michael D Cusimano Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-02-18
Authors: Jenine Paul; Randy Davidson; Cheryl Johnstone; Margaret Loong; John Matecsa; Astrid Guttmann; Michael J Schull Journal: Int J Popul Data Sci Date: 2020-09-30
Authors: P Alison Paprica; Eric Sutherland; Andrea Smith; Michael Brudno; Rosario G Cartagena; Monique Crichlow; Brian K Courtney; Chris Loken; Kimberlyn M McGrail; Alex Ryan; Michael J Schull; Adrian Thorogood; Carl Virtanen; Kathleen Yang Journal: Int J Popul Data Sci Date: 2020-08-24
Authors: Lisa M Lix; Shamsia Sobhan; Audray St-Jean; Jean-Marc Daigle; Anat Fisher; Oriana H Y Yu; Sophie Dell'Aniello; Nianping Hu; Shawn C Bugden; Baiju R Shah; Paul E Ronksley; Silvia Alessi-Severini; Antonios Douros; Pierre Ernst; Kristian B Filion Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-07-31 Impact factor: 2.655