Kimberly A Mc Cord1, Hannah Ewald1, Aviv Ladanie1, Matthias Briel1, Benjamin Speich1, Heiner C Bucher1, Lars G Hemkens2. 1. Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Mc Cord, Ewald, Ladanie, Briel, Speich, Bucher, Hemkens), Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel; University Medical Library (Ewald), University of Basel; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Ladanie), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Briel), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. 2. Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Mc Cord, Ewald, Ladanie, Briel, Speich, Bucher, Hemkens), Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel; University Medical Library (Ewald), University of Basel; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Ladanie), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Briel), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. lars.hemkens@usb.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) may support randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to describe the current use and costs of EHRs in RCTs, with a focus on recruitment and outcome assessment. METHODS: This descriptive study was based on a PubMed search of RCTs published since 2000 that evaluated any medical intervention with the use of EHRs. Cost information was obtained from RCT investigators who used EHR infrastructures for recruitment or outcome measurement but did not explore EHR technology itself. RESULTS: We identified 189 RCTs, most of which (153 [81.0%]) were carried out in North America and were published recently (median year 2012 [interquartile range 2009-2014]). Seventeen RCTs (9.0%) involving a median of 732 (interquartile range 73-2513) patients explored interventions not related to EHRs, including quality improvement, screening programs, and collaborative care and disease management interventions. In these trials, EHRs were used for recruitment (14 [82%]) and outcome measurement (15 [88%]). Overall, in most of the trials (158 [83.6%]), the outcome (including many of the most patient-relevant clinical outcomes, from unscheduled hospital admission to death) was measured with the use of EHRs. The per-patient cost in the 17 EHR-supported trials varied from US$44 to US$2000, and total RCT costs from US$67 750 to US$5 026 000. In the remaining 172 RCTs (91.0%), EHRs were used as a modality of intervention. INTERPRETATION: Randomized controlled trials are frequently and increasingly conducted with the use of EHRs, but mainly as part of the intervention. In some trials, EHRs were used successfully to support recruitment and outcome assessment. Costs may be reduced once the data infrastructure is established. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) may support randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to describe the current use and costs of EHRs in RCTs, with a focus on recruitment and outcome assessment. METHODS: This descriptive study was based on a PubMed search of RCTs published since 2000 that evaluated any medical intervention with the use of EHRs. Cost information was obtained from RCT investigators who used EHR infrastructures for recruitment or outcome measurement but did not explore EHR technology itself. RESULTS: We identified 189 RCTs, most of which (153 [81.0%]) were carried out in North America and were published recently (median year 2012 [interquartile range 2009-2014]). Seventeen RCTs (9.0%) involving a median of 732 (interquartile range 73-2513) patients explored interventions not related to EHRs, including quality improvement, screening programs, and collaborative care and disease management interventions. In these trials, EHRs were used for recruitment (14 [82%]) and outcome measurement (15 [88%]). Overall, in most of the trials (158 [83.6%]), the outcome (including many of the most patient-relevant clinical outcomes, from unscheduled hospital admission to death) was measured with the use of EHRs. The per-patient cost in the 17 EHR-supported trials varied from US$44 to US$2000, and total RCT costs from US$67 750 to US$5 026 000. In the remaining 172 RCTs (91.0%), EHRs were used as a modality of intervention. INTERPRETATION: Randomized controlled trials are frequently and increasingly conducted with the use of EHRs, but mainly as part of the intervention. In some trials, EHRs were used successfully to support recruitment and outcome assessment. Costs may be reduced once the data infrastructure is established. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: S J Edwards; R J Lilford; D A Braunholtz; J C Jackson; J Hewison; J Thornton Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Kathryn Corson; Melanie N Doak; Lauren Denneson; Megan Crutchfield; Geoffrey Soleck; Kathryn C Dickinson; Martha S Gerrity; Steven K Dobscha Journal: Pain Med Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Christine E Phillips; Jessica D Rothstein; Kristine Beaver; Bonnie J Sherman; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Autumn Dawn Galbreath; Richard A Krasuski; Brad Smith; Karl C Stajduhar; Michael D Kwan; Robert Ellis; Gregory L Freeman Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-11-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Susan Steel; Ellen F T Yee; Larry Massie; Ronald M Schrader; Glen H Murata Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Karen A Fitzner; Eowyn F Powell; Kathryn R McCaffrey; A Simon Pickard; June M McKoy; Julia Lindenberg; Glen T Schumock; Kenneth R Carson; M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Charles L Bennett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bonnie J Bereznicki; Gregory M Peterson; Shane L Jackson; E Haydn Walters; Kimbra D Fitzmaurice; Peter R Gee Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Paul J Karanicolas; Victor M Montori; P J Devereaux; Holger Schünemann; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Faraz S Ahmad; Iben M Ricket; Bradley G Hammill; Lisa Eskenazi; Holly R Robertson; Lesley H Curtis; Cecilia D Dobi; Saket Girotra; Kevin Haynes; Jorge R Kizer; Sunil Kripalani; Mathew T Roe; Christianne L Roumie; Russ Waitman; W Schuyler Jones; Mark G Weiner Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-05-29
Authors: César Caraballo; Rohan Khera; Philip G Jones; Carole Decker; Wade Schulz; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-06-19
Authors: Jennifer Gabbard; N M Pajewski; Kathryn E Callahan; Ajay Dharod; Kristie Foley; Keren Ferris; Adam Moses; Carl Grey; Jeff Williamson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mahrukh Imran; Linda Kwakkenbos; Stephen J McCall; Kimberly A McCord; Ole Fröbert; Lars G Hemkens; Merrick Zwarenstein; Clare Relton; Danielle B Rice; Sinéad M Langan; Eric I Benchimol; Lehana Thabane; Marion K Campbell; Margaret Sampson; David Erlinge; Helena M Verkooijen; David Moher; Isabelle Boutron; Philippe Ravaud; Jon Nicholl; Rudolf Uher; Maureen Sauvé; John Fletcher; David Torgerson; Chris Gale; Edmund Juszczak; Brett D Thombs Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kate M Mitchell; Dobromir Dimitrov; James P Hughes; Mia Moore; Eric Vittinghoff; Albert Liu; Myron S Cohen; Chris Beyrer; Deborah Donnell; Marie-Claude Boily Journal: Epidemics Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Sarah Lensen; Archie Macnair; Sharon B Love; Victoria Yorke-Edwards; Nurulamin M Noor; Meredith Martyn; Alexandra Blenkinsop; Carlos Diaz-Montana; Graham Powell; Elizabeth Williamson; James Carpenter; Matthew R Sydes Journal: Trials Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Annette E Hay; Nicole Mittmann; Michael Crump; Matthew C Cheung; Jessica Sleeth; Judy Needham; Mike Broekhoven; Marina Djurfeldt; Lois E Shepherd; Ralph M Meyer; Bingshu E Chen; Joseph L Pater Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 3.677