Literature DB >> 32466729

Computable Phenotype Implementation for a National, Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned From ADAPTABLE.

Faraz S Ahmad1, Iben M Ricket2, Bradley G Hammill3,4, Lisa Eskenazi4, Holly R Robertson4, Lesley H Curtis4, Cecilia D Dobi5, Saket Girotra6,7, Kevin Haynes8, Jorge R Kizer9,10, Sunil Kripalani11, Mathew T Roe3,4, Christianne L Roumie11, Russ Waitman12, W Schuyler Jones3,4, Mark G Weiner13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many large-scale cardiovascular clinical trials are plagued with escalating costs and low enrollment. Implementing a computable phenotype, which is a set of executable algorithms, to identify a group of clinical characteristics derivable from electronic health records or administrative claims records, is essential to successful recruitment in large-scale pragmatic clinical trials. This methods paper provides an overview of the development and implementation of a computable phenotype in ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: a Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness)-a pragmatic, randomized, open-label clinical trial testing the optimal dose of aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A multidisciplinary team developed and tested the computable phenotype to identify adults ≥18 years of age with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease without safety concerns around using aspirin and meeting trial eligibility criteria. Using the computable phenotype, investigators identified over 650 000 potentially eligible patients from the 40 participating sites from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network-a network of Clinical Data Research Networks, Patient-Powered Research Networks, and Health Plan Research Networks. Leveraging diverse recruitment methods, sites enrolled 15 076 participants from April 2016 to June 2019. During the process of developing and implementing the ADAPTABLE computable phenotype, several key lessons were learned. The accuracy and utility of a computable phenotype are dependent on the quality of the source data, which can be variable even with a common data model. Local validation and modification were required based on site factors, such as recruitment strategies, data quality, and local coding patterns. Sustained collaboration among a diverse team of researchers is needed during computable phenotype development and implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: The ADAPTABLE computable phenotype served as an efficient method to recruit patients in a multisite pragmatic clinical trial. This process of development and implementation will be informative for future large-scale, pragmatic clinical trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02697916.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aspirin; electronic health records; heart disease; patient selection; pragmatic clinical trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 32466729      PMCID: PMC7321832          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  32 in total

Review 1.  Rescuing clinical trials in the United States and beyond: a call for action.

Authors:  Zubin J Eapen; John P Vavalle; Christopher B Granger; Robert A Harrington; Eric D Peterson; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Electronic health records based phenotyping in next-generation clinical trials: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; W Ed Hammond; Meredith Nahm; Douglas Wixted; Gregory E Simon; Jennifer G Robinson; Alan E Bauck; Denise Cifelli; Michelle M Smerek; John Dickerson; Reesa L Laws; Rosemary A Madigan; Shelley A Rusincovitch; Cynthia Kluchar; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Pragmatic (trial) informatics: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; Beverly B Green; Reesa Laws; Jon Puro; Michael G Kahn; Alan Bauck; Michelle Smerek; Erik G Van Eaton; Meredith Zozus; W Ed Hammond; Kari A Stephens; Greg E Simon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Defining and measuring completeness of electronic health records for secondary use.

Authors:  Nicole G Weiskopf; George Hripcsak; Sushmita Swaminathan; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Aziz A Boxwala; Mor Peleg; Samson Tu; Omolola Ogunyemi; Qing T Zeng; Dongwen Wang; Vimla L Patel; Robert A Greenes; Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  William R Hersh; Mark G Weiner; Peter J Embi; Judith R Logan; Philip R O Payne; Elmer V Bernstam; Harold P Lehmann; George Hripcsak; Timothy H Hartzog; James J Cimino; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.

Authors:  Nicole Gray Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; David J Albers
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Design and outcomes of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute coronary heart disease cohort study.

Authors:  Christianne L Roumie; Niral J Patel; Daniel Muñoz; Justin Bachmann; Ashton Stahl; Ryan Case; Cardella Leak; Russell Rothman; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-03-09

10.  Validation of a claims-based algorithm identifying eligible study subjects in the ADAPTABLE pragmatic clinical trial.

Authors:  Ezra Fishman; John Barron; Jade Dinh; W Schuyler Jones; Amanda Marshall; Rebecca Merkh; Holly Robertson; Kevin Haynes
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-11-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Innovation in the design of large-scale hybrid randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Pamela M Rist; Howard D Sesso; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  An informatics consult approach for generating clinical evidence for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Alvina G Lai; Wai Hoong Chang; Constantinos A Parisinos; Michail Katsoulis; Ruth M Blackburn; Anoop D Shah; Vincent Nguyen; Spiros Denaxas; George Davey Smith; Tom R Gaunt; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Murray P Cox; Donall Forde; Folkert W Asselbergs; Steve Harris; Sylvia Richardson; Reecha Sofat; Richard J B Dobson; Aroon Hingorani; Riyaz Patel; Jonathan Sterne; Amitava Banerjee; Alastair K Denniston; Simon Ball; Neil J Sebire; Nigam H Shah; Graham R Foster; Bryan Williams; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.