| Literature DB >> 30717704 |
Lisa König1, Fabian D Mairinger2, Oliver Hoffmann3, Ann-Kathrin Bittner3, Kurt W Schmid2, Rainer Kimmig3, Sabine Kasimir-Bauer3, Agnes Bankfalvi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are described as an important immune modulator in the tumor microenvironment and are associated with breast cancer (BC) outcome. The spatial analysis of TILs and TIL subtype distribution at the invasive tumor front (ITF) and the tumor center (TC) might provide further insights into tumor progression.Entities:
Keywords: B cells; Breast cancer; Disseminated tumor cells; Minimal residual disease; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; T cells; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30717704 PMCID: PMC6360695 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5320-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient and tumor characteristics
| Total | 87 |
| Age | 53 years (range: 28–83) |
| Menopausal status | |
| pre-menopausal | 43 (50%) |
| peri-menopausal | 6 (7%) |
| post-menopausal | 38 (44%) |
| T stadium pre-NACT | |
| cT1a-cT1c | 20 (23%) |
| cT2 | 51 (59%) |
| >cT2 | 14 (16%) |
| Unknown | 2 (2%) |
| T stadium post-NACT | |
| ypT0, ypTis | 18 (21%) |
| ypT1a | 11 (13%) |
| ypT1b, ypT1c | 18 (21%) |
| ypT2 | 26 (30%) |
| >ypT2 | 10 (12%) |
| Unknown | 4 (5%) |
| N stadium pre-NACT | |
| cN0 | 41 (47%) |
| cN1 | 40 (46%) |
| cN2, cN3 | 5 (6%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1%) |
| N stadium post-NACT | |
| yN0 | 47 (54%) |
| yN1 | 29 (33%) |
| yN2/N3 | 8 (9%) |
| Unknown | 3 (4%) |
| Tumor type | |
| Ductal invasive | 60 (69%) |
| Lobular invasive | 11 (13%) |
| Other | 14 (16%) |
| Unknown | 2 (2%) |
| Tumor grade | |
| G1 | 4 (5%) |
| G2 | 40 (46%) |
| G3 | 42 (48%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1%) |
| Estrogen receptor (IHC)a | |
| Positive | 68 (78%) |
| Negative | 19 (22%) |
| Progesterone receptor (IHC)a | |
| Positive | 58 (67%) |
| Negative | 29 (33%) |
| HER2 a | |
| Positive | 23 (26%) |
| Negative | 64 (74%) |
| Tumor subtype | |
| ER-, PR-, HER2- | 14 (16%) |
| ER-, PR-, HER2+ | 4 (5%) |
| ER+/PR+, HER2- | 50 (58%) |
| ER+, PR+, HER2+ | 19 (22%) |
| NACT regimen | |
| CTX | 53 (61%) |
| CTX + Trastuzumab | 14 (16%) |
| CTX + Avastin | 4 (5%) |
| CTX + Lapatinib + Trastuzumab | 6 (7%) |
| HTX | 9 (10%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1%) |
| Trastuzumab treatment | |
| Yes | 20 (23%) |
| No | 66 (76%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1%) |
| Clinical response | |
| pCR | 15 (17%) |
| pPR | 62 (71%) |
| pNC | 6 (7%) |
| Unknown | 4 (5%) |
| Histological tumor regression gradeb | |
| 0 | 6 (7%) |
| 1 | 32 (37%) |
| 2 | 22 (25%) |
| 3 | 5 (6%) |
| 4 | 12 (14%) |
| Unknown | 10 (12%) |
| Local treatment | |
| Mastectomy | 56 (64%) |
| Breast conservation surgery | 26 (30%) |
| Unknown | 5 (6%) |
| DTC positive | |
| pre-NACT | 16 (18%) |
| post-NACT | 13 (15%) |
aPositive ER and PR status (ER+, PR+) was defined based on the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [88] and concordant German recommendations at that time. Accordingly, we used a cut off value of 1% for ER and PR status. Breast cancers were defined as HER2-positive (HER2+) only for those cases that were + 3 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (cut off 30%) or + 2 on IHC and confirmed positive by CISH [89]. Respective results were not re-defined because they served as a basis for therapy decision at baseline
b[48]
Fig. 1Representative H&E and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Images show represenative H&E (A) and IHC staining for CD3 (B) at the ITF (a-c) and in the TC (d-f) for each category (a/d = Low, b/e = Moderate, c/f = High)
Fig. 2Distribution of TILs and TIL subtypes through the whole tumor. These radar plots show the number of breast carcinomas being infiltrated by the different TIL infiltration categories. TIL-poor tumors were defined as BCs with low level infiltration or complete lack of TILs both at the ITF and in the TC. TIL-rich tumors had a moderate or high level of immune cell infiltration at both intratumoral areas. a High levels of total TILs were mainly observed at the ITF, whereas the TC contained generally less immune cells. The ITF was most frequently interspearsed with CD3+ T lymphocytes, CD20+ B cells and CD8+ T cells. CD68+ macrophages and and CD4+ T cells cells were found in lower amounts at the ITF. b In the TC, CD3+ T cells were found to be the prevalent subtype, whereas low amounts of CD20+, CD68+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were present, or there was no immune infiltration in the TC at all. The TIL infiltration is depicted by the number of tumors showing the certain infiltration densities
Correlation between TIL subtype infiltration at the TC and the ITF
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.2508 (0.32) | ||||||
|
| 1 (0.23) | ||||||
|
| 1 (−0.02) | 1 (0.26) | |||||
|
| 0.2508 (0.32) | 1 (0.23) | 1 (−0.02) | 0.3366 (0.32) | 1 (0.01) | ||
|
| 1 (0.26) | 0.3366 (0.32) | |||||
|
| 1 (0.01) | ||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||
|
| 1 (0.1) | ||||||
|
| 1 (−0.02) | 1 (0.21) | |||||
|
| 1 (0.1) | 1 (−0.02) | 0.099 (0.34) | 1 (0.1) | |||
|
| 1 (0.21) | 0.099 (0.34) | 0.0568 (0.36) | ||||
|
| 1 (0.1) | 0.0568 (0.36) | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.924 (0.27) | 0.1254 (0.35) | |||||
|
| 1 (0.08) | ||||||
|
| 1 (0.12) | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.23) | 1 (−0.19) | 1 (0.08) | 1 (0.08) | |
|
| 1 (0.22) | 1 (0.23) | 1 (0.03) | 0.0653 (0.37) | 1 (0.03) | ||
|
| 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.16) | 1 (0.05) | 1 (0.25) | 1 (0.12) | ||
|
| 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.24) | 0.495 (0.30) | 1 (−0.09) | 1 (0.21) | 1 (0.2) | |
Bonferroni adjusted p-values (rho)
(A) ITF-ITF, (B) TC-TC and (C) ITF-TC. Results are given as Bonferroni adjusted p-values (rho). All bold values are significant p-values with "rho" in brackets
Association of TILs and TIL subtypes with clinicopathological characteristics
| p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical parameter | TIL subtype | ITF | TC |
| Tumor grade | TILs | 0.047a | 0.047a |
| CD3 | 0.0407a | ||
| cT stadium (pre-NACT) | TILs | 0.004d | |
| CD3 | 0.004d | ||
| CD4 | 0.0118b | ||
| ypT stadium (post-NACT) | TILs | 0.0069c | 0.0014c |
| CD3 | 0.0010c | 0.0069c | |
| CD4 | 0.0014c | ||
| CD8 | 0.0197c | ||
| CD20 | 0.0151c | ||
| IS CD3/CD8 | 0.0254c | ||
| IS CD3/CD20 | 0.0144c | ||
| clinical response | TILs | 0.0204b | |
| CD3 | 0.0235b | ||
| histological regression grade | TILs | 0.0007c | |
| CD3 | 0.0308c | 0.0002c | |
| CD4 | 0.037c | ||
| CD8 | 0.0308c | 0.0008c | |
| CD20 | 0.023c | 0.0196c | |
| IS CD3/CD8 | 0.0093c | ||
| IS CD3/CD20 | 0.0481c | ||
| DTC presence post-NACT | CD4 | 0.0296c | |
High amounts of total TILs and CD3+ T cells at the ITF were associated with smaller tumor sizes post-NACT. Comparable results were observed for both immune infiltrates in the TC. The tumor grading was directly correlated with the amount of total TILs both at the ITF and in the TC as well as with the level of CD3+ cells at the ITF. Favourable NACT responses, evaluated by pathological response rate and histological regression grade, were directly associated with significantly higher amounts of total TILs and CD3+ cells present in the TC. Elevated amounts of CD4+ cells in the TC were associated with DTC presence post-NACT
aLM
bKruskal-Wallis test
cSpearman
dWilcoxon rank sum test