Literature DB >> 30713067

Long-term results of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder prosthesis.

David Bassens1, Thomas Decock1, Alexander Van Tongel2, Lieven De Wilde1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become the standard treatment for cuff tear arthropathy and complex fractures of the proximal humerus. The Delta Xtend prosthesis (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) was launched in 2006 and has shown good short-term results. Longer-term results are not yet available.
METHODS: There were 126 primary Delta Xtend prostheses implanted in our center by 1 surgeon from October 2006 until December 2009. Of these, 38 patients died, 12 were lost to follow-up, and 2 needed early revision of the prosthesis. Follow-up of at least 8 years was available for 74 patients. At preoperative and postoperative visits, shoulder function and pain were evaluated using the age- and sex-adjusted Constant-Murley score (aCS). The satisfaction rate was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up in our population was 113.1 months. The mean aCS was 44.6% (standard deviation [SD], 19.2) preoperatively. It increased significantly (P < .001) after surgery to 75.8% (SD, 12.5) at 3 months and 91.1% (SD, 11.8) at 5 years. At the latest follow-up, the mean aCS was only 79.9% (SD, 17.7), which was significantly lower (P = .002) than the aCS at 5 years postoperatively. An overall survival rate of more than 97% was seen at 8 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the promising short-term results of the Delta Xtend prosthesis can be extended in the longer-term. However, further follow-up will be necessary to check whether the statistically significant decrease in the Constant-Murley score at latest follow-up, which was driven by a decrease in range of motion and power, continues or not.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delta Xtend; Shoulder; cuff tear arthropathy; long-term results; reverse arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30713067     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Bony increased-offset reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an eccentric glenosphere and an onlay 135° humeral component: clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Philippe Collotte; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Thais Dutra Vieira; Gilles Walch
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-01-28

2.  Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased symptomatic acromial and scapular spine stress fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matt Miller; Peter N Chalmers; Jacob Nyfeler; Luke Mhyre; Cade Wheelwright; Kristin Konery; Jun Kawakami; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  A Comparison of Central Screw versus Post for Glenoid Baseplate Fixation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Lateralized Glenoid Design.

Authors:  Michael J Bercik; Brian C Werner; Benjamin W Sears; Reuben Gobezie; Evan Lederman; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Infraspinatus and deltoid length and patient height: implications for lateralization and distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Spencer R Lindsay; Weston Smith; Jun Kawakami; Ryan Hill; Robert Z Tashjian; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.019

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.