Literature DB >> 30713060

Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis.

Richard N Puzzitiello1, Anirudh K Gowd1, Joseph N Liu1, Avinesh Agarwalla1, Nikhil N Verma1, Brian Forsythe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to establish thresholds for improvement in patient-reported outcome scores that signify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) after biceps tenodesis (BT) and to assess patient variables that are associated with these clinically important outcomes.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained institutional shoulder registry was queried for patients undergoing isolated BT between 2014 and 2017. Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to calculate the MCID whereas an anchor-based method was used to calculate the SCB and PASS for the Constant-Murley score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.
RESULTS: A total of 123 patients who underwent isolated BT were included for analysis. The MCID, SCB, and PASS calculated for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were 11.0, 16.8, and 59.6, respectively. For the Constant-Murley score, the calculated MCID and PASS were 3.8 and 19.5, respectively. The MCID, SCB, and PASS calculated for the SANE score were 3.5, 5.8, and 65.5, respectively. The following patient variables were significantly associated with decreased odds of achieving the MCID: workers' compensation status, male sex, and higher preoperative SANE score. Patients with a history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery had significantly reduced odds of achieving SCB. The only factor significantly associated with failing to reach the PASS was workers' compensation status.
CONCLUSION: This study established values for the MCID, SCB, and PASS after BT without concomitant rotator cuff repair. Workers' compensation status, previous shoulder surgery, male sex, and higher preoperative patient-reported outcome measure scores are associated with lower odds of achieving clinically significant improvement after BT.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biceps tenodesis; clinical significance; minimal clinically important difference; patient acceptable symptomatic state; shoulder; substantial clinical benefit; value

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30713060     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  Early Versus Delayed Active Range of Motion After Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.

Authors:  Laura E Keeling; Austin M Looney; Andrew J Curley; Cooper B Ehlers; Alexandra M Galel; Youssef M Khalafallah; Tarun K Vippa; Brandon J Bryant; Edward S Chang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-25

Review 2.  Tenotomy or Tenodesis for Tendinopathy of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bauke Kooistra; Navin Gurnani; Alexander Weening; Derek van Deurzen; Michel van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-03

3.  Short-Term Clinical and Return-to-Work Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Onlay Biceps Tenodesis With a Single Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Brandon C Cabarcas; Alexander Beletsky; Joseph Liu; Anirudh K Gowd; Brandon J Manderle; Matthew Cohn; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-29

4.  The Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Justin M Walsh; Hailey P Huddleston; Mohamad M Alzein; Stephanie E Wong; Brian Forsythe; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-05

5.  Return to Work Following Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis and Pain.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Joseph N Liu; Hao-Hua Wu; Irene L Kalbian; Grant H Garcia; Beth E Shubin Stein
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients With Rotator Cuff Retear.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Ha-Sol Yang; Myung Jin Shin; Jeong Hee Park; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; Dongjun Park; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-02

7.  Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis Improves Outcomes for SLAP Repair: Minimum 2-Year Clinical Outcomes after SLAP II-IV Repair Versus Tenodesis Versus Both.

Authors:  T J Ridley; Marilee P Horan; Philip-C Nolte; Bryant P Elrick; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-23

8.  Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of PROMIS upper extremity after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dan Gordon; Yaniv Pines; Erel Ben-Ari; Rokito As; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman; Mandeep S Virk
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Quantifying the minimal and substantial clinical benefit of the Constant-Murley score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score in patients with calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Jan K G Louwerens; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Barend J van Royen; Denise Eygendaal; Arthur van Noort; Inger N Sierevelt
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-06

Review 10.  Outcomes and Complications After Primary Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior Tears or Biceps Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zi Jun Deng; Clark Yin; Joseph Cusano; Hussein Abdul-Rassoul; Emily J Curry; David Novikov; Richard Ma; Xinning Li
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.