BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the effect of early active elbow range of motion (ROM) protocols on failure rates and outcomes after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that patients managed using an early active ROM protocol after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis would demonstrate similar failure rates and functional outcomes compared to patients managed using a traditional delayed active ROM protocol. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We evaluated 63 patients who underwent open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation. Based on surgeon preference, 22 patients were managed using an early active motion protocol consisting of no restrictions on elbow flexion or forearm supination, while 41 patients were managed using a delayed motion protocol postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included failure of biceps tenodesis and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Secondary outcomes included shoulder and elbow ROM at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean follow-up for the 63 patients was 24.2 months postoperatively. One patient (2.4%) in the delayed active motion cohort and no patients in the early active motion cohort experienced failure. Final outcome scores as well as 6-month shoulder and elbow ROM indicated excellent functional outcomes, with no significant difference between motion cohorts. The median postoperative ASES scores were 97.99 in the early active motion cohort (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 95.49 ± 7.68) and 95.42 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 90.93 ± 16.08), while median postoperative SANE scores were 96 in the early motion cohort (mean ± SD, 94.23 ± 6.68) and 95 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 88.39 ± 17.98). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in outcome scores based on the performance of concomitant rotator cuff repair or hand dominance. CONCLUSION: Early active ROM after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation resulted in low failure rates and excellent clinical outcomes, comparable to the results of patients managed using delayed active ROM protocols. This suggests that patients undergoing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be managed using either early or delayed active motion protocols without compromising functional outcome.
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the effect of early active elbow range of motion (ROM) protocols on failure rates and outcomes after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that patients managed using an early active ROM protocol after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis would demonstrate similar failure rates and functional outcomes compared to patients managed using a traditional delayed active ROM protocol. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We evaluated 63 patients who underwent open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation. Based on surgeon preference, 22 patients were managed using an early active motion protocol consisting of no restrictions on elbow flexion or forearm supination, while 41 patients were managed using a delayed motion protocol postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included failure of biceps tenodesis and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Secondary outcomes included shoulder and elbow ROM at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean follow-up for the 63 patients was 24.2 months postoperatively. One patient (2.4%) in the delayed active motion cohort and no patients in the early active motion cohort experienced failure. Final outcome scores as well as 6-month shoulder and elbow ROM indicated excellent functional outcomes, with no significant difference between motion cohorts. The median postoperative ASES scores were 97.99 in the early active motion cohort (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 95.49 ± 7.68) and 95.42 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 90.93 ± 16.08), while median postoperative SANE scores were 96 in the early motion cohort (mean ± SD, 94.23 ± 6.68) and 95 in the delayed motion cohort (mean ± SD, 88.39 ± 17.98). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in outcome scores based on the performance of concomitant rotator cuff repair or hand dominance. CONCLUSION: Early active ROM after open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button fixation resulted in low failure rates and excellent clinical outcomes, comparable to the results of patients managed using delayed active ROM protocols. This suggests that patients undergoing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be managed using either early or delayed active motion protocols without compromising functional outcome.
Authors: S Raymond Golish; Paul E Caldwell; Mark D Miller; Naveen Singanamala; Anil S Ranawat; Gehron Treme; Sara E Pearson; Ryan Costic; Jon K Sekiya Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Michael J Creech; Marco Yeung; Matthew Denkers; Nicole Simunovic; George S Athwal; Olufemi R Ayeni Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-11-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Arne Buchholz; Frank Martetschläger; Sebastian Siebenlist; Gunther H Sandmann; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Andreas Lenich; Peter J Millett; Ulrich Stöckle; Florian Elser Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Evan E Vellios; Alireza K Nazemi; Michael G Yeranosian; Jeremiah R Cohen; Jeffrey C Wang; David R McAllister; Frank A Petrigliano Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Stephen F Brockmeier; James E Voos; Riley J Williams; David W Altchek; Frank A Cordasco; Answorth A Allen Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Frank McCormick; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Dan Solomon; Christopher Dewing; Petar Golijanin; Daniel J Gross; Matthew T Provencher Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 6.202