Literature DB >> 30710143

A minimally important treatment effect is a key but illusive concept.

L A Harvey1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30710143     DOI： 10.1038/s41393-019-0241-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN： 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain.

Authors:  Manuela L Ferreira; Robert D Herbert; Paulo H Ferreira; Jane Latimer; Raymond W Ostelo; Dafne P Nascimento; Rob J Smeets
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods.

Authors:  Madeleine T King
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; J Singer; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-12

5.  Sufficiently important difference: expanding the framework of clinical significance.

Authors:  Bruce Barrett; David Brown; Marlon Mundt; Roger Brown
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Using benefit harm tradeoffs to estimate sufficiently important difference: the case of the common cold.

Authors:  Bruce Barrett; Roger Brown; Marlon Mundt; Leota Dye; Jennifer Alt; Nasia Safdar; Rob Maberry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  X Wu; J Liu; L G Tanadini; D P Lammertse; A R Blight; John L K Kramer; G Scivoletto; L Jones; S Kirshblum; R Abel; J Fawcett; E Field-Fote; J Guest; B Levinson; D Maier; K Tansey; N Weidner; W G Tetzlaff; T Hothorn; A Curt; J D Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Jan L Brozek; Gordon H Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.186
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Treatment burden.

Authors:  Lisa A Harvey; Gunilla M Åhrén
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Physiotherapy interventions for the treatment of spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Ferreira de Araujo Barbosa; Joanne V Glinsky; Emerson Fachin-Martins; Lisa A Harvey
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.772
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.