Literature DB >> 20399609

The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference.

Henrica C W de Vet, Caroline B Terwee.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20399609     DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


× No keyword cloud information.
  27 in total

1.  A minimally important treatment effect is a key but illusive concept.

Authors:  L A Harvey
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores.

Authors:  Soili Alanne; Risto P Roine; Pirjo Räsänen; Tarja Vainiola; Harri Sintonen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Responsiveness of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing motor and cognitive rehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Emilia Ambrosini; Barbara Rocca; Calogero Foti; Simona Ferrante
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Minimum clinically important difference in outcome scores among patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  So Kato; Yasushi Oshima; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Yuki Taniguchi; Sakae Tanaka; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Inter-Day Test-Retest Reproducibility of the CAT, CCQ, HADS and EQ-5D-3L in Patients with Severe and Very Severe COPD.

Authors:  Henrik Hansen; Nina Beyer; Anne Frølich; Nina Godtfredsen; Theresa Bieler
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2021-06-01

7.  Reliability and validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ida Svege; Elin Kolle; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Benjamin Haldorsen; Ida Svege; Yngve Roe; Astrid Bergland
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Development and reliability of a clinician-rated instrument to evaluate function in individuals with shoulder pain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yngve Roe; Benjamin Haldorsen; Ida Svege; Astrid Bergland
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2013-05-28

Review 10.  Minimal clinically important difference in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Mohleen Kang; Lucian Marts; Jordan A Kempker; Srihari Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.