Everardo D Saad1, Pierre Squifflet2, Tomasz Burzykowski3, Emmanuel Quinaux2, Suzette Delaloge4, Dimitris Mavroudis5, Edith Perez6, Martine Piccart-Gebhart7, Bryan P Schneider8, Dennis Slamon9, Norman Wolmark10, Marc Buyse11. 1. International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Electronic address: everardo.saad@iddi.com. 2. International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 3. International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium. 4. Unicancer Breast Group, Paris, France. 5. University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece. 6. Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 7. Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 8. Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 9. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA. 10. NRG Oncology/Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 11. Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium; International Drug Development Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although frequently used as a primary endpoint, disease-free survival has not been validated as a surrogate for overall survival in early breast cancer. We investigated this surrogacy in the adjuvant setting of treatment with anti-HER2 antibodies. METHODS: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified published and non-published randomised controlled trials with completed accrual and available disease-free survival and overall survival results for the intention-to-treat population as of September 2016. Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), clinical trial registries (Clinicaltrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and PharmNet.Bund), and trial registries from relevant pharmaceutical companies were searched. Eligibility for treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer required at least one group to have an anti-HER antibody treatment (ie, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or trastuzumab emtansine) planned for 12 months, and at least one control arm with chemotherapy without the antibody, a lower total dose or duration of the antibody, or observation alone. Units of analysis were contrasts: two-group trials gave rise to one contrast, whereas trials with more than two groups gave rise to more than one contrast. We excluded trials enrolling patients with recurrent, metastatic, or non-invasive disease, and those testing neoadjuvant therapy exclusively. Our primary objective was to estimate patient-level and trial-level correlations between disease-free survival and overall survival. We measured the association between disease-free survival and overall survival using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs), and the association between hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival and overall survival using R2. We computed the surrogate threshold effect, the maximum HR for disease-free survival that statistically predicts an HR for overall survival less than 1·00 in a future trial. FINDINGS: Eight trials (n=21 480 patients) gave rise to a full set (12 contrasts). Patient-level associations between disease-free and overall survival were strong (rs=0·90 [95% CI 0·89-0·90]). Trial-level associations gave rise to values of R2 of 0·75 (95% CI 0·50-1·00) for the full set. Subgroups defined by nodal status and hormone receptor status yielded qualitatively similar results. Depending on the expected number of deaths in a future trial, the surrogate threshold effects ranged from 0·56 to 0·81, based on the full set. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that it is appropriate to continue to use disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in trials in HER-2-positive, early breast cancer. The key limitation of this study is the dependence of its results on the trials included and on the existence of an outlying trial. FUNDING: Roche Pharma AG.
BACKGROUND: Although frequently used as a primary endpoint, disease-free survival has not been validated as a surrogate for overall survival in early breast cancer. We investigated this surrogacy in the adjuvant setting of treatment with anti-HER2 antibodies. METHODS: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified published and non-published randomised controlled trials with completed accrual and available disease-free survival and overall survival results for the intention-to-treat population as of September 2016. Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), clinical trial registries (Clinicaltrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and PharmNet.Bund), and trial registries from relevant pharmaceutical companies were searched. Eligibility for treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer required at least one group to have an anti-HER antibody treatment (ie, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or trastuzumab emtansine) planned for 12 months, and at least one control arm with chemotherapy without the antibody, a lower total dose or duration of the antibody, or observation alone. Units of analysis were contrasts: two-group trials gave rise to one contrast, whereas trials with more than two groups gave rise to more than one contrast. We excluded trials enrolling patients with recurrent, metastatic, or non-invasive disease, and those testing neoadjuvant therapy exclusively. Our primary objective was to estimate patient-level and trial-level correlations between disease-free survival and overall survival. We measured the association between disease-free survival and overall survival using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs), and the association between hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival and overall survival using R2. We computed the surrogate threshold effect, the maximum HR for disease-free survival that statistically predicts an HR for overall survival less than 1·00 in a future trial. FINDINGS: Eight trials (n=21 480 patients) gave rise to a full set (12 contrasts). Patient-level associations between disease-free and overall survival were strong (rs=0·90 [95% CI 0·89-0·90]). Trial-level associations gave rise to values of R2 of 0·75 (95% CI 0·50-1·00) for the full set. Subgroups defined by nodal status and hormone receptor status yielded qualitatively similar results. Depending on the expected number of deaths in a future trial, the surrogate threshold effects ranged from 0·56 to 0·81, based on the full set. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that it is appropriate to continue to use disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in trials in HER-2-positive, early breast cancer. The key limitation of this study is the dependence of its results on the trials included and on the existence of an outlying trial. FUNDING: Roche Pharma AG.
Authors: D Mavroudis; E Saloustros; N Malamos; S Kakolyris; I Boukovinas; P Papakotoulas; N Kentepozidis; N Ziras; V Georgoulias Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: David Cameron; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Richard D Gelber; Marion Procter; Aron Goldhirsch; Evandro de Azambuja; Gilberto Castro; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Nedal Al-Sakaff; Sabine Lauer; Eleanor McFadden; Brian Leyland-Jones; Richard Bell; Mitch Dowsett; Christian Jackisch Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gunter von Minckwitz; Marion Procter; Evandro de Azambuja; Dimitrios Zardavas; Mark Benyunes; Giuseppe Viale; Thomas Suter; Amal Arahmani; Nathalie Rouchet; Emma Clark; Adam Knott; Istvan Lang; Christelle Levy; Denise A Yardley; Jose Bines; Richard D Gelber; Martine Piccart; Jose Baselga Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Eileen Holmes; José Baselga; Evandro de Azambuja; Amylou C Dueck; Giuseppe Viale; Jo Anne Zujewski; Aron Goldhirsch; Alison Armour; Kathleen I Pritchard; Ann E McCullough; Stella Dolci; Eleanor McFadden; Andrew P Holmes; Liu Tonghua; Holger Eidtmann; Phuong Dinh; Serena Di Cosimo; Nadia Harbeck; Sergei Tjulandin; Young-Hyuck Im; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Véronique Diéras; David W Hillman; Antonio C Wolff; Christian Jackisch; Istvan Lang; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Frances Boyle; Binghe Xu; Henry Gomez; Thomas Suter; Richard D Gelber; Edith A Perez Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Koji Oba; Xavier Paoletti; Steven Alberts; Yung-Jue Bang; Jacqueline Benedetti; Harry Bleiberg; Paul Catalano; Florian Lordick; Stefan Michiels; Satoshi Morita; Yasuo Ohashi; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Philippe Rougier; Mitsuru Sasako; Junichi Sakamoto; Daniel Sargent; Kohei Shitara; Eric Van Cutsem; Marc Buyse; Tomasz Burzykowski Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Audrey Mauguen; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Sarah Burdett; Caroline Domerg; David Fisher; Rebecca Paulus; Samithra J Mandrekar; Chandra P Belani; Frances A Shepherd; Tim Eisen; Herbert Pang; Laurence Collette; William T Sause; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Jeffrey Crawford; Mary O'Brien; Steven E Schild; Mahesh Parmar; Jayne F Tierney; Cécile Le Pechoux; Stefan Michiels Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Fausto Petrelli; Michele Ghidini; Antonio Costanzo; Valentina Rampulla; Antonio Varricchio; Gianluca Tomasello Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-04
Authors: Paul Stewart; Phillip Blanchette; Prakesh S Shah; Xiang Y Ye; R Gabriel Boldt; Ricardo Fernandes; Ted Vandenberg; Jacques Raphael Journal: Breast Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 4.380