Literature DB >> 30708093

Anatomical reference marks, evaluation parameters and reproducibility of surface topography for evaluating the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite Navarro1, Bruna Nichele da Rosa2, Cláudia Tarragô Candotti3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surface topography is a radiation-free examination that provides relevant information for the evaluation of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). However, its usage is not standardized, which restricts the applicability of this instrument. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: (a) To identify the anatomical reference markers used on surface topography; (b) to identify the parameters used on surface topography; and (c) to pool correlation and reproducibility results.
METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted following MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. The methodological quality was assessed according to Brink & Louw appraisal tool.
RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included for the qualitative synthesis. The most commonly used anatomical reference markers were: the prominent vertebra (C7 or T1), the posterior superior iliac spines (PSISs) and the sacrum (S1). The parameters for the evaluation of the AIS by surface topography are: spinal inclination angle (analogous to Cobb), gibbosity, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, pelvic obliquity, spine length, apex of the curve, C7-S1 distance (frontal plane), and C7-S1 displacement (sagittal plane). Data from eleven studies were metanalyzed and evidenced the correlation of the surface topography with X-ray exams and the reproducibility of the surface topography in the sagittal and frontal planes. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this study recommend the use of a protocol for the application of the equipment. The analyzed studies predict the use of only four markers for anatomical reference. The evaluation of the AIS can be carried out observing nine parameters. Surface topography correlates with radiography when the spinal inclination angle (Cobb angle), thoracic kyphosis angle and lumbar lordosis angle are compared. Also, surface topography presents inter and intra-rater reproducibility in the sagittal plane and intra-rater reproducibility in the frontal plane.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiography; Reproducibility; Scoliosis; Topography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30708093     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative imaging of the spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: shifting the paradigm from diagnostic to comprehensive prognostic evaluation.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Chamith R Rajapaske; Ravinder Reddy; Bassel Diebo; Patrick Knott; Brandon C Jones; Dushyant Kumar; Winnie Zhu; Edmond Lou; Nadav Shapira; Peter Noel; Victor Ho-Fung; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-31

2.  Reliability of the DIERS Formetric 4D Spine Shape Parameters in Adults without Postural Deformities.

Authors:  Brian F Degenhardt; Zane Starks; Shalini Bhatia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Moiré topography as a screening and diagnostic tool-A systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Kinga Labecka; Magdalena Plandowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy Tin-Yan Lee; Kelly Ka-Lee Lai; Jack Chun-Yiu Cheng; René Marten Castelein; Tsz-Ping Lam; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Decreased Vertical Trunk Inclination Angle and Pelvic Inclination as the Result of Mid-High-Heeled Footwear on Static Posture Parameters in Asymptomatic Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jakub Michoński; Marcin Witkowski; Bożena Glinkowska; Robert Sitnik; Wojciech Glinkowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.