Literature DB >> 30706187

Effectiveness of progestin-based therapy for morbidly obese women with complex atypical hyperplasia.

Marcia A Ciccone1, Stephanie A Whitman2, Charlotte L Conturie2, Niquelle Brown3, Christina E Dancz2, Begum Özel2, Koji Matsuo4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While progestins can effectively treat women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), the impact of body habitus on treatment outcome is not well studied. We examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and progestin treatment outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with hyperplasia between 2003 and 2011. Demographics, past medical history, BMI, hormonal therapy, and histologic treatment response were abstracted. Patients with CAH who received progestin therapy were examined, and rates of regression were assessed.
RESULTS: Of 623 patients identified, 117 had CAH and satisfied the inclusion criteria. Median age was 34, and nearly, two-thirds (64%) were nulliparous. Mean BMI was 40.2, and 81% were obese (BMI 30-39.9: 36%, BMI ≥ 40: 45%). 103 patients (88%) received systemic progestin therapy and 14 patients (12%) received levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUS). 47 patients (40%) had a complete response to progestin-based therapy. BMI had no effect on the rate of complete response. The proportions of CAH patients with complete regression after hormonal therapy were BMI < 30: 39%, 30-39.9: 40%, and ≥ 40: 36% (P = 0.73). Women treated with LNG-IUS displayed higher rates of complete regression than those receiving systemic therapy (62% versus 38%, P = 0.096), and those with class III obesity were more likely than non-obese patients to receive LNG-IUS although neither reached statistical significance (< 40: 6.7% versus ≥ 40: 17%, P = 0.09).
CONCLUSION: In this morbidly obese population, response to progestin therapy was generally low; body habitus did not impact treatment outcome for CAH, but local therapy may be more effective than systemic therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial hyperplasia; Intrauterine device; Obesity; Progestins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706187      PMCID: PMC7528453          DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05059-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  29 in total

1.  Committee Opinion No. 631: Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Vinita Parkash; Oluwole Fadare; Carmen Tornos; W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Impact of obesity on the results of fertility-sparing management for atypical hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Clémentine Gonthier; Francine Walker; Dominique Luton; Chadi Yazbeck; Patrick Madelenat; Martin Koskas
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Risk of complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in relation to anthropometric measures and reproductive history.

Authors:  Meira Epplein; Susan D Reed; Lynda F Voigt; Katherine M Newton; Victoria L Holt; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality.

Authors:  Sune F Nielsen; Børge G Nordestgaard; Stig E Bojesen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator.

Authors:  G C Rodriguez; N Yaqub; M E King
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Disparity in physician perception of patients' adherence to medications by obesity status.

Authors:  Mary Margaret Huizinga; Sara N Bleich; Mary Catherine Beach; Jeanne M Clark; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 7.  Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gallos; Manjeet Shehmar; Shakila Thangaratinam; Thalis K Papapostolou; Arri Coomarasamy; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Cynthia L Ogden; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients.

Authors:  R J Kurman; P F Kaminski; H J Norris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Effect of oral versus intrauterine progestins on weight in women undergoing fertility preserving therapy for complex atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Diana Cholakian; Kari Hacker; Amanda N Fader; Paola A Gehrig; Edward J Tanner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  4 in total

1.  MPA alters metabolic phenotype of endometrial cancer-associated fibroblasts from obese women via IRS2 signaling.

Authors:  Intan Sofia Omar; Amira Hajirah Abd Jamil; Noor Azmi Mat Adenan; Ivy Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Progestin therapy for obese women with complex atypical hyperplasia: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device vs systemic therapy.

Authors:  Rachel S Mandelbaum; Marcia A Ciccone; David J Nusbaum; Mahdi Khoshchehreh; Heena Purswani; Elise B Morocco; Meghan B Smith; Shinya Matsuzaki; Christina E Dancz; Begum Ozel; Lynda D Roman; Richard J Paulson; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Route-specific association of progestin therapy and concurrent metformin use in obese women with complex atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Marcia Ciccone; Mahdi Khoshchehreh; Heena Pursuwani; Elise B Morocco; Shinya Matsuzaki; Christina E Dancz; Begum Ozel; Richard J Paulson; Lynda Roman
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  Efficacy of the LNG-IUS for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early stage endometrial cancer: Can biomarkers predict response?

Authors:  Molly Dore; Sara Filoche; Kirsty Danielson; Claire Henry
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.