Literature DB >> 16213906

Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study.

Atsushi Watanabe1, Tetsuya Koyanagi, Hisayoshi Ohsawa, Tohru Mawatari, Shinji Nakashima, Noriyuki Takahashi, Hiroki Sato, Tomio Abe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major pulmonary resection with systematic node dissection (SND) for early lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is performed in many institutes, but the feasibility of SND for early lung cancer by VATS remains controversial. The aim of this study was to elucidate the feasibility and safety of SND by VATS.
METHODS: Three hundred fifty patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent pulmonary major resection with SND between 1998 and 2003 were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 191 (VATS group) underwent pulmonary resection with SND by VATS; 159 patients (open thoracotomy [OT] group) did so through anterolateral thoracotomy. The clinical and pathologic data, including the number of dissected nodes in each nodal station, of the 2 groups were compared to evaluate the feasibility of SND by VATS.
RESULTS: Pathologic data showed that, in the VATS group, more patients had adenocarcinoma (P = .0078) and fewer patients had advanced factors than the OT group. The greatest tumor diameter was 24.5 mm and 29.6 mm in the VATS group and OT group, respectively (P < .0001). The total number of mediastinal nodes dissected in right upper lobectomy plus right middle lobectomy (RUL+RML), right lower lobectomy (RLL), left upper lobectomy (LUL), and lower left lobectomy (LLL) also did not differ between the 2 groups. The total number of mediastinal nodes dissected in RUL+RML, RLL, LUL, and LLL was 19.7 in the VATS group versus 22.0 in the OT group (P = .122), 23.4 versus 21.0 (P = .241), 14.8 versus 17.5 (P = .123), and 18.8 versus 15.8 (P = .202), respectively. The number of dissected nodes in each nodal station in RUL+RML, RLL, LUL, and LLL was similar between the 2 groups. Operative mortality, morbidity, or recurrence did not differ between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: With regard to the number of dissected nodes, SND by VATS was not inferior to that of OT. SND by VATS is technically feasible and safe, and seems acceptable for clinical stage I lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213906     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  44 in total

Review 1.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sanghoon Jheon; Hee Chul Yang; Sukki Cho
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Clinical feasibility and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) anatomical resection in patients with central lung cancer: a comparison with thoracotomy.

Authors:  Hee Suk Jung; Hyeong Ryul Kim; Se Hoon Choi; Yong Hee Kim; Dong Kwan Kim; Seung Il Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Johannes Bodner; Herbert Maier; Christoph Schwinghammer; Burkhard Pichler; Paolo Lucciarini; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  VATS lobectomy lymph node management.

Authors:  Gavin M Wright
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Efficacy of mediastinal lymph node dissection during thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Hanghang Wang; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

6.  VATS right upper lobectomy.

Authors:  Gan-Jun Kang; Wen-Yang Jiang; Song-Ping Xie; Jie Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a single-center, case-matched study.

Authors:  Keqiang Liu; Jing Zhao; Weiqiang Zhang; Jian Tan; Jingbo Ma; Yingxin Pei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 8.  Contraindications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy and determinants of conversion to open.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hanna; Mark F Berry; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Risk factors and impact of conversion from VATS to open lobectomy: analysis from a national database.

Authors:  Stefano Bongiolatti; Alessandro Gonfiotti; Domenico Viggiano; Sara Borgianni; Leonardo Politi; Roberto Crisci; Carlo Curcio; Luca Voltolini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery involving major pulmonary resection for central tumors.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakanishi; Yoshihisa Fujino; Soichi Oka; Seiichi Odate
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.