Literature DB >> 30705937

Gender differences and management of stroke risk of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in an upper middle-income country: Insights from the CARMEN-AF registry.

J Antonio González-Hermosillo1, Manuel A Baños-González2, Milton E Guevara-Valdivia3, Jorge A Vázquez-Acosta4, Manuel Odín de Los Ríos Ibarra5, Kulio A Aguilar-Linares6, Carlos Cantú-Brito7, José L Leiva-Pons8, Gerardo Pozas-Garza9, Eddie A Favela-Pérez10, Manlio F Márquez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Several studies have suggested that female AF patients could have a greater risk for stroke. There is scarce information about clinical characteristics and use of antithrombotic therapies in Latin American patients with nonvalvular AF.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the gender differences in clinical characteristics, thromboembolic risk, and antithrombotic therapy of patients with nonvalvular AF recruited in Mexico, an upper middle-income country, into the prospective national CARMEN-AF Registry.
METHODS: A total of 1423 consecutive patients, with at least one thromboembolic risk factor were enrolled in CARMEN-AF Registry during a three-year period (2014-2017). They were categorized according to Gender.
RESULTS: Overall, 48.6% were women, mean age 70 ± 12 years. Diabetes, smoking, alcoholism, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and obstructive sleep apnea were higher in men. Most women were found with paroxysmal AF (40.6%), and most men with permanent AF (44.0%). No gender differences were found in the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (30.5% in women vs. 28.0% in men). No gender differences were found in the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) (33.8% women vs 35.4% men).
CONCLUSIONS: CARMEN-AF Registry demonstrates that in Mexico, regardless of gender, a large proportion of patients remain undertreated. No gender differences were found in the use of VKA or DOAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AF, Atrial fibrillation; APD, Antiplatelet drugs; ATT, Antithrombotic therapy; Antithrombotic therapy; Atrial fibrillation; DOAC, Direct oral anticoagulants; Gender; Mexico; Stroke; Thromboembolic risk; VKA, Vitamin K antagonists

Year:  2019        PMID: 30705937      PMCID: PMC6349010          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc        ISSN: 2352-9067


Introduction

Despite a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in male subjects [1], an increased risk for stroke has been described in women [2,3]. Outcomes from recent registries have proven that female gender is an independent stroke risk factor in AF, and the inclusion of female gender in stroke risk stratification models, such as the CHA2DS2-VASc score, have improved risk assessment [4]. Guidelines for atrial fibrillation recommend that oral anticoagulation should be considered in patients with ≥1 non-gender related risk factors for stroke [5]. Thus, oral anticoagulation seems to depend predominantly upon guideline-related differences in stroke risk stratification rather than on gender hence the decision to prescribe anticoagulants is not gender-dependent but may rely predominately upon clinical stroke risk factors. Nevertheless, published data indicate variability in anticoagulation use by gender, ranging from a 50% lower uptake in women versus men to more frequent anticoagulation in women [5]. The objective of the present survey was to establish the sex differences in AF characteristics, thromboembolic risk factors, concomitant diseases, and thromboprophylaxis. Our aim is to highlight potential treatment discrepancies according to gender that could impact the prognosis of patients with AF.

Material and methods

CARMEN-AF is an ongoing, observational, longitudinal, cross-sectional, multicenter, nationwide registry of antithrombotic therapy for nonvalvular AF in Mexico. The complete protocol has already been published [6]. Mexico's economic status as an upper-middle income country is based on the 2013 World Bank Classification according to gross national income per capita [7]. Institutional ethics committees in all participant centers approved the protocol. The registry was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients signed an informed consent.

Study population

Patients ≥18 years old with one or more risk factors for thromboembolism evaluated by CHA2DS2-VASc score and diagnosed with nonvalvular AF with at least 6 months duration prior to their inclusion were eligible for inclusion in this Registry. Patients were recruited regardless of anti-thrombotic therapy (ATT): antiplatelet drugs (APD), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Demographic data, clinical variables, comorbidities, and treatment were collected by the responsible physician using a paper-based case report form, with subsequent capture in an electronic form for data storage. Thromboembolic and bleeding risks were assessed based on CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, respectively. Thromboembolic risk was defined as moderate with CHA2DS2-VASc score = 1 and high-risk with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, irrespectively of gender. Bleeding risk was defined as low (HAS-BLED score = 0), moderate (HAS-BLED score = 1–2) or high (score ≥ 3).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS v. 22.0. Variables are presented as number (percentage) or mean (±SD), as appropriate. Demographic differences among continuous variables with normal distribution were examined using Student's t-test. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used when variables failed normality test. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test, either Fisher's exact test or Yates's correction for continuity. A 2-tail test with a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics

A total of 1423 consecutive patients were enrolled in a three-year period (September 2014–December 2017), 48.6% were women. They were older than men (70 ± 12 vs 68 ± 13 years, P = 0.002). Complete demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1. Body mass index was not significantly different between males and females.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics by Gender.

All(n = 1423)Male(n = 731)Female(n = 692)P
Demographic characteristics
Gender (%)51.448.6ns
Age, years ± SD69 ± 1368 ± 1370 ± 12=0.002
Weight, kg ± SD75 ± 1680 ± 1569 ± 14<0.0001
Body mass index, kg/m2 ± SD28.5 ± 5.028.4 ± 4.628.7 ± 5.4ns



Comorbidities
Hypertension72.571.373.8ns
Diabetes28.431.325.3=0.007
Heart failure23.625.321.8ns
Smoking16.423.98.5<0.0001
Alcoholism9.217.10.9<0.0001
Nonischemic cardiomyopathya8.910.37.5=0.042
Coronary artery disease7.19.74.3<0.0001
Obstructive sleep apnea3.95.22.6=0.008
Peripheral artery disease1.81.02.7=0.010

P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test and Student's t-test.

Hypertensive, Idiopathic, and restrictive.

Baseline characteristics by Gender. P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test and Student's t-test. Hypertensive, Idiopathic, and restrictive. The history of comorbidities was significantly different between genders; men were more likely to be smokers, have higher alcohol intake, and have higher prevalence of diabetes, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Prevalence of hypertension was similar, and peripheral artery disease was more common in women (Table 1). Regarding the AF type, paroxysmal AF was more prevalent in women (40.6%) and permanent AF in men (44.0%; P = 0.015). AF was asymptomatic in 59.4% of patients. No differences were found between both genders.

Thromboembolic risk

Overall, the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.1 ± 1.5. Women had a significant higher risk score than men (3.7 ± 1.4 vs 2.6 ± 1.3; P < 0.0001). Significant statistical differences were found comparing gender groups in stroke risk (Fig. 1). A higher stroke risk (score ≥ 2) was more frequent in women (93.5% vs 78.1%; P < 0.0001).
Fig. 1

Gender and stroke risk based on CHA2DS2-VASc.

*P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test.

Gender and stroke risk based on CHA2DS2-VASc. *P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test.

Bleeding risk

There was a significant difference in HAS-BLED score between men and women; it was higher in men (1.82 ± 1.0 vs 1.71 ± 0.9; P = 0.032). According to bleeding risk, more women had a low risk of bleeding than men (9.7% vs 6.3%, P = 0.012), while more men had a high risk (20.8% vs 16.8%, P = 0.030) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Gender and bleeding risk based on HAS-BLED.

*P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test.

Gender and bleeding risk based on HAS-BLED. *P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test.

Antithrombotic therapy in relation to stroke and bleeding risks

Antithrombotic therapies in relation to thromboembolic risk are presented in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Gender and antithrombotic therapy according to CHA2DS2-VASc risk.

*P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test.

Gender and antithrombotic therapy according to CHA2DS2-VASc risk. *P value was obtained comparing Gender groups using Chi-square test. For CHA2DS2-VASc = 1, 55.5% of women and 68.8% of men were prescribed anticoagulants. The rate of APD use alone was higher in women (26.7% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.029) in patients with moderate risk. In the group of high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2), men received fewer oral anticoagulants (62.0% vs 64.9%; P < 0.0001), and a higher percentage did not receive antithrombotic therapy (18.6% vs 14,4%; P = 0.029). APD choice was similar between genders in patients with high risk. Overall, in our analysis, the use of DOAC was similar in men and women (35.4% vs 33.8%). The use of dabigatran was not significantly different between female and male patients. Rivaroxaban was used more frequently in males (16.0% vs 11.4%, P = 0.007), while apixaban was preferred in women (11.4% vs 6.8%, P = 0.002). Of the studied population, 9.5% of women and 19.2% men at high risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED score = ≥3) did not receive any antithrombotic therapy (P = 0.021).

Discussion

In this nationwide survey of sex differences in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation there were some differences and similarities to international data [5,8]. We found that women with AF with a high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc = ≥2) were more likely than men to receive anticoagulants. In Asian populations, the CODE-AF registry [9] also reports that a slightly higher proportion of women with a CHA2DS2-VASc = ≥2 were taking oral anticoagulants than men (85.7% vs 81.9%). Data collected by other large-scale registries observed a similar anticoagulation by women and men [5,8]. Nevertheless, our findings show that among high-risk patients, anticoagulant use in Mexico, an upper middle-income country, remains suboptimal in both sexes. One-third did not receive an anticoagulant. These findings of suboptimal thromboprophylaxis are of concern and indicate the need for improved stroke prevention in AF. However, for patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc equal to 1, there was an opposite between-gender difference in anticoagulant use (55.5% and 68.8% for women and men, respectively), an important difference already identified in GLORIA-AF and CODE-AF [5,9], which could reflect a different clinical approach to a score of 1 in both genders, rather than an underuse of anticoagulation in women compared with men. On the contrary, women with this score seem over-treated with anticoagulants. Current guidelines state that women with CHA2DS2-VASc equal to 1, (1 point for female gender) are at low risk for stroke and should not be anticoagulated [10]. Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with one non-gender related risk factor for stroke, that is CHA2DS2-VASc = 1 for men and CHA2DS2-VASc = ≥2 for women [11]. In CARMEN-AF, the high rate of use of antiplatelet therapy in women with a CHA2DS2-VASc = 1, (26.7% and 13.1% for women and men, respectively) does not correlate with the rates of cardiovascular diseases observed in this registry among women, indicating that antiplatelets are still being given to low-risk women for stroke prevention, thus increasing bleeding risk. No gender differences were found for the use of direct oral anticoagulants, a new kind of therapy well accepted in Mexico. Although AF is less prevalent in women than in men, women with AF have a higher risk of stroke and death than men. The risk of developing AF is higher in men than women. However, because women live longer than men and the prevalence of AF increases with age, there are more women than men with AF, basically they have the same risk as men but shifted a few years along. [12] In our registry the history of previous stroke was 13.3%, without gender differences. Consistent with previous reports, female subjects were older, but they did not have a more prevalence of AF, or more symptoms than males as was previously found [5,8,9]. However, in comparison to men when women have AF, their risk of stroke is greater than that of men, thus they should receive more aggressive anticoagulation, what is happening in Mexico.

Limitations

CARMEN-AF was based on the prescription of antithrombotic therapy by different specialists, therefore, our data may not apply to other health care givers. According to protocol, this survey recruited only patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 1. Thus, no data on patients with score zero (low risk of stroke) were available. Both patients and physicians knew they were participants of a registry; this might have led to higher overall anticoagulation rates compared with general population. We did not analyze the associations between anticoagulant use and concomitant antiplatelet therapy use by gender.

Conclusions

In Mexico, female patients with AF are treated more aggressively than male patients with AF. They received anticoagulants more frequently than male patients. Since suboptimal use of anticoagulants was common in both sexes, it is necessary to improve current evidence-based guidelines implementation for the management of nonvalvular AF and stroke prevention. No gender differences were found in the use of VKA or DOAC.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this article.
  10 in total

1.  Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Arrhythmias: Sex Differences in Electrophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne M Gillis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Gender Differences in Antithrombotic Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: The GLORIA-AF Registry Program.

Authors:  Michał Mazurek; Menno V Huisman; Kenneth J Rothman; Miney Paquette; Christine Teutsch; Hans-Christoph Diener; Sergio J Dubner; Jonathan L Halperin; Kristina Zint; Lionel Riou França; Shihai Lu; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.

Authors:  Paulus Kirchhof; Stefano Benussi; Dipak Kotecha; Anders Ahlsson; Dan Atar; Barbara Casadei; Manuel Castella; Hans-Christoph Diener; Hein Heidbuchel; Jeroen Hendriks; Gerhard Hindricks; Antonis S Manolis; Jonas Oldgren; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu; Ulrich Schotten; Bart Van Putte; Panagiotis Vardas; Stefan Agewall; John Camm; Gonzalo Baron Esquivias; Werner Budts; Scipione Carerj; Filip Casselman; Antonio Coca; Raffaele De Caterina; Spiridon Deftereos; Dobromir Dobrev; José M Ferro; Gerasimos Filippatos; Donna Fitzsimons; Bulent Gorenek; Maxine Guenoun; Stefan H Hohnloser; Philippe Kolh; Gregory Y H Lip; Athanasios Manolis; John McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Raphael Rosenhek; Frank Ruschitzka; Irina Savelieva; Sanjay Sharma; Piotr Suwalski; Juan Luis Tamargo; Clare J Taylor; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Adriaan A Voors; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  [Design of an atrial fibrillation and embolic risk registry in Mexico: CARMEN-AF].

Authors:  Jesús A González-Hermosillo; Manlio F Márquez; Salvador Ocampo-Peña
Journal:  Arch Cardiol Mex       Date:  2016-12-13

5.  Does sex affect anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation? The prospective global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Sophie K Rushton-Smith; Samuel Z Goldhaber; David A Fitzmaurice; Lorenzo G Mantovani; Shinya Goto; Sylvia Haas; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Alan John Camm; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Petr Janský; Wael Al Mahmeed; Seil Oh; Martin van Eickels; Pekka Raatikainen; Jan Steffel; Ali Oto; Gloria Kayani; Gabriele Accetta; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-02-24

6.  Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Thomas J Wang; Eric P Leip; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joseph M Massaro; Alexa Beiser; Philip A Wolf; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Robby Nieuwlaat; Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Atrial fibrillation prevalence revisited.

Authors:  L Friberg; L Bergfeldt
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study.

Authors:  Jan Heeringa; Deirdre A M van der Kuip; Albert Hofman; Jan A Kors; Gerard van Herpen; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Theo Stijnen; Gregory Y H Lip; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Gender-related Differences in Management of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in an Asian Population.

Authors:  Jung Myung Lee; Tae Hoon Kim; Myung Jin Cha; Junbeom Park; Jin Kyu Park; Ki Woon Kang; Jaemin Shim; Jae Sun Uhm; Jun Kim; Hyung Wook Park; Young Soo Lee; Eue Keun Choi; Chang Soo Kim; Boyoung Joung; Jin Bae Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.243

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Anticoagulation in difficult settings RELOADed: Evidence for applicability of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation, renal impairment and cancer.

Authors:  Anke C Fender; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-05-11

Review 2.  Highlights and comments on EHRA/HRS/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome.

Authors:  Márcio Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo; Gerardo Rodriguez Diez; Santiago Nava-Townsend; Alberto Alfie; Carina Hardy; Dario Di Toro; Manlio F Márquez
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants with warfarin in Latin American patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Zhiyu Su; Hao Zhang; Wenfeng He; Jianyong Ma; Junquan Zeng; Xinhua Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Anticoagulation Therapy by Age and Embolic Risk for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Mexico, an Upper-Middle-Income Country: The CARMEN-AF Registry.

Authors:  Manlio F Márquez; Manuel A Baños-González; Milton E Guevara-Valdivia; Jorge Vázquez-Acosta; Manuel O de Los Ríos Ibarra; Julio A Aguilar-Linares; Marcelo Jiménez-Cruz; Norberto Matadamas-Hernández; Rocío Camacho-Casillas; Reynaldo Magaña-Magaña; Ulises Rojel-Martínez; Marco A Alcocer-Gamba; Susano Lara-Vaca; Humbert Rodríguez-Reyes; Marco A Islava-Gálvez; Lidia E Betancourt-Hernández; Nicolás Reyes-Reyes; Miguel E Beltrán-Gámez; Carlos Cantú-Brito; Alberto Z Baños-Velasco; Pedro J Del Rivero Morfin; J Antonio González-Hermosillo
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2020-04-10

5.  Prescription of oral anticoagulation in geriatric patients with atrial fibrillation

Authors:  Génesis Ramírez-Prieto; José E Pombo-Bartelt; Guadalupe Rojas-Calderón; José J García-González
Journal:  Arch Cardiol Mex       Date:  2022-01-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.