Literature DB >> 25714828

Does sex affect anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation? The prospective global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation.

Gregory Y H Lip, Sophie K Rushton-Smith, Samuel Z Goldhaber, David A Fitzmaurice, Lorenzo G Mantovani, Shinya Goto, Sylvia Haas, Jean-Pierre Bassand, Alan John Camm, Giuseppe Ambrosio, Petr Janský, Wael Al Mahmeed, Seil Oh, Martin van Eickels, Pekka Raatikainen, Jan Steffel, Ali Oto, Gloria Kayani, Gabriele Accetta, Ajay K Kakkar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), women are at higher risk of stroke than men. Using prospective cohort data from a large global population of patients with nonvalvular AF, we sought to identify any differences in the use of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in women and men. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a prospective multicenter observational registry with 858 randomly selected sites in 30 countries. A total of 17 184 patients with newly diagnosed (≤6 weeks) nonvalvular AF and ≥1 additional investigator-defined stroke risk factor(s) were recruited (March 2010 to June 2013). The main outcome measure was the use of anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists, factor Xa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors) for stroke prevention at AF diagnosis. Of 17 184 patients enrolled, 43.8% were women. More women than men were at moderate-to-high risk of stroke (CHADS2 score ≥2: 65.1% versus 54.7%). Rates of anticoagulant use were not different overall (60.9% of men versus 60.8% of women) and in patients with a CHADS2 score ≥2 (adjusted odds ratio for women versus men, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.09). In patients at low risk (CHA2DS2-VASc of 0 in men and 1 in women), 41.8% of men and 41.1% of women received an anticoagulant. In patients at high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2), 35.4% of men and 38.4% of women did not receive an anticoagulant.
CONCLUSIONS: These contemporary global data show that anticoagulant use for stroke prevention is no different in men and women with nonvalvular AF. Thromboprophylaxis was, however, suboptimal in substantial proportions of men and women, with underuse in those at moderate-to-high risk of stroke and overuse in those at low risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; embolism; sex; stroke; women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25714828     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  28 in total

1.  Once-daily rivaroxaban for long-term stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sotiris Antoniou; Walid Amara
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 2.  Impact of Conventional Stroke Risk Factors on Stroke in Women: An Update.

Authors:  Tracy E Madsen; Virginia J Howard; Monik Jiménez; Kathryn M Rexrode; Maria Czarina Acelajado; Dawn Kleindorfer; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Practitioner Gender and Quality of Care in Ambulatory Cardiology Practices: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry.

Authors:  Dipti Gupta; Fengming Tang; Frederick A Masoudi; Philip G Jones; Paul S Chan; Stacie L Daugherty
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Disparities and Temporal Trends in the Use of Anticoagulation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Nicole B Sur; Kefeng Wang; Marco R Di Tullio; Carolina M Gutierrez; Chuanhui Dong; Sebastian Koch; Hannah Gardener; Enid J García-Rivera; Juan Carlos Zevallos; W Scott Burgin; David Z Rose; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Jose G Romano; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Atrial fibrillation in women: treatment.

Authors:  Darae Ko; Faisal Rahman; Maria A P Martins; Elaine M Hylek; Patrick T Ellinor; Renate B Schnabel; Emelia J Benjamin; Ingrid E Christophersen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Women in clinical research: what we need for progress.

Authors:  Emily M Bucholz; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-02-24

Review 7.  Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation-Update on Risk Assessment, Treatment, and Long-Term Risk.

Authors:  Charlotte J Bai; Nidhi Madan; Shaza Alshahrani; Neelum T Aggarwal; Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-27

Review 8.  Disparities in Cardiac Care of Women: Current Data and Possible Solutions.

Authors:  Rosalyn O Adigun; Amber N Boler; Rekha Mankad
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 9.  Women and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Annabelle Santos Volgman; Emelia J Benjamin; Anne B Curtis; Margaret C Fang; Kathryn J Lindley; Gerald V Naccarelli; Carl J Pepine; Odayme Quesada; Marmar Vaseghi; Albert L Waldo; Nanette K Wenger; Andrea M Russo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Non-adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guidelines in Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review of the Extent of and Factors in Guideline Non-adherence.

Authors:  Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes; Sandra Salter; Leanne Chalmers; Luke Bereznicki; Kenneth Lee
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.