Literature DB >> 30705553

The 'John Thomas' sign and pelvic fractures-Fact or humorous myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Louis Gerber1, Abdullah E Laher1, Callistus O A Enyuma1,2, Jared McDowall1, Sunday J Aigbodion1, Sean Buchanan1,3, Ahmed Adam4,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: An incidental and sometimes humorous finding on an Antero-Posterior (AP) pelvis X-ray view is that of the John Thomas Sign (JTS), which is defined as positive, when the penile shadow points towards the side of a hip or pelvic fracture in male patients. Despite previous research reports and studies performed on the JTS sign, uncertainty with regards to its clinical relevance still remains. The objective of this review was to assess the clinical validity and accuracy of this sign by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was performed (May 2017), using the following databases: BMJ best practice, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, PubMed and Scopus. Studies comparing the predictability of the JTS were critically appraised. The summary effect (and 95% CI) was estimated using a random effect model and the Restricted Maximum Likelihood Method. The pooled sensitivity as well as the summary effect log odds ratio was determined. Selected studies were further ranked for quality and relevance using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) (Oxford 2013) tool.
RESULTS: In total, nine articles were isolated and assessed. A total of 1942 participants were included. The mean sample size amongst these included studies was 243 participants with a median of 198 participants. Since the necessary data needed for the Meta-analysis was only present in the 6/9 studies assessed, these 6 were analyzed further. The JTS was positive in 1089 out of 1439 patients with a pooled sensitivity of 75.7% (95%CI, 73.4%-77.9%). There was a large variation in the sensitivity and specificity amongst studies, accounting for a non-significant summary Odds Ratio effect of -0.03.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, there is insufficient statistical evidence to support the reliability of the JTS to predict the laterality in the case of a hip fracture on the standard AP pelvis x-ray.

Entities:  

Keywords:  John Thomas sign; Oram’s sign; Ormr sign; Penile shadow; Penis shadow; Ray camel sign; Solooki sign; Throckmorton sign

Year:  2017        PMID: 30705553      PMCID: PMC6349582          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  11 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Does penis radiological shadow indicate the side of hip fracture?

Authors:  G J Mouzopoulos; M K Stamatakos; D J Mouzopoulos
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

3.  [Oram's sign for hip or pelvic disorder].

Authors:  Ole Brink; Lars Carl Borris; Kjeld Andersen; Kjeld Hougaard
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2009-12-14

4.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Genital asymmetry in men.

Authors:  A F Bogaert
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Pelvic fractures and mortality.

Authors:  K H Chong; T DeCoster; T Osler; B Robinson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Richard McCormack; Eric J Strauss; Basil J Alwattar; Nirmal C Tejwani
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2010

8.  John Thomas sign--a memorable but misleading sign in hip fractures.

Authors:  I G Murphy; C G Murphy; E J Heffernan
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.

Authors:  Paul T von Hippel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Survivorship and severe complications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the national trauma data bank.

Authors:  Amir Matityahu; Joshua Elson; Saam Morshed; Meir Marmor
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2012-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.