I G Murphy1, C G Murphy2, E J Heffernan3. 1. Department of Radiology, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: iangmurphy@gmail.com. 2. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm park, Dublin 4, Ireland. 3. Department of Radiology, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The John Thomas sign is a favourite of medical students and theorizes that in femoral neck fractures, the male member will lie to the side of the fracture on the plain radiograph. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, and examine the phenomenon of eponymous signs. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) How accurate is the sign in the context of a consecutive series of male patients with hip fractures? (2) Is there a relationship between side and size of penile lie and the side of fracture? HYPOTHESIS: That the accuracy of the John Thomas sign is, like many eponymous signs, spurious. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred male AP pelvis radiographs were examined, of which 100 had a hip fracture and compared these against 100 control films that did not. Age at presentation, and the side, length and angle of penile lie were measured. RESULTS: The results show two findings: that the accuracy of the supposed "sign" is less accurate than the toss of a coin; and that left lie and left-sided fractures are more common. We fail to show a relationship between side of fracture, John Thomas size or degree of angulation. CONCLUSION: John Thomas sign is no better than the toss of a coin in relation to hip fractures, and is not related to side of fracture, or penile attitude. We propose that the side of lie observed in male fractures may be as a result of handedness or natural underlying body asymmetry rather than as a result of the fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Case control study.
OBJECTIVE: The John Thomas sign is a favourite of medical students and theorizes that in femoral neck fractures, the male member will lie to the side of the fracture on the plain radiograph. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, and examine the phenomenon of eponymous signs. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) How accurate is the sign in the context of a consecutive series of male patients with hip fractures? (2) Is there a relationship between side and size of penile lie and the side of fracture? HYPOTHESIS: That the accuracy of the John Thomas sign is, like many eponymous signs, spurious. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred male AP pelvis radiographs were examined, of which 100 had a hip fracture and compared these against 100 control films that did not. Age at presentation, and the side, length and angle of penile lie were measured. RESULTS: The results show two findings: that the accuracy of the supposed "sign" is less accurate than the toss of a coin; and that left lie and left-sided fractures are more common. We fail to show a relationship between side of fracture, John Thomas size or degree of angulation. CONCLUSION: John Thomas sign is no better than the toss of a coin in relation to hip fractures, and is not related to side of fracture, or penile attitude. We propose that the side of lie observed in male fractures may be as a result of handedness or natural underlying body asymmetry rather than as a result of the fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Case control study.
Authors: Louis Gerber; Abdullah E Laher; Callistus O A Enyuma; Jared McDowall; Sunday J Aigbodion; Sean Buchanan; Ahmed Adam Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2017-10-24