Khanin Iamthanaporn1, Varah Yuenyongviwat1, Teeranan Laohawiriyakamol2, Pramot Tanutit2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand. 2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee arthroplasty has the benefits of less postoperative pain and a faster recovery time. An MIS instrument was designed to help surgeons perform this procedure under reduced visualization conditions. A medial cutting guide of the distal femur is used to cut the distal femoral bone without patella subluxation. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the distal femoral bone cut between the medial and standard anterior cutting guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two orthopedic surgeons, who specialize in total knee arthroplasty and are familiar with both of these cutting guides, performed the procedures. Forty-eight synthetic saw bones were used, and five-degree valgus medial and anterior cutting guides were randomly assigned to the surgeons. After the osteotomies were performed, the synthetic saw bones were investigated via plain radiographs. Two independent radiologists measured the medial distal femoral angle (MDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA). RESULTS: The MDFA in the medial cutting group was statistically significantly different from that of the anterior cutting group (94.18° ± 1.47° vs. 94.98° ± 1.14°, P = 0.041). However, the PDFA was not different between the two groups. Likewise, the number of outliers was not different between the groups when a ± 2° error was defined as an outlier (P = 0.609 for MDFA and P = 0.359 for PDFA). Moreover, a high degree of reliability was found in both MDFA and PDFA measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.813 and 0.824, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental study, the MIS medial cutting guide was less accurate than the standard cutting guide in the distal femoral cut.
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee arthroplasty has the benefits of less postoperative pain and a faster recovery time. An MIS instrument was designed to help surgeons perform this procedure under reduced visualization conditions. A medial cutting guide of the distal femur is used to cut the distal femoral bone without patella subluxation. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the distal femoral bone cut between the medial and standard anterior cutting guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two orthopedic surgeons, who specialize in total knee arthroplasty and are familiar with both of these cutting guides, performed the procedures. Forty-eight synthetic saw bones were used, and five-degree valgus medial and anterior cutting guides were randomly assigned to the surgeons. After the osteotomies were performed, the synthetic saw bones were investigated via plain radiographs. Two independent radiologists measured the medial distal femoral angle (MDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA). RESULTS: The MDFA in the medial cutting group was statistically significantly different from that of the anterior cutting group (94.18° ± 1.47° vs. 94.98° ± 1.14°, P = 0.041). However, the PDFA was not different between the two groups. Likewise, the number of outliers was not different between the groups when a ± 2° error was defined as an outlier (P = 0.609 for MDFA and P = 0.359 for PDFA). Moreover, a high degree of reliability was found in both MDFA and PDFA measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.813 and 0.824, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental study, the MIS medial cutting guide was less accurate than the standard cutting guide in the distal femoral cut.
Authors: Robert L Barrack; C Lowry Barnes; R Stephen J Burnett; Derek Miller; John C Clohisy; William J Maloney Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 4.757