| Literature DB >> 30705513 |
Atsuko Kamiya1, Takeshi Hara1, Masayuki Tsuda2, Emi Tsuru2, Yasushi Kuroda1, Urara Ota1, Takashi Karashima3, Hideo Fukuhara3, Keiji Inoue3, Masahiro Ishizuka1, Motowo Nakajima1, Tohru Tanaka1.
Abstract
5-Aminolevulinic acid, a natural amino acid, activates mitochondrial respiration and induces heme oxygenase-1 expression. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus are associated with age-related mitochondrial respiration defect, oxidative stress and inflammation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid with sodium ferrous citrate on early renal damage and hepatic steatosis. 7-Month-old C57BL/6 mice were fed with a standard diet or high fat diet for 9 weeks, which were orally administered 300 mg/kg 5-aminolevulinic acid combined with 47 mg/kg sodium ferrous citrate (5-aminolevulinic acid/sodium ferrous citrate) or vehicle for the last 5 weeks. We observed that 5-aminolevulinic acid/sodium ferrous citrate significantly decreased body weight, fat weight, hepatic lipid deposits and improved levels of blood glucose and oral glucose tolerance test. In addition, 5-aminolevulinic acid/sodium ferrous citrate suppressed increased glomerular tuft area in high fat diet-fed mice, which was associated with increased heme oxygenase-1 protein expression. Our findings demonstrate additional evidence that 5-aminolevulinic acid/sodium ferrous citrate could improve glucose and lipid metabolism in diabetic mice. 5-Aminolevulinic acid/sodium ferrous citrate has potential application in obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated disease such as diabetic nephropathy and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Entities:
Keywords: 5-aminolevulinic acid; diabetic nephropathy; heme oxygenase-1; hepatic steatosis; high fat diet
Year: 2018 PMID: 30705513 PMCID: PMC6348406 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.18-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Body weights and food intakes in HFD-induced obese mice. (A) Body weights after administration of ALA. (B) Food intakes. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. SD, standard diet group (n = 7); HFD, high fat diet group (n = 12); HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with administration of ALA and SFC group (n = 11) (†p<0.01, ††p<0.001 vs SD group; *p<0.05 vs HFD group).
Organ weights per body weight (mg/g bw) in high fat diet-induced obese mice
| Group | Liver | Kidney | Retroperitoneal and perirenal fat | Epididymal fat | Mesenteric fat | Gastrocnemius muscle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | 44.3 ± 2.8 | 10.9 ± 0.56 | 10.7 ± 1.06 | 21.9 ± 1.89 | 12.3 ± 0.70 | 5.6 ± 0.10 |
| HFD | 39.0 ± 2.5 | 8.6 ± 0.29† | 31.2 ± 1.77† | 53.1 ± 3.46† | 25.9 ± 2.72† | 4.4 ± 0.13† |
| HFD + ALA/SFC | 43.5 ± 0.9 | 10.2 ± 0.48 | 19.2 ± 2.39 | 42.3 ± 5.02 | 16.8 ± 1.97 | 4.8 ± 0.19 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 7–12. SD, standard diet group; HFD, high fat diet group; HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with the administration of ALA and SFC group (†p<0.001 vs SD group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs HFD group).
Blood biochemistry in high fat diet-induced obese mice
| Glucose (mg/dl) | TCHO (mg/dl) | TG (mg/dl) | Insulin (ng/ml) | Leptin (ng/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | 183 ± 15.7 | 84 ± 10.4 | 72 ± 8.3 | 1.02 ± 0.186 | 7.29 ± 1.02 |
| HFD | 186 ± 10.8 | 140 ± 9.0† | 80 ± 6.4 | 4.37 ± 1.10† | 46.9 ± 6.71† |
| HFD + ALA/SFC | 155 ± 5.9 | 119 ± 9.1 | 91 ± 10.8 | 1.49 ± 0.46 | 16.5 ± 2.98 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Blood samples were collected at around 9:00 am on the measurement days. n = 7–12. TCHO, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; SD, standard diet group; HFD, high fat diet group; HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with the administration of ALA and SFC group (†p<0.001 vs SD group; *p<0.05, **p<0.001 vs HFD group).
Fig. 2Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in HFD-induced obese mice. (A) OGTT. (B) Quantification of area under the curve (AUC) from OGTT. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. SD, standard diet group (n = 7); HFD, high fat diet group (n = 12); HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with administration of ALA and SFC group (n = 11) (†p<0.05, ††p<0.01, †††p<0.001 vs SD group; *p<0.01, **p<0.001 vs HFD group).
Fig. 3Histology of kidneys in HFD-induced obese mice. (A) Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-stained kidney sections in high fat diet-induced obese mice. Scale bar means 20 µm. (B) Glomerular tuft area. (C) Glomerular diameter. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. SD, standard diet group (n = 7); HFD, high fat diet group (n = 7); HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with administration of ALA and SFC group (n = 7) (†p<0.001 vs SD group; *p<0.01 vs HFD group).
Fig. 4HO-1 protein expression in kidney of HFD-induced obese mice. (A) Western blot of HO-1 and GAPDH (B) Quantitative levels of HO-1/GAPDH protein expressions. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 7. SD, standard diet group; HFD, high fat diet group; HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with administration of ALA and SFC group (*p<0.001 vs HFD group).
Fig. 5The effect of ALA/SFC on hepatic steatosis in HFD-induced obese mice. (A) Liver dissections. (B) Oil red stained liver sections. Original magnification ×200. SD, standard diet group; HFD, high fat diet group; HFD + ALA/SFC, high fat diet with administration of ALA and SFC group.