Tanis R Fenton1, Ian J Griffin2, Angela Hoyos3, Sharon Groh-Wargo4, Diane Anderson5, Richard A Ehrenkranz6, Thibault Senterre7. 1. Nutrition Services, Alberta Health Services, Community Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. TFenton@ucalgary.ca. 2. Biomedical Research Institute of New Jersey & Mid-Atlantic Neonatal Associates, Morristown, NJ, USA. 3. Clínica del Country, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia. 4. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 7. CHU de Liege, CHR de la Citadelle, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined preterm infants' weight gain velocity (WGV) to determine how much calculation methods influences actual WGV during the first 28 days of life. METHODS: WGV methods (Average 2-point, Exponential 2-point, Early 1-point, and Daily) were calculated weekly and for various start times (birth, nadir, regain, day 3 and day 7) to 28 days of age for 103 preterm < 1500 gram infants, with daily weights. RESULTS: Range of WGV estimates decreased 10-22 g/kg/day to 15.5-15.8 g/kg/day when the Early 1-point method and the postnatal weight loss phase were excluded. WGV were lower when the postnatal weight loss was included and higher using the early method. WGV calculations beginning at day 7 did not differ from calculations beginning at the nadir. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in WGV calculations were large enough to create difficulties for comparing results between studies and translating research to practice. We recommend that the postnatal weight loss phase be excluded from WGV calculations and clinical studies report weight nadir and weights at day 7 and 28 to allow adequate comparison and translation of findings in clinical practice. The Average2pt method may be easier to calculate at bedside, so we recommend it be used in clinical settings and research summaries. The Early1pt method should not be used to summarize WGV for research.
BACKGROUND: We examined preterm infants' weight gain velocity (WGV) to determine how much calculation methods influences actual WGV during the first 28 days of life. METHODS: WGV methods (Average 2-point, Exponential 2-point, Early 1-point, and Daily) were calculated weekly and for various start times (birth, nadir, regain, day 3 and day 7) to 28 days of age for 103 preterm < 1500 gram infants, with daily weights. RESULTS: Range of WGV estimates decreased 10-22 g/kg/day to 15.5-15.8 g/kg/day when the Early 1-point method and the postnatal weight loss phase were excluded. WGV were lower when the postnatal weight loss was included and higher using the early method. WGV calculations beginning at day 7 did not differ from calculations beginning at the nadir. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in WGV calculations were large enough to create difficulties for comparing results between studies and translating research to practice. We recommend that the postnatal weight loss phase be excluded from WGV calculations and clinical studies report weight nadir and weights at day 7 and 28 to allow adequate comparison and translation of findings in clinical practice. The Average2pt method may be easier to calculate at bedside, so we recommend it be used in clinical settings and research summaries. The Early1pt method should not be used to summarize WGV for research.
Authors: Tanis R Fenton; Barbara Cormack; Dena Goldberg; Roseann Nasser; Belal Alshaikh; Misha Eliasziw; William W Hay; Angela Hoyos; Diane Anderson; Frank Bloomfield; Ian Griffin; Nicholas Embleton; Niels Rochow; Sarah Taylor; Thibault Senterre; Richard J Schanler; Seham Elmrayed; Sharon Groh-Wargo; David Adamkin; Prakesh S Shah Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Emily A Messick; Carl H Backes; Kenneth Jackson; Sara Conroy; Stephen A Hart; Clifford L Cua Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Manuela Cardoso; Daniel Virella; Israel Macedo; Diana Silva; Luís Pereira-da-Silva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390