| Literature DB >> 30704412 |
Christian S Eriksen1,2, Rene B Svensson3, Anne T Gylling3,4, Christian Couppé3,5, S Peter Magnusson3,5, Michael Kjaer3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regular loading of tendons may counteract the negative effects of aging. However, the influence of strength training loading magnitude on tendon mechanical properties and its relation to matrix collagen content and collagen cross-linking is sparsely described in older adults. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of moderate or high load resistance training on tendon matrix and its mechanical properties.Entities:
Keywords: Aging.; Collagen cross-links.; Strength training.; Tendon biomechanics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30704412 PMCID: PMC6357404 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1043-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Typical magnetic resonance images of the proximal patellar tendon from the same subject before (PRE) and after (POST) 12 months intervention. The two images are obtained at the same location
Participant baseline characteristics
| Total | CON | MRT | HRT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants | 33 | 10 | 13 | 10 |
| Sex (men/women) | 18/15 | 6/4 | 5/8 | 7/3 |
| Age (y) | 67 ± 2 | 68 ± 1.8 | 66 ± 2.4 | 67 ± 2.3 |
| Height (cm) | 173 ± 8 | 175 ± 8 | 173 ± 7 | 171 ± 8 |
| Weight (kg) | 78 ± 14 | 82 ± 16.9 | 73 ± 12 | 79 ± 14 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.8 ± 3.7 | 26.6 ± 4.3 | 24.3 ± 3.5 | 26.9 ± 3.1 |
| HbA1c (mmol/l) | 36 ± 3.1 | 37 ± 3.5 | 35.2 ± 3.0 | 35.4 ± 2.9 |
| Total-C (mmol/l) | 5.9 ± 0.9 | 5.7 ± 0.8 | 6.0 ± 1.0 | 6.0 ± 0.9 |
| Training Compliance (%) | 86 ± 12 | 86 ± 16 | 86 ± 7 |
Values are mean ± SD. Baseline group-differences within studies evaluated with one-way ANOVA, chi-square test (sex distribution), and Welch’s unpaired t-test (compliance). No significant group differences
HRT heavy resistance training, MRT moderate load resistance training, CON control, BMI body mass index, Total-C total cholesterol
Fig. 2Isometric quadriceps (Q)-strength and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) before (0 months) and after 12 months heavy resistance training (HRT), moderate load resistance training (MRT) or no training (CON). *Significant time x group interaction based on 2-way repeated measures ANOVA (p < 0.05) a: Significantly different from 0 months (p < 0.05). b: Significantly different from CON12 (p < 0.05), and c: Significantly different from MRT12 (p < 0.05) based on Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test
Fig. 3Illustration of average patellar tendon force/deformation (left) and stress/strain (right) curves before (PRE) and after (POST) 12 months heavy load resistance training (HRT), moderate load resistance training (MRT), or no training (CON)
Maximal patellar tendon mechanical properties
| CON ( | MRT ( | HRT ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mths | 12 mths | 0 mths | 12 mths | 0 mths | 12 mths | |
| Internal moment arm (cm) | 2.75 ± 0.04 | 2.79 ± 0.04 | 2.73 ± 0.05 | |||
| Maximal deformation (mm) | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.3 |
| Maximal force (N) | 4890 ± 390 | 5020 ± 330 | 4070 ± 480 | 4690 ± 490 | 5020 ± 530 | 5550 ± 470 |
| Maximal stiffness (N/mm)** | 3530 ± 490 | 3010 ± 440 | 3350 ± 300 | 3170 ± 210 | 4060 ± 430 | 4420 ± 340B |
| Maximal strain (%) | 6.0 ± 0.8 | 6.4 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 5.5 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 0.5 |
| Maximal stress (MPa) | 43 ± 3 | 43 ± 2 | 33 ± 3 | 36 ± 3 | 43 ± 4 | 45 ± 3 |
| Maximal modulus(MPa)* | 1430 ± 2000 | 1200 ± 180 | 1180 ± 70 | 1090 ± 50 | 1510 ± 150 | 1560 ± 140 |
Values are means ±SE. Data analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA with baseline adjustment and Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests
CON control, MRT moderate load resistance training, HRT heavy resistance training
Significant interaction denoted by *(p < 0.05) or **(p < 0.01). Main effect of time denoted by ‡(p < 0.05) or ‡‡(p < 0.01). Post hoc tests: B: significant difference from CON12 (p < 0.05)
Fig. 4Common force patellar tendon (PT) stiffness and Young’s modulus before (0 months) and after 12 months heavy resistance training (HRT), moderate load resistance training (MRT) or no training (CON). Bars represent mean ± SE. Significant time x group interaction denoted by **(p < 0.01) or *(p = 0.05) based on repeated measures 2-way ANOVA. A: Significantly different from 0 months (p < 0.05). B: Significantly different from CON12 (p < 0.05), C: Significantly different from MRT12 (p < 0.05) based on Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test
Fig. 5Changes in patellar tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) in three different regions (proximal, mid, distal) and in total after 12 months heavy resistance training (HRT), moderate load resistance training (MRT) or no training (CON). Bars represent mean ± SE. *Significant time x group interaction based on repeated measures ANOVA (pz0.05). ‡: Main effect of time (p < 0.05). a: Significant change from 0 to 12 months (p < 0.05), b: Significantly different from CON (p < 0.05), c: Significantly different from MRT (p < 0.05) based on Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test
Collagen fibril morphology
| CON | MRT | HRT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mths ( | 12 mths ( | 0 mths ( | 12 mths ( | 0 mths ( | 12 mths ( | |
| Volume Fraction (%) | 63 ± 2 | 59 ± 1 | 59 ± 2 | 62 ± 1 | 59 ± 2 | 59 ± 2 |
| Mean fibril diameter (nm)‡ | 91 ± 5 | 83 ± 4 | 87 ± 3 | 86 ± 5 | 89 ± 4 | 78 ± 3 |
| Density (#/μm2)‡ | 27 ± 2 | 31 ± 3 | 28 ± 2 | 33 ± 3 | 28 ± 3 | 36 ± 3 |
Values are means ±SE. Data analyzed by repeated measures 2-way ANOVA with baseline adjustment and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test
HRT heavy resistance training, MRT moderate load resistance training, CON no training
Main effect of time denoted by ‡(p < 0.05)
aOne value missing due to technical problems
Collagen and collagen cross-links
| CON | MRT | HRT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mths (n = 10) | 12 mths (n = 10) | 0 mths (n = 13) | 12 mths (n = 13) | 0 mths ( | 12 mths (n = 9)a | |
| Collagen (%) | 69 ± 3 | 62 ± 2 | 61 ± 4 | 59 ± 2 | 63 ± 3 | 61 ± 2 |
| HP (mmol/mol collagen)b | 298 ± 28 | 322 ± 25 | 314 ± 23 | 267 ± 21 | 254 ± 28 | 292 ± 22 |
| LP (mmol/mol collagen)b | 24.8 ± 5.0 | 26.5 ± 3.8 | 40.8 ± 4.4 | 28.8 ± 5.1 | 37.0 ± 5.9 | 34.3 ± 3.2 |
| Fluorescence (AU/mol collagen)‡ | 1139 [1096–1185] | 1235 [1176–1297] | 1155 [1124–1187] | 1196 [1161–1232] | 1263 [1191–1339] | 1328 [1285–1372] |
Values are means ±SE or geometric mean [lower limit – upper limit]. Data analyzed by repeated measures two-way ANOVA with baseline adjustment and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test
CON = Control, MRT = moderate load resistance training, HRT = Heavy load resistance training
No time x group interactions. ‡: Main effect of time (p < 0.05)
aOne missing sample due to anti-coagulant therapy. bFive missing pairs of samples due to logistics
CON: n = 9, MRT: n = 11, HRT: n = 8
Fig. 6Fluorescence of patellar tendon (PT) biopsies as a marker of non-enzymatic (AGE) cross-links before (0 months) and after 12 months intervention. ‡: Main effect of time (p < 0.05) based on repeated measures two-way ANOVA with baseline adjustment. AU = arbitrary units
Fig. 7Correlation between age and patellar tendon (PT) fluorescence using bot PRE and POST values as determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Dotted lines are 95% confidence bands of the best fit