Carlos Rodriguez-Lopez1,2, Julian Alcazar1,2, Jose Losa-Reyna1,2,3, Noelia Maria Martin-Espinosa4, Ivan Baltasar-Fernandez1,2, Ignacio Ara1,2, Robert Csapo5, Luis M Alegre1,2. 1. GENUD Toledo Research Group, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain. 2. CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Geriatrics, Hospital Virgen del Valle, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain. 4. Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain. 5. Research Unit for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Injury Prevention, ISAG, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Power-oriented resistance training (PRT) is one of the most effective exercise programs to counteract neuromuscular and physical function age-related declines. However, the optimal load that maximizes these outcomes or the load-specific adaptations induced on muscle power determinants remain to be better understood. Furthermore, to investigate whether these adaptations are potentially transferred to an untrained limb (i.e., cross-education phenomenon) could be especially relevant during limb-immobilization frequently observed in older people (e.g., after hip fracture). METHODS: At least 30 well-functioning older participants (>65 years) will participate in a within-person randomized controlled trial. After an 8-week control period, the effects of two 12-week PRT programs using light vs. heavy loads will be compared using an unilateral exercise model through three study arms (light-load PRT vs. non-exercise; heavy-load PRT vs. non-exercise; and light- vs. heavy- load PRT). Muscle-tendon function, muscle excitation and morphology and physical function will be evaluated to analyze the load-specific effects of PRT in older people. Additionally, the effects of PRT will be examined on a non-exercised contralateral limb. DISCUSSION: Tailored exercise programs are largely demanded given their potentially greater efficiency preventing age-related negative consequences, especially during limb-immobilization. This trial will provide evidence supporting the use of light- or heavy-load PRT on older adults depending on individual needs, improving decision making and exercise program efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03724461 registration data: October 30, 2018.
BACKGROUND: Power-oriented resistance training (PRT) is one of the most effective exercise programs to counteract neuromuscular and physical function age-related declines. However, the optimal load that maximizes these outcomes or the load-specific adaptations induced on muscle power determinants remain to be better understood. Furthermore, to investigate whether these adaptations are potentially transferred to an untrained limb (i.e., cross-education phenomenon) could be especially relevant during limb-immobilization frequently observed in older people (e.g., after hip fracture). METHODS: At least 30 well-functioning older participants (>65 years) will participate in a within-person randomized controlled trial. After an 8-week control period, the effects of two 12-week PRT programs using light vs. heavy loads will be compared using an unilateral exercise model through three study arms (light-load PRT vs. non-exercise; heavy-load PRT vs. non-exercise; and light- vs. heavy- load PRT). Muscle-tendon function, muscle excitation and morphology and physical function will be evaluated to analyze the load-specific effects of PRT in older people. Additionally, the effects of PRT will be examined on a non-exercised contralateral limb. DISCUSSION: Tailored exercise programs are largely demanded given their potentially greater efficiency preventing age-related negative consequences, especially during limb-immobilization. This trial will provide evidence supporting the use of light- or heavy-load PRT on older adults depending on individual needs, improving decision making and exercise program efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03724461 registration data: October 30, 2018.
Authors: Jonathan F Bean; Suzanne G Leveille; Dan K Kiely; Stephania Bandinelli; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: David Colomer-Poveda; Salvador Romero-Arenas; Juan Fariñas; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; Tibor Hortobágyi; Gonzalo Márquez Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Garrett M Hester; Zachary K Pope; Mitchel A Magrini; Ryan J Colquhoun; Alejandra Barrera-Curiel; Carlos A Estrada; Alex A Olmos; Jason M DeFreitas Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Daniela Diaz; Cristian Martinez-Salazar; Pablo Valdés-Badilla; Pedro Delgado-Floody; Guillermo Méndez-Rebolledo; Rodrigo Cañas-Jamet; Carlos Cristi-Montero; Antonio García-Hermoso; Carlos Celis-Morales; Jason Moran; Thomas W Buford; Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas; Alicia M Alonso-Martinez; Mikel Izquierdo Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 4.458