Literature DB >> 33679447

Effects of Power-Oriented Resistance Training With Heavy vs. Light Loads on Muscle-Tendon Function in Older Adults: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carlos Rodriguez-Lopez1,2, Julian Alcazar1,2, Jose Losa-Reyna1,2,3, Noelia Maria Martin-Espinosa4, Ivan Baltasar-Fernandez1,2, Ignacio Ara1,2, Robert Csapo5, Luis M Alegre1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Power-oriented resistance training (PRT) is one of the most effective exercise programs to counteract neuromuscular and physical function age-related declines. However, the optimal load that maximizes these outcomes or the load-specific adaptations induced on muscle power determinants remain to be better understood. Furthermore, to investigate whether these adaptations are potentially transferred to an untrained limb (i.e., cross-education phenomenon) could be especially relevant during limb-immobilization frequently observed in older people (e.g., after hip fracture).
METHODS: At least 30 well-functioning older participants (>65 years) will participate in a within-person randomized controlled trial. After an 8-week control period, the effects of two 12-week PRT programs using light vs. heavy loads will be compared using an unilateral exercise model through three study arms (light-load PRT vs. non-exercise; heavy-load PRT vs. non-exercise; and light- vs. heavy- load PRT). Muscle-tendon function, muscle excitation and morphology and physical function will be evaluated to analyze the load-specific effects of PRT in older people. Additionally, the effects of PRT will be examined on a non-exercised contralateral limb. DISCUSSION: Tailored exercise programs are largely demanded given their potentially greater efficiency preventing age-related negative consequences, especially during limb-immobilization. This trial will provide evidence supporting the use of light- or heavy-load PRT on older adults depending on individual needs, improving decision making and exercise program efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03724461 registration data: October 30, 2018.
Copyright © 2021 Rodriguez-Lopez, Alcazar, Losa-Reyna, Martin-Espinosa, Baltasar-Fernandez, Ara, Csapo and Alegre.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; force-velocity; intensity; physical function; power training; strength training

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679447      PMCID: PMC7935559          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.635094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


  59 in total

1.  A comparison of leg power and leg strength within the InCHIANTI study: which influences mobility more?

Authors:  Jonathan F Bean; Suzanne G Leveille; Dan K Kiely; Stephania Bandinelli; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 2.  Cross education: possible mechanisms for the contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Training load but not fatigue affects cross-education of maximal voluntary force.

Authors:  David Colomer-Poveda; Salvador Romero-Arenas; Juan Fariñas; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; Tibor Hortobágyi; Gonzalo Márquez
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Age Does Not Attenuate Maximal Velocity Adaptations in the Ipsilateral and Contralateral Limbs During Unilateral Resistance Training.

Authors:  Garrett M Hester; Zachary K Pope; Mitchel A Magrini; Ryan J Colquhoun; Alejandra Barrera-Curiel; Carlos A Estrada; Alex A Olmos; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 5.  Effects of acute and chronic unilateral resistance training variables on ipsilateral motor cortical excitability and cross-education: A systematic review.

Authors:  D Colomer-Poveda; S Romero-Arenas; M Keller; T Hortobágyi; G Márquez
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Investigating human skeletal muscle physiology with unilateral exercise models: when one limb is more powerful than two.

Authors:  Martin J MacInnis; Chris McGlory; Martin J Gibala; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.665

7.  Cycling as a novel approach to resistance training increases muscle strength, power, and selected functional abilities in healthy older women.

Authors:  Andrea Macaluso; Archie Young; Katie S Gibb; David A Rowe; Giuseppe De Vito
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-08-22

Review 8.  Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults.

Authors:  Chiung-Ju Liu; Nancy K Latham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

9.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Effects of different doses of high-speed resistance training on physical performance and quality of life in older women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Daniela Diaz; Cristian Martinez-Salazar; Pablo Valdés-Badilla; Pedro Delgado-Floody; Guillermo Méndez-Rebolledo; Rodrigo Cañas-Jamet; Carlos Cristi-Montero; Antonio García-Hermoso; Carlos Celis-Morales; Jason Moran; Thomas W Buford; Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas; Alicia M Alonso-Martinez; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.